Advertisement
AGM vs DAN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGM is a Hold and DAN is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AGM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDAN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AGM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- DAN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AGM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DAN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AGM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- DAN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AGM (@Savings Banks) experienced а -1.77% price change this week, while DAN (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +1.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -2.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.16%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -0.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.71%.
Reported Earning Dates
AGM is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2026.
DAN is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Savings Banks (-2.75% weekly)A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.
@Auto Parts: OEM (-0.23% weekly)OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
| AGM | DAN | AGM / DAN | |
| Capitalization | 1.84B | 3.96B | 47% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 506M | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.566 | 54.899 | 1% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.06 | 71.32 | 14% |
| Revenue | 423M | 7.5B | 6% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 419M | - |
| Total Debt | 34.5B | 3.52B | 981% |
AGM | DAN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 47 Fair valued | 24 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 40 | 55 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 36 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 75 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 38 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DAN's Valuation (24) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as AGM (47) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that DAN’s stock grew similarly to AGM’s over the last 12 months.
AGM's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as DAN (55) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that AGM’s stock grew similarly to DAN’s over the last 12 months.
AGM's SMR Rating (36) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DAN (79) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that AGM’s stock grew somewhat faster than DAN’s over the last 12 months.
DAN's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as AGM (48) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that DAN’s stock grew similarly to AGM’s over the last 12 months.
AGM's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as DAN (75) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that AGM’s stock grew similarly to DAN’s over the last 12 months.
| AGM | DAN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 7 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 8 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 68% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EIM | 9.82 | N/A | N/A |
| Eaton Vance Municipal | |||
| HGRO | 31.59 | -0.06 | -0.18% |
| Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF | |||
| DIVO | 46.03 | -0.25 | -0.54% |
| Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | |||
| CGRO | 22.75 | -0.61 | -2.60% |
| CoreValues Alpha Greater China Gr ETF | |||
| KARS | 35.50 | -1.22 | -3.32% |
| KraneShares Eltc Vhl and Ft Mbly ETF | |||
AGM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AGM has been loosely correlated with GATX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AGM jumps, then GATX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AGM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AGM | 100% | -3.51% | ||
| GATX - AGM | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| BBDC - AGM | 50% Loosely correlated | -3.41% | ||
| R - AGM | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| URI - AGM | 49% Loosely correlated | +6.21% | ||
| AER - AGM | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.34% | ||
More | ||||
DAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DAN has been loosely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DAN jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAN | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| LEA - DAN | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| PHIN - DAN | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.95% | ||
| DCH - DAN | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| SMP - DAN | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| APTV - DAN | 54% Loosely correlated | +4.02% | ||
More | ||||