GPI
Price
$451.16
Change
-$17.26 (-3.68%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
3.96B
60 days until earnings call
PAG
Price
$163.59
Change
-$4.33 (-2.58%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
10.86B
60 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GPI vs PAG

Header iconGPI vs PAG Comparison
Open Charts GPI vs PAGBanner chart's image
Group 1 Automotive
Price$451.16
Change-$17.26 (-3.68%)
Volume$150.86K
Capitalization3.96B
Penske Automotive Group
Price$163.59
Change-$4.33 (-2.58%)
Volume$276.08K
Capitalization10.86B
GPI vs PAG Comparison Chart
Loading...
GPI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GPI vs. PAG commentary
Feb 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPI is a Hold and PAG is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 22, 2025
Stock price -- (GPI: $468.42 vs. PAG: $167.92)
Brand notoriety: GPI and PAG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GPI: 167% vs. PAG: 101%
Market capitalization -- GPI: $3.96B vs. PAG: $10.86B
GPI [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $3.96B. PAG’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $10.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $9.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GPI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePAG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GPI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PAG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GPI and PAG are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GPI’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GPI’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PAG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAG is a better buy in the short-term than GPI.

Price Growth

GPI (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -3.23% price change this week, while PAG (@Specialty Stores) price change was -4.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -3.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

GPI is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

PAG is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-3.58% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAG($10.9B) has a higher market cap than GPI($3.96B). PAG has higher P/E ratio than GPI: PAG (10.37) vs GPI (6.77). GPI YTD gains are higher at: 11.137 vs. PAG (10.155). PAG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.79B vs. GPI (1.06B). PAG has more cash in the bank: 96.4M vs. GPI (57.2M). GPI has less debt than PAG: GPI (3.9B) vs PAG (7.74B). PAG has higher revenues than GPI: PAG (29.5B) vs GPI (17.9B).
GPIPAGGPI / PAG
Capitalization3.96B10.9B36%
EBITDA1.06B1.79B59%
Gain YTD11.13710.155110%
P/E Ratio6.7710.3765%
Revenue17.9B29.5B61%
Total Cash57.2M96.4M59%
Total Debt3.9B7.74B50%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GPI vs PAG: Fundamental Ratings
GPI
PAG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7165
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
25
SMR RATING
1..100
5050
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4048
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
826
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAG's Valuation (91) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as GPI (93). This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to GPI’s over the last 12 months.

GPI's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as PAG (5). This means that GPI’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.

GPI's SMR Rating (50) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as PAG (50). This means that GPI’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.

GPI's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as PAG (48). This means that GPI’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.

GPI's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as PAG (26). This means that GPI’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GPIPAG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GPI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLRBX22.87N/A
N/A
James Balanced: Golden Rainbow R
GFACX67.80N/A
N/A
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
CVMCX17.35N/A
N/A
Calvert Emerging Markets Equity C
AAWEX15.14N/A
N/A
Cavanal Hill World Energy A
AASRX24.89-0.20
-0.80%
American Beacon Small Cap Value R6

PAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAG has been closely correlated with GPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAG jumps, then GPI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAG
1D Price
Change %
PAG100%
-0.98%
GPI - PAG
85%
Closely correlated
-0.14%
ABG - PAG
82%
Closely correlated
-2.36%
SAH - PAG
82%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
AN - PAG
76%
Closely correlated
-0.39%
LAD - PAG
71%
Closely correlated
-0.97%
More