The U.S. homebuilding sector sits at the intersection of demographic demand and macroeconomic uncertainty. With mortgage rates remaining elevated and affordability concerns weighing on buyer sentiment, investors are scrutinizing how individual builders navigate this challenging environment. DHI (D.R. Horton) and KBH (KB Home) represent two distinct approaches to the same market. One is a scale-driven, nationally diversified giant; the other is a regionally focused builder emphasizing customization. This stock comparison examines how these two publicly traded homebuilders stack up across financial performance, business models, and relative market positioning — offering a data-driven lens for traders and investors evaluating the sector.
DHI, or D.R. Horton, Inc., has been the largest homebuilder by volume in the United States since 2002. Headquartered in Arlington, Texas, the company operates across 126 markets in 36 states, offering homes at price points generally ranging from $250,000 to over $1,000,000. Its diversified operations also include Forestar (a publicly traded residential lot development company), a growing single-family and multi-family rental segment, and in-house mortgage and title services. This broad operational footprint gives DHI a level of scale unmatched in the industry.
In recent quarters, DHI has navigated housing market headwinds with measured discipline. For its fiscal 2025 full year ended September 30, 2025, the company reported consolidated revenues of $34.25 billion and adjusted earnings per share (EPS) of $11.57, reflecting year-over-year declines driven by affordability constraints and elevated sales incentives. However, its first quarter of fiscal 2026 (ended December 31, 2025) showed signs of stabilization: net sales orders increased 3% year over year to 18,300 homes, and the company exceeded the high end of its closings and revenue guidance. D.R. Horton's pre-tax profit margin was 11.6% for that quarter. The company's balance sheet remains a competitive fortress, with total liquidity of $6.6 billion and a debt-to-total-capital ratio of just 18.8%. Over the trailing twelve months, return on equity (ROE) — a measure of how efficiently a company uses shareholder capital to generate profits — stood at 13.7%. Aggressive share repurchases, totaling $4.3 billion in fiscal 2025, have reduced the outstanding share count by approximately 9% year over year, providing a tailwind to per-share metrics even as absolute earnings compressed.
KBH, or KB Home, is a Los Angeles-based homebuilder with a 65-year operating history and a presence across 49 markets in eight states, including California, Florida, Texas, and North Carolina. The company is widely recognized for its built-to-order (BTO) model, which allows homebuyers to personalize their homes through company-owned design studios before construction begins. This approach differentiates KBH from competitors that rely primarily on speculative building and has earned the company the #1 customer-ranked national homebuilder designation based on third-party buyer surveys. The company also holds a leadership position in residential sustainability, having delivered more ENERGY STAR certified homes than any other builder.
Financially, KBH has faced a more pronounced slowdown. For its fiscal year ended November 30, 2025, the company reported revenues of $6.24 billion and net income of $428.8 million, with diluted EPS declining 27% year over year to $6.15. Homes delivered fell 9% to 12,902, and the average selling price dipped slightly to $481,400. In the fourth quarter alone, housing gross profit margin contracted to 17.0% (17.8% on an adjusted basis), down sharply from 20.9% a year earlier, reflecting price reductions, higher relative land costs, and geographic mix headwinds. Net orders in Q4 declined 10% year over year, and the backlog value at year-end was $1.40 billion, down 37%. On the positive side, KBH has reduced build times by approximately 20% year over year, a meaningful operational improvement. The company completed an upsized $1.20 billion revolving credit facility and extended its $360 million term loan to 2029. Total liquidity stood at $1.43 billion, and the debt-to-capital ratio was 30.3%. Book value per share grew 10% to $61.75. For fiscal 2026, management guided housing revenues of $5.1 billion to $6.1 billion, reflecting expectations of continued market softness through at least the first half of the year.
In a market environment where every basis point of margin and every shift in order trends can move stocks, traders are increasingly turning to AI-driven tools for timely, data-backed insights. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of AI trading bots designed to navigate real-time market conditions. With hundreds of bots available — each with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, and target ticker universe — only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market dynamics earn a place in this featured section. These bots trade across thousands of tickers and employ approaches ranging from short-term momentum strategies to longer-term trend-following models, with some achieving notable performance statistics across diverse market regimes. Whether you are monitoring the homebuilding sector or scanning for opportunities across other industries, exploring the Trending AI Robots page can help you identify tools suited to your trading objectives.
When comparing DHI and KBH, the contrast in scale is the most immediate differentiator. D.R. Horton generated approximately $34.3 billion in revenue in fiscal 2025 and closed nearly 85,000 homes, compared to KB Home's $6.2 billion in revenues and roughly 13,000 homes delivered. This scale advantage translates into purchasing power on land and materials, broader geographic diversification, and a deeper capital base to withstand cyclical downturns.
