ASC
Price
$10.78
Change
-$0.27 (-2.44%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
438.68M
89 days until earnings call
NAT
Price
$2.92
Change
+$0.07 (+2.46%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
618.31M
24 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASC vs NAT

Header iconASC vs NAT Comparison
Open Charts ASC vs NATBanner chart's image
ARDMORE SHIPPING
Price$10.78
Change-$0.27 (-2.44%)
Volume$623.04K
Capitalization438.68M
Nordic American Tanker
Price$2.92
Change+$0.07 (+2.46%)
Volume$2.58M
Capitalization618.31M
ASC vs NAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ASC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASC vs. NAT commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASC is a Hold and NAT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (ASC: $10.78 vs. NAT: $2.92)
Brand notoriety: ASC: Not notable vs. NAT: Notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASC: 102% vs. NAT: 126%
Market capitalization -- ASC: $438.68M vs. NAT: $618.31M
ASC [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $438.68M. NAT’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $618.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $32.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNAT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ASC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NAT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NAT is a better buy in the long-term than ASC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NAT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NAT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NAT is a better buy in the short-term than ASC.

Price Growth

ASC (@Marine Shipping) experienced а -0.92% price change this week, while NAT (@Marine Shipping) price change was +4.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +2.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

ASC is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

NAT is expected to report earnings on Sep 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+2.22% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAT($618M) has a higher market cap than ASC($439M). NAT has higher P/E ratio than ASC: NAT (17.18) vs ASC (10.47). NAT YTD gains are higher at: 22.774 vs. ASC (-10.032). ASC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 86.3M vs. NAT (65M). NAT has more cash in the bank: 103M vs. ASC (49.5M). ASC has less debt than NAT: ASC (28.6M) vs NAT (340M). NAT (327M) and ASC (324M) have equivalent revenues.
ASCNATASC / NAT
Capitalization439M618M71%
EBITDA86.3M65M133%
Gain YTD-10.03222.774-44%
P/E Ratio10.4717.1861%
Revenue324M327M99%
Total Cash49.5M103M48%
Total Debt28.6M340M8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASC vs NAT: Fundamental Ratings
ASC
NAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1313
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6198
SMR RATING
1..100
7979
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5650
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1015
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ASC's Valuation (13) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as NAT (17). This means that ASC’s stock grew similarly to NAT’s over the last 12 months.

ASC's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NAT (98). This means that ASC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NAT’s over the last 12 months.

ASC's SMR Rating (79) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as NAT (79). This means that ASC’s stock grew similarly to NAT’s over the last 12 months.

NAT's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as ASC (56). This means that NAT’s stock grew similarly to ASC’s over the last 12 months.

ASC's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as NAT (15). This means that ASC’s stock grew similarly to NAT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASCNAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RCEYX58.76N/A
N/A
Victory RS Large Cap Alpha Y
FDETX27.64N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Capital Development O
GSMQX19.02N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Svc
RYMVX72.71N/A
N/A
Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value A
FDVKX12.43N/A
N/A
Fidelity Value Discovery K6

ASC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASC has been closely correlated with HAFN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ASC jumps, then HAFN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASC
1D Price
Change %
ASC100%
-2.44%
HAFN - ASC
67%
Closely correlated
-3.10%
ECO - ASC
67%
Closely correlated
-1.51%
SFL - ASC
66%
Closely correlated
-0.85%
NAT - ASC
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.46%
BWLP - ASC
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
More

NAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NAT has been closely correlated with ECO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NAT jumps, then ECO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAT
1D Price
Change %
NAT100%
+2.46%
ECO - NAT
73%
Closely correlated
-1.51%
ASC - NAT
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.44%
HAFN - NAT
63%
Loosely correlated
-3.10%
SFL - NAT
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.85%
GNK - NAT
54%
Loosely correlated
-3.88%
More