FTXL
Price
$264.08
Change
+$1.61 (+0.61%)
Updated
Oct 6, 11:02 AM (EDT)
Net Assets
1.45B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SMH
Price
$638.52
Change
+$4.62 (+0.73%)
Updated
Oct 6, 11:09 AM (EDT)
Net Assets
77.81B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTXL vs SMH

FTXL vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 06, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) vs. VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH)

Key Takeaways

  • FTXL tracks a multi-factor smart beta index emphasizing liquidity, value, volatility, and growth among U.S. semiconductor stocks, resulting in a broader portfolio of approximately 35 holdings compared to SMH’s concentrated selection of 25-27 names.
  • SMH follows a market-cap-weighted index of the largest and most liquid U.S.-listed semiconductor companies, delivering lower costs at 0.35% expense ratio versus FTXL’s 0.60% and greater exposure to international leaders through American Depositary Receipts (ADRs).
  • Both ETFs provide pure-play exposure to the semiconductor industry but differ in diversification: FTXL spreads risk across more holdings with a stronger domestic focus, while SMH concentrates in top-tier global players including Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSM) and ASML Holding.
  • Structural distinctions position SMH for investors seeking cost-efficient, high-conviction exposure to industry leaders, whereas FTXL appeals to those favoring factor-tilted selection and potentially wider representation within the sector.
  • Rebalancing methodologies vary, with FTXL reconstituted semi-annually under its smart index rules and SMH maintaining a rules-based approach focused on the 25 largest qualifying securities.
  • Liquidity profiles favor SMH due to substantially larger assets under management, though both trade on major U.S. exchanges with adequate volume for most investors.

Introduction

The semiconductor sector remains central to technological advancement, powering artificial intelligence, data centers, consumer electronics, and automotive applications. First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) both target this dynamic industry yet employ distinct methodologies, making them relevant alternatives rather than direct competitors. Investors comparing these exchange-traded funds (ETFs) can evaluate differences in index construction, concentration levels, cost structures, and geographic exposure to align portfolios with specific risk tolerances and thematic objectives within the broader technology landscape.

First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) Overview

First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) seeks to replicate the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index, a rules-based benchmark that selects highly liquid U.S. semiconductor companies and weights them according to factors including cash flow, value, volatility, and growth. The ETF holds approximately 35 securities, offering broader diversification within the sector than more concentrated peers. Top holdings typically include Intel Corporation (INTC), Micron Technology (MU), QUALCOMM (QCOM), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA), and Broadcom (AVGO), with allocations varying by rebalancing. Allocations remain focused on information technology, primarily U.S.-listed issuers. As a passive, open-ended fund, FTXL features an expense ratio of 0.60% and undergoes semi-annual index reconstitution and rebalancing. Its multi-factor approach distinguishes it from pure market-cap strategies, aiming to capture additional return drivers while maintaining sector purity.

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) Overview

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) tracks the MVIS U.S. Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, which targets the 25 largest and most liquid U.S.-listed companies primarily engaged in semiconductor production and equipment. The fund maintains a concentrated portfolio of 25-27 holdings, with significant weight in leading names such as NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA), Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSM), Broadcom (AVGO), Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), and Micron Technology (MU). Exposure extends internationally through ADRs of companies like TSM and ASML Holding. SMH operates as a passive, open-ended ETF with a lower expense ratio of 0.35%. The index methodology emphasizes market capitalization and liquidity, resulting in a focused bet on industry leaders. Rebalancing occurs periodically to maintain the constituent list, supporting efficient tracking of the semiconductor theme.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The semiconductor industry benefits from sustained demand driven by artificial intelligence infrastructure buildout, 5G deployment, electric vehicle adoption, and advanced computing needs. Capital expenditures by major chipmakers continue to support equipment suppliers, while supply chain normalization and geopolitical considerations influence capacity expansions. Regulatory developments around export controls and technology leadership add complexity, particularly for firms with international operations. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate trajectories and corporate spending cycles affect capital-intensive segments. Both ETFs operate within this environment, where innovation cycles and end-market growth provide long-term tailwinds alongside periodic volatility from inventory adjustments and competitive dynamics.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, the concentrated structure of VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has aligned closely with the performance of top semiconductor leaders, potentially amplifying gains during periods of strong momentum in names like NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) while introducing higher volatility. First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL), with its broader holdings and factor overlays, has offered a somewhat moderated profile through greater representation of mid-tier and value-oriented semiconductor firms. Relative positioning reflects differences in top-weight concentration and international exposure: SMH’s inclusion of leading global foundries and equipment makers provides diversified revenue streams, whereas FTXL’s U.S.-centric multi-factor selection emphasizes domestic liquidity and growth characteristics. Over recent weeks and months, sector rotation tied to earnings seasons and macroeconomic signals has influenced both funds, with SMH typically exhibiting tighter correlation to flagship chipmakers and FTXL displaying slightly wider dispersion across the value chain.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to refine your investment research.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including lower expense ratio, high-concentration access to leading global semiconductor names, and substantial liquidity, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) for investors seeking efficient thematic exposure. First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) presents a compelling alternative where broader diversification and factor-based selection align with portfolio construction goals. Selection ultimately depends on individual objectives regarding cost, concentration, and geographic breadth within the semiconductor sector.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FTXL vs. SMH commentary
Oct 06, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTXL is a Buy and SMH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTXLSMH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
FTXL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KLRA10.840.45
+4.33%
Kailera Therapeutics Inc
RPAY3.900.08
+2.09%
Repay Holdings Corp
UBS48.180.47
+0.99%
UBS Group AG
MTDR53.01-0.49
-0.92%
Matador Resources Company
MLCI3.33-0.10
-2.92%
Mount Logan Capital Inc

FTXL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTXL has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTXL jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTXL
1D Price
Change %
FTXL100%
-0.30%
LRCX - FTXL
89%
Closely correlated
-0.49%
AMAT - FTXL
85%
Closely correlated
+0.41%
KLAC - FTXL
84%
Closely correlated
-0.02%
MU - FTXL
83%
Closely correlated
-1.02%
ENTG - FTXL
83%
Closely correlated
+0.27%
More

SMH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMH
1D Price
Change %
SMH100%
+0.52%
LRCX - SMH
89%
Closely correlated
-0.49%
AMAT - SMH
86%
Closely correlated
+0.41%
KLAC - SMH
85%
Closely correlated
-0.02%
TSM - SMH
84%
Closely correlated
+2.75%
ASML - SMH
84%
Closely correlated
-0.40%
More