AMAT
Price
$585.60
Change
+$18.35 (+3.23%)
Updated
Jun 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
450.37B
59 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GFS
Price
$83.98
Change
+$2.60 (+3.19%)
Updated
Jun 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
44.63B
57 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMAT vs GFS

Header iconAMAT vs GFS Comparison
Open Charts AMAT vs GFSBanner chart's image
AMAT vs GFS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Applied Materials (AMAT) vs. GlobalFoundries (GFS) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Applied Materials (AMAT) holds a dominant market position with a $309 billion market cap and superior profitability, including a 38.9% return on equity (ROE, a measure of how effectively a company uses shareholders' equity to generate profits), compared to GlobalFoundries (GFS)'s $36 billion cap and 7.8% ROE.
  • GFS has shown stronger year-to-date (YTD) performance at 86% gains versus AMAT's 52%, driven by demand in mature-node semiconductors for automotive and defense applications.
  • Both stocks trade at elevated price-to-earnings (P/E, a valuation ratio comparing stock price to earnings per share) ratios around 40, signaling high growth expectations in the semiconductor sector.
  • AMAT provides a dividend yield of 0.54%, appealing to income-focused investors, while GFS emphasizes growth in specialized markets.
  • Upcoming quarterly earnings reports—AMAT on May 14 and GFS around early May—could influence near-term momentum.
  • AMAT benefits from broader exposure to AI-driven advanced nodes, while GFS leverages niche strengths in mature technologies.

Introduction

In the dynamic semiconductor industry, AMAT and GFS represent contrasting yet complementary players: one as a leading equipment supplier and the other as a specialized foundry. This stock comparison analyzes their recent market positioning, performance, and growth drivers amid ongoing chip demand from AI, automotive, and defense sectors. Traders seeking momentum plays and long-term investors eyeing sector recovery will find value in understanding their relative strengths, risks, and AI-informed insights for informed decision-making in today's volatile market environment.

AMAT Overview and Recent Performance

Applied Materials (AMAT) is a premier provider of materials engineering solutions, including equipment for semiconductor manufacturing, display, and solar applications. In recent market activity, AMAT shares have delivered robust gains, with YTD returns of 52% and one-year returns exceeding 163%, though pulling back from a 52-week high of $420.50 amid broader semiconductor sector rotation. Sentiment has been bolstered by AI infrastructure demand, a 15% dividend increase to $0.53 per share, and strategic moves like acquiring NEXX to expand advanced packaging capabilities. Profitability remains strong, with a 27.8% profit margin and upcoming fiscal Q2 results on May 14 expected to highlight resilience despite a slight quarterly revenue dip. Analyst targets average $424, suggesting upside potential.

GFS Overview and Recent Performance

GlobalFoundries (GFS) operates as a pure-play semiconductor foundry, focusing on mature and specialty process technologies for automotive, aerospace, defense, and communications markets. Recent weeks have seen GFS shares surge to near 52-week highs around $65, posting impressive YTD gains of 86% and one-year returns of 85%, outperforming peers in momentum. Key drivers include rising demand for mature-node wafers, expanded partnerships like with Renesas for FD-SOI and BCD technologies, and signals of broad market recoveries. With Q1 earnings imminent and emphasis on high-margin niches, sentiment reflects optimism despite modest profitability metrics like a 13% profit margin. Analysts maintain a measured outlook, with average targets around $52.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots from its library of 351 bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies and timeframes. Currently featuring 25 standout bots tailored to current market conditions—like semiconductors, AI infrastructure, and volatility plays—these include high performers with annualized returns ranging from +23.53% to +163.10%, win rates of 51.30% to 88.33%, profit factors up to 11.70, and trade durations from 1 day to 49 days. Semiconductor-focused bots, for instance, trade 3-6 tickers with trend-following and swing strategies, offering real-time signals for copy trading with customizable risk management. Explore these bots to align automated strategies with stocks like AMAT and GFS in today's environment.

