BY
Price
$39.27
Change
+$0.05 (+0.13%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.78B
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CASH
Price
$88.24
Change
+$0.54 (+0.62%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.86B
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BY vs CASH

BY vs CASH Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 30, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Byline Bancorp (BY) vs. Pathward Financial (CASH) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Byline Bancorp (BY) recently delivered record quarterly results, beating Wall Street estimates and posting a 36% year-over-year earnings per share (EPS) increase, while raising its dividend 16.7%.
  • Pathward Financial (CASH) reported a sharp earnings miss in its latest quarter, driven by elevated credit provisions tied to a small number of commercial loans, sending shares lower in after-hours trading.
  • Both companies operate in the U.S. financial sector, yet their business models diverge meaningfully: BY is a traditional Chicago-based commercial bank, while CASH runs a diversified national platform spanning partner solutions, commercial finance, and tax services.
  • Momentum currently favors BY, which has posted 15 consecutive quarters of pre-tax pre-provision return on average assets (ROAA) above 2.00% and achieved its best efficiency ratio as a public company.
  • CASH maintains strong long-term fundamentals — including a return on average tangible equity above 30% — but near-term credit uncertainty has introduced volatility and weighed on sentiment.
  • The two stocks also differ in valuation: BY trades at a price-to-earnings ratio near 12 with a tangible book value multiple around 1.5x, while CASH carries a higher price-to-book ratio above 2.3x, reflecting its historically stronger profitability profile.

Introduction

Investors evaluating regional and specialty financial stocks often encounter a wide spectrum of risk-reward profiles. This comparison examines two distinct institutions — Byline Bancorp, Inc. (BY), a Chicago-based commercial bank approaching $10 billion in assets, and Pathward Financial, Inc. (CASH), a Sioux Falls-based financial holding company operating nationally across partner solutions, commercial finance, and tax services. Both stocks have drawn attention in recent weeks for diverging reasons: BY for record-setting quarterly results, and CASH for an earnings miss driven by concentrated credit events. Understanding how these two companies compare across momentum, risk factors, and market positioning can help traders and investors evaluate relative opportunities in the financial sector.

BY Overview and Recent Performance

Byline Bancorp, Inc. is the parent company of Byline Bank, a full-service commercial bank headquartered in Chicago, Illinois. The bank serves small- and medium-sized businesses, financial sponsors, and consumers through 44 branch locations across the Chicago and Milwaukee metropolitan areas. It is also one of the top Small Business Administration (SBA) lenders in the United States and offers small-ticket equipment leasing solutions. With approximately $9.9 billion in total assets as of mid-2026, Byline is approaching the $10 billion regulatory threshold that would trigger additional oversight requirements.

In recent weeks, BY has exhibited strong upward momentum. The company reported second-quarter 2026 net income of $40.2 million, or $0.90 in diluted EPS, comfortably exceeding the consensus analyst estimate of $0.79. Total revenue reached $117.7 million, also ahead of forecasts. Diluted EPS rose 36% year-over-year and 8% sequentially. The company's adjusted efficiency ratio improved to 46.51% — its best mark as a public company — reflecting disciplined expense management alongside revenue growth. Return on average assets (ROAA) reached 1.63%, while return on average tangible common equity (ROTCE) hit 14.47%. These results marked the 15th consecutive quarter with pre-tax pre-provision ROAA above 2.00%. In response to the strong operating performance, the Board of Directors approved a 16.7% dividend increase to $0.14 per share. Shares reacted positively, touching a new 52-week high following the earnings release.

CASH Overview and Recent Performance

Pathward Financial, Inc. is a U.S.-based financial holding company operating through its subsidiary, Pathward, N.A. The company pursues a purpose-driven strategy of powering financial inclusion, with two primary business lines: Partner Solutions — which includes issuing, acquiring, digital payments, credit solutions, and tax services — and Commercial Finance, encompassing working capital, equipment financing, and structured finance. CASH works extensively with fintech partners, governments, and businesses nationwide, maintaining a diversified revenue base where noninterest income regularly contributes over 40% of total revenue.

Recent market activity surrounding CASH has been shaped by its fiscal third-quarter 2026 earnings report, which fell short of expectations. The company posted net income of $29.0 million, or $1.37 per diluted share — well below the $1.95 consensus estimate. The primary driver was a sharp increase in credit provisions, totaling approximately $34 million in the Commercial Finance segment, tied to specific reserves on two loans and a Current Expected Credit Losses (CECL) reserve build. Nonperforming loans surged to 5.28% of total loans, driven by renewable energy construction projects associated with a common developer, alongside a potential fraud-related working capital loan. Despite these credit headwinds, the underlying business demonstrated resilience: commercial finance interest income grew, noninterest income rose 4%, and new loan originations jumped from $1.10 billion to $1.86 billion year-over-year. Management lowered fiscal 2026 EPS guidance to a range of $7.80 to $8.20 and introduced fiscal 2027 guidance of $9.50 to $10.00. Shares declined approximately 4% in after-hours trading following the report.

Trending AI Robots

Traders seeking a data-driven edge in comparing stocks like BY and CASH may find value in Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI-powered trading bots that scan thousands of tickers across multiple timeframes, but only the strongest performers — those best aligned with current market conditions — earn a spot in the curated Trending AI Robots section. These virtual agents employ diverse trading styles and strategies: some target short-term breakouts on 5-minute and 15-minute charts, while others follow longer-duration swing or trend-following approaches. Performance metrics among featured bots have shown win rates exceeding 60% and annualized returns reaching into the double and even triple digits, depending on the strategy and market environment. Each bot comes with fully transparent statistics including profit factors, Sharpe ratios, and trade-by-trade history. For investors who want to supplement their own research with AI-driven signals, exploring the Trending AI Robots page offers a practical starting point.

