Advertisement
HUBS vs KARO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUBS is a StrongBuy and KARO is a StrongBuy.
| HUBS | KARO | HUBS / KARO | |
| Capitalization | 12.5B | 2.08B | 602% |
| EBITDA | 333M | 1.49B | 22% |
| Gain YTD | -37.550 | 51.240 | -73% |
| P/E Ratio | 89.19 | 32.68 | 273% |
| Revenue | 3.45B | 5.77B | 60% |
| Total Cash | 1.34B | 1.11B | 121% |
| Total Debt | 237M | 1.07B | 22% |
HUBS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| HUBS | KARO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 4 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 4 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 4 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 73% | 6 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 4 days ago 78% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HUBS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while KARO’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- KARO’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HUBS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KARO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HUBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- KARO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
HUBS (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.22% price change this week, while KARO (@Packaged Software) price change was +2.67% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.37%.
Reported Earning Dates
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
KARO is expected to report earnings on Oct 08, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.20% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QABA | 67.92 | 0.27 | +0.40% |
| First Trust NASDAQ® ABA Community Bk ETF | |||
| TBUX | 49.77 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF | |||
| AGRW | 32.11 | N/A | N/A |
| Allspring LT Large Growth ETF | |||
| MCI | 19.12 | -0.42 | -2.15% |
| Barings Corporate Investors | |||
| UBOT | 21.30 | -0.59 | -2.70% |
| Direxion Dly Rbtc AI Atmtn Bl 2X ETF | |||
KARO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KARO has been loosely correlated with NCNO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KARO jumps, then NCNO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KARO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KARO | 100% | +3.78% | ||
| NCNO - KARO | 35% Loosely correlated | +4.38% | ||
| QTWO - KARO | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.74% | ||
| MANH - KARO | 35% Loosely correlated | +4.82% | ||
| HUBS - KARO | 34% Loosely correlated | +11.22% | ||
| VERX - KARO | 34% Loosely correlated | +6.77% | ||
More | ||||