Head-to-Head Comparison

AMAT and GFS operate in the semiconductor supply chain, with AMAT as an upstream equipment maker serving foundries globally, including advanced nodes for AI chips, versus GFS's downstream fabrication focused on mature and specialty processes less exposed to cutting-edge competition. Growth drivers diverge: AMAT leverages broad AI and high-performance computing tailwinds, evidenced by higher revenue ($28B TTM) and quarterly earnings growth of 71%, while GFS capitalizes on automotive/defense recovery with stable but lower revenue ($6.8B TTM). Recent momentum favors GFS's YTD surge, but AMAT shows greater stability with lower beta (1.65 vs. 1.71) and dividend support. Risks include cyclical downturns and geopolitical tensions affecting both, though GFS's niche positioning offers trade-offs in diversification. Market sentiment tilts toward AMAT's superior margins (28% vs. 13%) and valuation metrics like PEG ratio (1.85 vs. 1.54), positioning it for sustained leadership.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron's AI models currently lean toward AMAT over GFS, citing greater trend consistency, elevated profitability (ROE 39% vs. 8%), stronger analyst price target upside (9% potential vs. downside), and broader exposure to high-growth AI catalysts. While GFS exhibits sharper recent momentum, AMAT's scale and stability suggest higher probability of outperformance in a risk-adjusted semiconductor rally.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

VS
AMAT vs. GFS commentary
Jun 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMAT is a StrongBuy and GFS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2026
Stock price -- (AMAT: $567.25 vs. GFS: $81.38)
Brand notoriety: AMAT: Notable vs. GFS: Not notable
AMAT represents the Electronic Production Equipment, while GFS is part of the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMAT: 110% vs. GFS: 41%
Market capitalization -- AMAT: $450.37B vs. GFS: $44.63B
AMAT [@Electronic Production Equipment] is valued at $450.37B. GFS’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $44.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $727.02B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $4.97T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $75.34B. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $192.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMAT’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileGFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AMAT’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • GFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMAT is a better buy in the long-term than GFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMAT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AMAT and GFS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AMAT (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а +25.22% price change this week, while GFS (@Semiconductors) price change was +7.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was +15.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +165.80%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +5.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +112.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMAT is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2026.

GFS is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Production Equipment (+15.67% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

@Semiconductors (+5.03% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMAT($450B) has a higher market cap than GFS($44.6B). AMAT (53.36) and GFS (51.10) have similar P/E ratio . GFS YTD gains are higher at: 133.047 vs. AMAT (121.279). AMAT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 11.1B vs. GFS (2.26B). AMAT has more cash in the bank: 8.24B vs. GFS (3.07B). GFS has less debt than AMAT: GFS (1.72B) vs AMAT (7.27B). AMAT has higher revenues than GFS: AMAT (29B) vs GFS (6.84B).
AMATGFSAMAT / GFS
Capitalization450B44.6B1,009%
EBITDA11.1B2.26B490%
Gain YTD121.279133.04791%
P/E Ratio53.3651.10104%
Revenue29B6.84B424%
Total Cash8.24B3.07B268%
Total Debt7.27B1.72B422%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMAT: Fundamental Ratings
AMAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
43
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7
SMR RATING
1..100
24
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMATGFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GWRS7.030.04
+0.57%
Global Water Resources
SITE106.50-0.38
-0.36%
SiteOne Landscape Supply
CVE28.27-0.21
-0.74%
Cenovus Energy
HIVE3.73-0.06
-1.58%
HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd
PETZ1.54-0.16
-9.41%
TDH Holdings

GFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFS has been closely correlated with KLIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GFS jumps, then KLIC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFS
1D Price
Change %
GFS100%
+0.79%
KLIC - GFS
72%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
FORM - GFS
69%
Closely correlated
+6.89%
ENTG - GFS
67%
Closely correlated
+3.86%
LRCX - GFS
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.18%
VECO - GFS
65%
Loosely correlated
+8.29%
More