Head-to-Head Comparison

When placed side by side, BY and CASH present a study in contrasting risk profiles within the financial sector. Byline Bancorp operates a concentrated regional franchise — its fortunes are closely tied to the Chicago and Milwaukee economies, commercial real estate exposure, and small-business lending cycles. This geographic concentration can act as both a strength, when local economic conditions are favorable, and a vulnerability during regional downturns. Pathward Financial, by contrast, runs a national, multi-line platform. Its Partner Solutions and tax services businesses generate significant fee-based revenue that is less dependent on interest rate spreads, providing a natural hedge against net interest margin (NIM) compression — the difference between what a bank earns on loans and pays on deposits.

On growth drivers, BY is executing a disciplined organic expansion strategy, steadily growing loans and deposits at a mid-single-digit pace while improving operational efficiency. Its approaching $10 billion asset milestone represents both a growth marker and a regulatory inflection point. CASH is pursuing growth through partner ecosystem expansion, new contract wins in Credit Solutions, and increasing commercial finance originations — loan production in the latest quarter nearly doubled year-over-year to $1.86 billion.

The most striking divergence lies in credit quality. BY has maintained stable credit metrics, with net charge-offs declining and its allowance for credit losses to total loans ratio holding steady at 1.48%. CASH has encountered concentrated credit deterioration, with nonperforming loans spiking to 5.28% of total loans — a level that, while management characterizes it as idiosyncratic rather than systemic, has nonetheless reset near-term earnings expectations. In terms of market sentiment, BY carries a consensus "Moderate Buy" rating with analysts raising price targets, while CASH retains a "Buy" consensus but faces elevated scrutiny around credit normalization. Institutional ownership is substantial for both stocks — roughly 68% for BY and over 92% for CASH.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable, quantifiable factors, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely favor Byline Bancorp (BY) under current market conditions. The rationale centers on trend consistency: BY has posted 15 consecutive quarters of pre-tax pre-provision ROAA above 2.00%, delivered a positive earnings surprise, raised its dividend, and achieved record efficiency — all signals that algorithmic trend-following models typically reward. Credit quality remains stable, and momentum indicators point upward. For CASH, the elevated credit provisions and nonperforming loan ratio introduce uncertainty that trend-sensitive AI models tend to penalize in the near term, even if the long-term business model remains fundamentally attractive. That said, CASH's diversified revenue streams, aggressive share repurchase program, and 2027 guidance implying 16-22% EPS growth could regain AI favor once credit metrics stabilize. In probabilistic terms, BY currently presents the cleaner trend profile, while CASH may offer greater potential upside for models that incorporate mean-reversion logic — but only after credit visibility improves.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BY vs. CASH commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BY is a Buy and CASH is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (BY: $39.27 vs. CASH: $88.24)
Brand notoriety: BY and CASH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BY: 63% vs. CASH: 53%
Market capitalization -- BY: $1.78B vs. CASH: $1.86B
BY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.78B. CASH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCASH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CASH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BY is a better buy in the long-term than CASH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CASH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CASH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CASH is a better buy in the short-term than BY.

Price Growth

BY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.74% price change this week, while CASH (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

BY is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

CASH is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CASH($1.86B) and BY($1.78B) have the same market capitalization . BY has higher P/E ratio than CASH: BY (12.75) vs CASH (11.04). BY YTD gains are higher at: 35.721 vs. CASH (24.428). CASH has less debt than BY: CASH (59.5M) vs BY (580M). CASH has higher revenues than BY: CASH (685M) vs BY (450M).
BYCASHBY / CASH
Capitalization1.78B1.86B96%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD35.72124.428146%
P/E Ratio12.7511.04115%
Revenue450M685M66%
Total Cash60.2MN/A-
Total Debt580M59.5M975%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BY vs CASH: Fundamental Ratings
BY
CASH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8250
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3042
SMR RATING
1..100
4328
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4052
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2538
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BY's Valuation (68) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CASH (78) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BY’s stock grew similarly to CASH’s over the last 12 months.

BY's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CASH (42) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BY’s stock grew similarly to CASH’s over the last 12 months.

CASH's SMR Rating (28) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as BY (43) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CASH’s stock grew similarly to BY’s over the last 12 months.

BY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CASH (52) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BY’s stock grew similarly to CASH’s over the last 12 months.

BY's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CASH (38) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BY’s stock grew similarly to CASH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BYCASH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CASH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ANV25.300.25
+1.02%
GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF
BGDV31.110.13
+0.42%
Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF
BKGI45.28-0.13
-0.29%
BNY Mellon Global Infras Inc ETF
LKOR40.08-0.15
-0.37%
FlexShares Crdt-Scrd US Lng Corp Bd ETF
PTH58.10-1.17
-1.98%
Invesco Dorsey Wright Healthcare MomtETF

CASH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CASH has been loosely correlated with AMAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CASH jumps, then AMAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CASH
1D Price
Change %
CASH100%
+0.62%
AMAL - CASH
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.02%
FRME - CASH
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
ONB - CASH
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
SSB - CASH
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
BY - CASH
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
More