CMS Energy (CMS) and Evergy (EVRG) are prominent regulated electric utilities serving Midwest regions, making them natural comparables for investors eyeing defensive sectors amid market volatility. This stock comparison analyzes their recent performance, financial metrics, and market positioning, helping dividend seekers, income investors, and those rotating into utilities for stability. With rising power demand from data centers and AI infrastructure, both benefit from long-term growth drivers, but nuances in momentum and yields offer trade-offs for portfolio allocation.
CMS Energy Corporation (CMS), based in Michigan, operates electric and natural gas utilities primarily through its Consumers Energy subsidiary, serving over 6 million customers. In recent market activity, the stock has traded near its 52-week high of $80.36, closing around $76.27 with a market capitalization of approximately $23.5 billion. Year-to-date gains stand at about 9.9%, supported by expectations of Q1 earnings growth and a recent dividend declaration of $0.57 per share. Sentiment has been bolstered by robust power demand and analyst upgrades, including price targets up to $88, though shares remain sensitive to interest rate shifts typical in the utilities sector (P/E ratio (price-to-earnings ratio): 21.67 TTM (trailing twelve months)).
Evergy, Inc. (EVRG), serving Kansas and Missouri, is an integrated utility focused on electricity generation, transmission, and distribution for nearly 1.1 million customers. Recent weeks have seen the stock hit a 52-week high of $85.27 before settling around $81.23, with a market cap of about $18.7 billion and year-to-date returns of 13%. Positive analyst actions, such as Wells Fargo raising its target to $87, reflect optimism ahead of Q1 results, fueled by data center demand and a $21.6 billion capital plan through 2030. The P/E ratio stands at 22.19 TTM, with performance influenced by sector-wide growth in load demand and a dividend yield enhancement.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI trading bots out of over 350 available, each scanning thousands of tickers for optimal signals in current market conditions. These bots employ diverse strategies like trend following, multi-agent systems, and risk-managed virtual agents with take-profit/stop-loss corridors, delivering annualized returns ranging from 15% to 167%, win rates of 48% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.7. Timeframes vary from daily scalps to 55-day holds, targeting high-volatility sectors such as semiconductors, aerospace, and leveraged ETFs. While neither CMS nor EVRG features prominently, the curated selection highlights bots with superior risk-adjusted stats like profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 20. Investors can explore these for automated insights across styles and assets.
Both CMS and EVRG operate in the regulated electric utilities subsector, benefiting from stable cash flows and data center-driven load growth, but differ in scale and momentum. CMS boasts a larger market cap ($23.5B vs. $18.7B) and lower beta (0.42 vs. 0.60), signaling greater stability, while EVRG edges out on dividend yield (3.42% vs. 2.99%) and one-year returns (23% vs. 6%). Risk factors include interest rate sensitivity and regulatory approvals for capex, with EVRG showing stronger recent highs and analyst upgrades amid Kansas-focused expansions. Market sentiment favors EVRG for growth potential, contrasting CMS’s emphasis on Michigan reliability.
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward EVRG based on superior trend consistency, higher YTD and one-year momentum, elevated dividend yield, and positive analyst revisions in recent market activity. While CMS offers comparable stability and upcoming catalysts, EVRG’s relative positioning suggests a probabilistic edge for near-term outperformance in the utilities sector.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CMS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEVRG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CMS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EVRG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
CMS (@Electric Utilities) experienced а +0.73% price change this week, while EVRG (@Electric Utilities) price change was -0.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +0.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.85%.
CMS is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
EVRG is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.
| CMS | EVRG | CMS / EVRG | |
| Capitalization | 22.7B | 19B | 119% |
| EBITDA | 3.4B | 2.79B | 122% |
| Gain YTD | 6.540 | 15.730 | 42% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.30 | 21.94 | 93% |
| Revenue | 8.82B | 6.03B | 146% |
| Total Cash | 175M | 18.4M | 951% |
| Total Debt | 19.1B | 15.9B | 120% |
CMS | EVRG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | 34 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 47 | 28 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 64 | 76 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 31 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 31 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EVRG's Valuation (34) in the Electric Utilities industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMS (71). This means that EVRG’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMS’s over the last 12 months.
EVRG's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as CMS (47). This means that EVRG’s stock grew similarly to CMS’s over the last 12 months.
CMS's SMR Rating (64) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as EVRG (76). This means that CMS’s stock grew similarly to EVRG’s over the last 12 months.
EVRG's Price Growth Rating (31) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as CMS (53). This means that EVRG’s stock grew similarly to CMS’s over the last 12 months.
EVRG's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as CMS (53). This means that EVRG’s stock grew similarly to CMS’s over the last 12 months.
| CMS | EVRG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 39% | 4 days ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 47% | 4 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 47% | 4 days ago 40% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 45% | 4 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 49% | 12 days ago 51% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 39% | 4 days ago 38% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 6 days ago 53% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 26% | 4 days ago 41% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMS has been closely correlated with DTE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CMS jumps, then DTE could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EVRG has been closely correlated with LNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EVRG jumps, then LNT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EVRG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EVRG | 100% | -0.42% | ||
| LNT - EVRG | 80% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| AEE - EVRG | 79% Closely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| CMS - EVRG | 79% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| DUK - EVRG | 78% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| PNW - EVRG | 78% Closely correlated | -0.06% | ||
More | ||||