XPEV (30.06%) vs ZIM (2.73%): A Swing Trader's Comparative Study
Comparative Analysis: XPEV vs ZIM - An Examination of Two Industries' Performance and Compare Swing trader: Volatility Balanced Strategy (TA) 30.06% for XPEV vs Swing trader: Deep Trend Analysis (TA) 2.73% for ZIM
The world of stocks is a tumultuous landscape, with change being the only constant. The automotive and shipping sectors, represented here by XPEV (@Motor Vehicles) and ZIM (@Marine Shipping) respectively, are no exceptions to this rule. Let's dive deep into financial analytics to compare these two tickers and gain insightful perspectives.
Swing Trader Strategies & Performance
When comparing swing trader strategies, we observe a stark contrast. Employing a Volatility Balanced Strategy (TA) for XPEV resulted in a substantial gain of 30.06%. This strategy essentially focuses on leveraging market volatility to reap considerable profits, and in this case, it proves successful for XPEV.
Contrarily, the Deep Trend Analysis (TA) applied to ZIM yielded a comparatively modest 2.73%. This strategy primarily involves examining and predicting price patterns, but it appears to be less fruitful in ZIM's case, highlighting the significant difference in strategy performance across different industries and tickers.
Price Growth Analysis
XPEV outpaced ZIM with a commendable weekly price growth of +28.88%, significantly higher than ZIM's -1.53%. Interestingly, XPEV's growth surpasses the average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry, which was +6.08%. This outstanding performance demonstrates XPEV's robust position within its industry.
On the other hand, ZIM's negative price change contrasts with the positive average weekly price growth of +0.29% in the @Marine Shipping industry. This underperformance underscores a potential area for improvement or a different market dynamic for ZIM.
Examining industry performance on a broader timescale, the average monthly price growth for the @Motor Vehicles and @Marine Shipping industries was +10.79% and +0.90% respectively, while the quarterly price growth was +1.94% and +1.67% correspondingly. Despite the greater volatility in the automotive industry, it appears to be outperforming the marine shipping industry in growth metrics.
Upcoming Earnings Reports
Investors should also note the upcoming earnings report dates. XPEV is slated to report earnings on Aug 23, 2023, while ZIM is set to report a week earlier, on Aug 16, 2023. These dates could potentially bring significant shifts in stock performance, given that earnings reports often induce considerable market reactions.
This analysis portrays a distinct comparison between XPEV and ZIM in terms of strategy performance, price growth, and earnings report schedules. With different swing trader strategies yielding contrasting results, it underscores the need for investors to carefully tailor their investment strategies according to the unique characteristics and trends of each industry and ticker. In conclusion, while the @Motor Vehicles industry, represented by XPEV, currently seems more vibrant in growth metrics, investors should always consider the long-term trends and the individual characteristics of each ticker.
Momentum Indicator for ZIM turns positive, indicating new upward trend
ZIM saw its Momentum Indicator move above the 0 level on September 15, 2025. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new upward move. Traders may want to consider buying the stock or buying call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 73 similar instances where the indicator turned positive. In of the 73 cases, the stock moved higher in the following days. The odds of a move higher are at .
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where ZIM's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, of 26 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are .
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for ZIM just turned positive on September 15, 2025. Looking at past instances where ZIM's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in of 41 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where ZIM advanced for three days, in of 307 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator entered the overbought zone. Expect a price pull-back in the foreseeable future.
ZIM moved below its 50-day moving average on August 15, 2025 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for ZIM crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on August 25, 2025. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In of 18 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
The 50-day moving average for ZIM moved below the 200-day moving average on September 17, 2025. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where ZIM declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
ZIM broke above its upper Bollinger Band on September 17, 2025. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for ZIM entered a downward trend on September 16, 2025. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.456) is normal, around the industry mean (6.252). P/E Ratio (0.888) is within average values for comparable stocks, (34.191). ZIM's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is very low in comparison to the industry average of (1.328). Dividend Yield (0.459) settles around the average of (0.154) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.208) is also within normal values, averaging (1.978).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. ZIM’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. ZIM’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 67, placing this stock worse than average.
Industry description
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Advertisement
General Information
Industry MarineShipping
Advertisement