Margin profiles further separate the two. DHI reported a homebuilding pre-tax profit margin of 13.8% for fiscal 2025 and an 11.6% consolidated pre-tax margin in the most recent quarter. KBH's homebuilding operating income margin was 6.9% in its most recent quarter (7.8% adjusted). D.R. Horton's higher margin profile reflects its manufacturing-style approach to homebuilding — building speculative inventory to reduce unit costs — versus KB Home's BTO model, which prioritizes customization but carries longer cycle times and lower inventory turnover.
Balance sheet strength also favors DHI. Its debt-to-capital ratio of 18.8% is among the lowest in the industry and significantly below KBH's 30.3%. D.R. Horton's $6.6 billion in total liquidity dwarfs KB Home's $1.43 billion, giving it substantially more dry powder for land acquisition, share repurchases, or navigating a prolonged housing downturn.
However, KBH is not without its own competitive merits. Its built-to-order model reduces the risk of carrying large inventories of unsold completed homes, which can become a liability if demand weakens abruptly. The company's customer satisfaction leadership and sustainability credentials provide brand differentiation. Furthermore, KBH trades at a notably lower price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple than DHI, which may appeal to value-oriented investors, though this discount partly reflects its thinner margins and smaller scale.
In terms of recent momentum, DHI's 3% year-over-year net order growth in the most recent quarter stands in contrast to KBH's 10% net order decline, suggesting the larger builder's affordability-focused product mix and incentive strategy may be resonating more effectively with today's constrained homebuyers.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, balance sheet resilience, margin stability, and relative order momentum, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely favor DHI over KBH in the current market environment. D.R. Horton's unmatched scale, lower leverage, diversified revenue streams, and stabilizing order trends suggest a more consistent trajectory through this housing cycle. While KBH's BTO model and customer-centric approach offer meaningful brand differentiation, its narrower margins, smaller liquidity buffer, and steeper backlog decline introduce comparatively greater uncertainty. That said, market conditions can shift rapidly, and an AI model might reassess its positioning if mortgage rates decline materially — a scenario that could disproportionately benefit builders with significant exposure to entry-level and first-time buyers, a segment both companies serve. As always, the relative attractiveness of each stock depends on evolving fundamentals and the specific risk-reward parameters an investor or trader brings to the decision.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DHI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKBH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DHI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KBH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
DHI (@Homebuilding) experienced а -7.97% price change this week, while KBH (@Homebuilding) price change was -3.79% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Homebuilding industry was -1.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.27%.
DHI is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
KBH is expected to report earnings on Sep 23, 2026.
Homebuilding includes companies residential home construction companies, renovators and repair firms. The companies may be building single-family or multifamily homes, condominiums or mobile homes. Over the five years to 2019, the Home Builders industry is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of 2.5% to reach $89.4 billion, (including expected growth of 2.6% in 2019), according to a study by IbisWorld. After having suffered one of its worst crises a decade ago during the last macroeconomic recession–which had much of its origins in U.S. real estate – the homebuilding industry has been recovering steadily so far. Higher disposable incomes and improving economic activity have bolstered consumers’ purchases of homes. While revenue of the Home Builders industry remains well below its prerecession high, demand growth estimates show promise.
| DHI | KBH | DHI / KBH | |
| Capitalization | 41B | 3.48B | 1,178% |
| EBITDA | 4.03B | 368M | 1,095% |
| Gain YTD | -0.745 | -0.496 | 150% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.99 | 13.81 | 101% |
| Revenue | 33.3B | 5.5B | 605% |
| Total Cash | 1.92B | 201M | 954% |
| Total Debt | 6.63B | 2B | 332% |
DHI | KBH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 31 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 56 Fair valued | 9 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 74 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 63 | 81 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KBH's Valuation (9) in the Homebuilding industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DHI (56). This means that KBH’s stock grew somewhat faster than DHI’s over the last 12 months.
DHI's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as KBH (74). This means that DHI’s stock grew similarly to KBH’s over the last 12 months.
DHI's SMR Rating (63) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as KBH (81). This means that DHI’s stock grew similarly to KBH’s over the last 12 months.
KBH's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as DHI (61). This means that KBH’s stock grew similarly to DHI’s over the last 12 months.
KBH's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as DHI (33). This means that KBH’s stock grew similarly to DHI’s over the last 12 months.
| DHI | KBH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 5 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 73% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DHI has been closely correlated with PHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DHI jumps, then PHM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KBH has been closely correlated with MTH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KBH jumps, then MTH could also see price increases.