NOC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FOWF | NOC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 47% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 48% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 42% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 62% | 11 days ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 62% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that FOWF and NOC have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FOWF and NOC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FOWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOWF | 100% | +0.83% | ||
| NOC - FOWF | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.00% | ||
| AI - FOWF | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.67% | ||
| DOW - FOWF | 9% Poorly correlated | -2.06% | ||
| IBM - FOWF | 7% Poorly correlated | +3.96% | ||
| AMAT - FOWF | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.55% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOC has been closely correlated with LMT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NOC jumps, then LMT could also see price increases.