It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ALAR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ALAR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ALAR (@Packaged Software) experienced а +2.95% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.51% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.77%.
ALAR is expected to report earnings on Nov 26, 2024.
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
ALAR | HUBS | ALAR / HUBS | |
Capitalization | 129M | 32.3B | 0% |
EBITDA | -2.9M | -81.23M | 4% |
Gain YTD | 48.196 | 21.983 | 219% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 26.5M | 2.17B | 1% |
Total Cash | 10.9M | 1.39B | 1% |
Total Debt | 1.99M | 788M | 0% |
ALAR | HUBS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 39 Fair valued | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 33 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 24 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ALAR's Valuation (39) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (76). This means that ALAR’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Information Technology Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for ALAR (100). This means that HUBS’s stock grew significantly faster than ALAR’s over the last 12 months.
ALAR's SMR Rating (24) in the Information Technology Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for HUBS (90). This means that ALAR’s stock grew significantly faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as ALAR (64). This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to ALAR’s over the last 12 months.
ALAR's P/E Growth Rating (82) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as HUBS (100). This means that ALAR’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
ALAR | HUBS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago60% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago80% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 3 days ago72% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago74% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 3 days ago83% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago75% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago85% | 10 days ago66% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 3 days ago90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALAR has been loosely correlated with HCTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ALAR jumps, then HCTI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ALAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ALAR | 100% | -1.71% | ||
HCTI - ALAR | 33% Loosely correlated | +5.96% | ||
CRM - ALAR | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.96% | ||
VRSN - ALAR | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.60% | ||
CRWD - ALAR | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.76% | ||
HUBS - ALAR | 24% Poorly correlated | -2.28% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been loosely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HUBS | 100% | -2.28% | ||
CLSK - HUBS | 65% Loosely correlated | -5.60% | ||
COIN - HUBS | 64% Loosely correlated | -3.17% | ||
RIOT - HUBS | 60% Loosely correlated | -4.85% | ||
NOW - HUBS | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.61% | ||
CRM - HUBS | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
More |