CELH
Price
$63.35
Change
+$1.40 (+2.26%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
16.33B
10 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
KO
Price
$69.71
Change
-$0.23 (-0.33%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
299.87B
114 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CELH vs KO

Header iconCELH vs KO Comparison
Open Charts CELH vs KOBanner chart's image
Celsius Holdings
Price$63.35
Change+$1.40 (+2.26%)
Volume$2.32M
Capitalization16.33B
Coca-Cola
Price$69.71
Change-$0.23 (-0.33%)
Volume$15.69M
Capitalization299.87B
CELH vs KO Comparison Chart in %
CELH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CELH vs. KO commentary
Oct 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CELH is a StrongBuy and KO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CELH: $63.35 vs. KO: $69.71)
Brand notoriety: CELH: Not notable vs. KO: Notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CELH: 45% vs. KO: 95%
Market capitalization -- CELH: $16.33B vs. KO: $299.87B
CELH [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $16.33B. KO’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $299.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $299.87B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $22.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CELH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CELH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CELH and KO are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CELH’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CELH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • KO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CELH is a better buy in the short-term than KO.

Price Growth

CELH (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -2.33% price change this week, while KO (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +1.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

CELH is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

KO is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+0.80% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KO($300B) has a higher market cap than CELH($16.3B). CELH has higher P/E ratio than KO: CELH (166.71) vs KO (23.08). CELH YTD gains are higher at: 140.509 vs. KO (14.465). KO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 17.8B vs. CELH (184M). CELH has less debt than KO: CELH (863M) vs KO (49.4B). KO has higher revenues than CELH: KO (47.1B) vs CELH (1.67B).
CELHKOCELH / KO
Capitalization16.3B300B5%
EBITDA184M17.8B1%
Gain YTD140.50914.465971%
P/E Ratio166.7123.08722%
Revenue1.67B47.1B4%
Total Cash615MN/A-
Total Debt863M49.4B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CELH vs KO: Fundamental Ratings
CELH
KO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4628
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5415
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3753
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
267
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KO's Valuation (36) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CELH (93). This means that KO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CELH’s over the last 12 months.

KO's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CELH (54). This means that KO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CELH’s over the last 12 months.

KO's SMR Rating (100) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CELH (100). This means that KO’s stock grew similarly to CELH’s over the last 12 months.

CELH's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as KO (53). This means that CELH’s stock grew similarly to KO’s over the last 12 months.

CELH's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KO (67). This means that CELH’s stock grew somewhat faster than KO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CELHKO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
39%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
22%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CELH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FYEE28.430.19
+0.67%
Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF
DGS57.130.08
+0.14%
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmCp Div ETF
ALLW28.970.01
+0.03%
SPDR Bridgewater ALL Weather ETF
CVSE73.94N/A
N/A
Calvert US Select Equity ETF
FXD67.55-0.06
-0.09%
First Trust Cnsmr Discret AlphaDEX® ETF

CELH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CELH has been loosely correlated with MNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CELH jumps, then MNST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CELH
1D Price
Change %
CELH100%
+2.26%
MNST - CELH
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
KDP - CELH
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.42%
PEP - CELH
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
KO - CELH
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
CCEP - CELH
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
More

KO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KO has been loosely correlated with PEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KO jumps, then PEP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KO
1D Price
Change %
KO100%
-0.33%
PEP - KO
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
CCEP - KO
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
KDP - KO
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.42%
MNST - KO
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
COKE - KO
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
More