FTXL
Price
$234.54
Change
-$9.30 (-3.81%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Net Assets
2.27B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SMH
Price
$556.34
Change
-$22.00 (-3.80%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Net Assets
63.04B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTXL vs SMH

Header iconFTXL vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts FTXL vs SMHBanner chart's image
FTXL vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) vs. VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH)

Key Takeaways

  • FTXL employs a smart beta, factor-weighted strategy tracking the Nasdaq US Smart Semiconductor Index, offering broader exposure across ~35 holdings, while SMH uses market-cap weighting for the 25 largest and most liquid US-listed semiconductor firms via the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index.
  • SMH exhibits higher concentration risk with top holdings comprising over 70% of assets, including significant weights in NVDA (~18%) and TSM (~11%), compared to FTXL's more balanced top 10 at ~65% featuring INTC (~12-14%), MU (~8%), and AVGO (~7-8%).
  • Both ETFs maintain nearly 100% allocation to the technology sector, primarily semiconductors, but FTXL's methodology incorporates liquidity and capitalization factors for enhanced diversification.
  • SMH boasts a lower expense ratio of 0.35% versus FTXL's 0.60%, providing cost efficiency for long-term holders despite FTXL's broader portfolio.
  • SMH demonstrates superior liquidity with massive daily volumes, while FTXL offers solid but comparatively lower trading activity, impacting suitability for large trades.
  • Holdings overlap ~60-70% by weight, making them complementary for sector exposure but differentiated by weighting and breadth.

Introduction

Amid surging demand for advanced chips powering artificial intelligence (AI) and data centers, semiconductor ETFs like First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) provide targeted exposure to this high-growth sector. These passive funds track distinct indices, offering investors alternative strategies within the same industry: FTXL's factor-based approach emphasizes smart selection across a wider array of US semiconductor firms, while SMH concentrates on the largest, most liquid players. Comparing them reveals trade-offs in diversification, costs, and concentration, helping investors align with sector momentum driven by hyperscaler capital expenditures and geopolitical supply chain shifts.

First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) Overview

The First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) seeks to mirror the Nasdaq US Smart Semiconductor Index, a modified factor-weighted benchmark designed for exposure to US semiconductor companies selected by liquidity and market capitalization rankings. This passive, smart beta strategy (which uses rules-based factors beyond pure market cap) holds approximately 35 stocks, promoting greater diversification than cap-weighted peers. Top holdings typically include INTC (12-14%), MU (7-9%), AVGO (7-8%), QCOM (~7%), NVDA (~6-7%), MRVL (~6%), AMD (~5%), and others like ON, with the top 10 accounting for ~65% of assets. Sector allocation is overwhelmingly technology (~96-99%), focused on semiconductors and related equipment. The expense ratio stands at 0.60%, with quarterly rebalancing to maintain factor tilts. FTXL distinguishes itself through its emphasis on quality and momentum within the sector.

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) Overview

The VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) aims to replicate the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, a market-cap-weighted index tracking the 25 largest and most liquid US-listed companies involved in semiconductor production and equipment, including ADRs (American Depositary Receipts). This passive fund holds ~25-26 stocks, resulting in high concentration. Leading positions feature NVDA (~18%), TSM (~10-11%), AVGO (~8%), INTC (~7-8%), AMD (~5-7%), and names like ASML, with top 10 weights exceeding 70%. Allocation is nearly 100% to technology/semiconductors. It charges a competitive 0.35% expense ratio and rebalances periodically to reflect liquidity and size criteria. SMH's structure favors industry giants, enhancing exposure to market leaders.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The semiconductor sector thrives amid explosive AI infrastructure demand, with global revenues projected to surpass $1 trillion in 2026, up over 50% year-over-year, propelled by hyperscaler capex nearing $600 billion for data centers, high-bandwidth memory, and logic chips. Key catalysts include AI accelerators from leaders like NVDA and memory surges from MU. Capital flows heavily favor ETFs like SMH and FTXL, reflecting $5+ billion monthly inflows into semis funds. The CHIPS and Science Act (CHIPS Act, a US law providing subsidies for domestic manufacturing) has spurred over $640 billion in supply chain investments across 30 states, bolstering onshoring amid US-China tensions. Risks encompass cyclicality, "memflation" (memory price inflation), geopolitical export controls, and power constraints for AI buildouts, yet macro tailwinds from cloud expansion persist.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, SMH has demonstrated stronger relative positioning, benefiting from outsized gains in mega-cap leaders like NVDA amid AI hype and hyperscaler spending surges, often outpacing FTXL by wide margins over multi-year horizons. FTXL, with its factor tilt, has shown resilience in broader rallies but lagged during mega-cap rotations due to heavier exposure to laggards like INTC. Both exhibit high volatility tied to sector earnings cycles, interest rate sensitivity (as capex-intensive), and commodity trends in rare earths. SMH's concentration amplifies upside in momentum-driven environments, while FTXL's diversification tempers drawdowns; recent weeks highlight SMH's edge in AI-fueled advances, though overlap (~60%) limits differentiation.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap, total value of a company's shares), technical indicators like moving averages, price patterns including breakouts, and performance metrics like relative strength. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions in volatile sectors like semiconductors. Explore it today to uncover hidden gems aligned with AI trends.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors SMH with moderate conviction (~65% probability edge), owing to its lower expense ratio, superior liquidity, precise tracking of top-tier semiconductor momentum leaders, and stronger trend consistency in recent AI-driven cycles. While FTXL's diversification mitigates concentration risk, SMH's cost efficiency and positioning in high-conviction growth areas like AI chips provide a structural advantage for sector exposure.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FTXL vs. SMH commentary
May 18, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTXL is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 63B vs. FTXL (2.27B). FTXL has a higher annual dividend yield than SMH: FTXL (81.079) vs SMH (54.483). FTXL was incepted earlier than SMH: FTXL (10 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than FTXL (0.60). FTXL has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
FTXLSMHFTXL / SMH
Gain YTD81.07954.483149%
Net Assets2.27B63B4%
Total Expense Ratio0.600.35171%
Turnover19.0012.00158%
Yield0.160.2275%
Fund Existence10 years14 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTXLSMH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FTXL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MBSF25.670.06
+0.22%
Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF
TMSF50.08N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF
FJUN59.47-0.04
-0.06%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Jun
ZJAN27.88-0.03
-0.10%
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January
HYSA14.87-0.03
-0.20%
BondBloxx USD High Yld Bd Sect Rot ETF

FTXL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTXL has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTXL jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTXL
1D Price
Change %
FTXL100%
-3.81%
LRCX - FTXL
84%
Closely correlated
-4.82%
AMAT - FTXL
82%
Closely correlated
-0.89%
MPWR - FTXL
79%
Closely correlated
-3.96%
KLAC - FTXL
79%
Closely correlated
-4.68%
MU - FTXL
78%
Closely correlated
-6.62%
More