In the Industrials sector, particularly the Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery industry, investors often compare stocks like Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO) and PACCAR Inc (PCAR) for insights into equipment manufacturing and infrastructure-related plays. This stock comparison analyzes their recent market positioning, performance metrics, and sector dynamics. Traders seeking momentum in cyclical industrials or long-term holders eyeing dividend payers may find value in understanding their relative strengths amid fluctuating demand for heavy machinery and trucks. With broader economic factors like infrastructure spending influencing both, this review highlights key contrasts for informed decision-making.
Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO) designs and manufactures material handling products, including hoists, cranes, and rigging tools for industrial applications. In recent market activity, the stock has traded around $16, near the lower end of its 52-week range of $13.31 to $24.40, reflecting modest YTD gains of 6.42%. Sentiment has been influenced by a high P/E ratio of 76.62, signaling potential growth expectations despite thin profit margins of 0.60% on $1 billion in trailing twelve-month revenue. Key developments include a quarterly dividend declaration of $0.07 per share in late March, underscoring commitment to shareholders amid steady but unremarkable price behavior. Higher beta of 1.39 points to amplified market sensitivity, contributing to relative underperformance versus broader indices over longer periods.
PACCAR Inc (PCAR) is a leading producer of heavy-duty trucks under brands like Kenworth and Peterbilt, alongside parts and financial services. Recent weeks have seen the stock hover near $127, close to its 52-week high of $131.88 from a range starting at $84.65, driven by robust YTD returns of 16.27%. Strong fundamentals shine through with a P/E of 28.16, EPS of $4.51, and solid profitability on substantial revenues. Market sentiment reflects anticipation for Q1 earnings, despite projected declines, bolstered by recognitions of top suppliers and positive annual results earlier in the year. Lower beta of 1.06 suggests resilience, supporting outperformance against the S&P 500 in one-year and YTD metrics.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of 25 top-performing AI trading bots from a library of 351, chosen by AI analysis for their suitability to current market conditions across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots vary widely in strategies—from technical and fundamental analysis to real-time signal agents, virtual agents with risk management, and brokerage agents—operating on timeframes like 60-minute, 15-minute, or 5-minute charts, and tailored to low, medium, or high volatility. While specific win rates, profit factors, or drawdowns aren't detailed publicly, the platform emphasizes bots designed to outperform benchmarks in growth sectors. Traders can filter by asset class or style to copy proven performers trading thousands of tickers. Explore these tools to enhance your strategy in dynamic markets like industrials.
CMCO focuses on specialized components like hoists, contrasting PCAR's integrated truck manufacturing and financing model, exposing CMCO more to niche supply chains versus PCAR's diversified scale. Growth drivers differ: CMCO relies on industrial automation uptake, while PCAR benefits from freight demand and global trucking cycles. Recent momentum strongly favors PCAR, with superior YTD gains and proximity to highs, against CMCO's consolidation near lows. Risk profiles highlight CMCO's higher beta and valuation stretch, trading at a premium P/E amid thinner margins, while PCAR offers stability and earnings visibility. Sector exposure ties both to infrastructure and construction, but PCAR's size buffers sentiment shifts better.
Tickeron’s AI models would likely favor PCAR in the current environment due to its consistent upward trend, lower volatility, stronger relative performance, and upcoming catalysts like earnings reports, positioning it advantageously against CMCO's higher-risk profile and modest momentum. This assessment weighs observable stability and market positioning probabilistically, not as a guarantee of future results.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CMCO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePCAR’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CMCO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PCAR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
CMCO (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) experienced а -3.13% price change this week, while PCAR (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) price change was -0.47% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.44%.
CMCO is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
PCAR is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
The industry designs and builds agricultural, construction and other large commercial and transportation equipment. Tractors, planters and harvesters, as well as rock-crushing, railroad, demolition and other construction implements are produced by this industry. Rapid urbanization and industrialization has been bolstering the expansion of the construction sector in the past few decades, thereby boosting demand for heavy equipment businesses. Caterpillar Inc., Deere & Company and Cummins Inc (Ex. Cummins Engine Inc) are some prominent companies in this industry.
| CMCO | PCAR | CMCO / PCAR | |
| Capitalization | 420M | 63.2B | 1% |
| EBITDA | 88.3M | 3.57B | 2% |
| Gain YTD | -14.929 | 10.316 | -145% |
| P/E Ratio | 73.90 | 25.56 | 289% |
| Revenue | 1B | 27.8B | 4% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 8.86B | - |
| Total Debt | 450M | 14.9B | 3% |
CMCO | PCAR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 35 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 17 Undervalued | 24 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 21 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 63 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 27 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 12 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CMCO's Valuation (17) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as PCAR (24). This means that CMCO’s stock grew similarly to PCAR’s over the last 12 months.
PCAR's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMCO (100). This means that PCAR’s stock grew significantly faster than CMCO’s over the last 12 months.
PCAR's SMR Rating (63) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as CMCO (91). This means that PCAR’s stock grew similarly to CMCO’s over the last 12 months.
PCAR's Price Growth Rating (27) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as CMCO (53). This means that PCAR’s stock grew similarly to CMCO’s over the last 12 months.
PCAR's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMCO (88). This means that PCAR’s stock grew significantly faster than CMCO’s over the last 12 months.
| CMCO | PCAR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 6 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 75% | 23 days ago 48% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 53% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMCO has been loosely correlated with HY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMCO jumps, then HY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CMCO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMCO | 100% | -0.88% | ||
| HY - CMCO | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.93% | ||
| WNC - CMCO | 53% Loosely correlated | +6.16% | ||
| PCAR - CMCO | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.98% | ||
| OSK - CMCO | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.98% | ||
| MTW - CMCO | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PCAR has been loosely correlated with OSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PCAR jumps, then OSK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PCAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCAR | 100% | +0.98% | ||
| OSK - PCAR | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.98% | ||
| TEX - PCAR | 59% Loosely correlated | +3.17% | ||
| AGCO - PCAR | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| CNH - PCAR | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| WNC - PCAR | 55% Loosely correlated | +6.16% | ||
More | ||||