Advertisement
HUBS vs TEAM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? HubSpot (HUBS) vs. Atlassian (TEAM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both HUBS and TEAM have delivered strong year-to-date gains of around 40%, reflecting resilience in the SaaS (software as a service) sector amid market volatility.
- TEAM recently surged nearly 30% following a blowout quarterly earnings report, showcasing robust cloud growth and AI integrations.
- HUBS exhibits high profitability with a positive EPS (earnings per share), but trades at a premium valuation with a trailing P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio over 270.
- Tickeron's analysis indicates TEAM as the stronger long-term buy based on comparative growth trends.
- Investor sentiment favors both amid SaaS recovery, though TEAM's lower beta (market volatility measure) suggests relatively lower risk.
- Upcoming catalysts include HUBS's earnings and broader AI adoption across both platforms.
Introduction
HubSpot (HUBS) and Atlassian (TEAM) represent key players in the SaaS ecosystem, with HUBS focusing on CRM (customer relationship management) and marketing automation, and TEAM excelling in team collaboration and project management tools. This comparison is particularly relevant for growth-oriented investors and traders navigating the tech sector's recovery, evaluating relative performance, valuation trade-offs, and momentum in recent market activity. By examining business models, recent trends, and market positioning, readers can gauge which stock aligns better with current conditions.
HUBS Overview and Recent Performance
HubSpot provides a cloud-based CRM platform encompassing marketing, sales, service, and operations hubs, targeting mid-market B2B companies. In recent weeks, HUBS shares have shown volatility, trading around $240 with a market cap of approximately $12.3 billion. Year-to-date gains stand at over 40%, though the stock remains well below its 52-week high of $682, reflecting broader SaaS pressures earlier in the period. Positive sentiment stems from AI enhancements like Breeze for content generation and data insights, alongside analyst upgrades from firms like Morgan Stanley citing buying opportunities. Upcoming earnings are anticipated to drive further movement, supported by revenue growth to $3.13 billion trailing twelve months (TTM) and net income of $46 million TTM.
TEAM Overview and Recent Performance
Atlassian offers collaboration software including Jira for project management, Confluence for knowledge sharing, and emerging AI tools like Rovo. Shares recently traded near $95, with a market cap of about $25 billion. Year-to-date performance mirrors HUBS at roughly 41%, bolstered by a sharp post-earnings rally of nearly 30% in early May after Q3 results exceeded expectations—revenue hit $1.79 billion (up 32% year-over-year) and adjusted EPS reached $1.75. Cloud migration and data center strength have fueled optimism, despite TTM net losses. The 52-week range of $56 to $232 underscores volatility, but recent momentum and a lower beta of 0.90 indicate improved stability.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates the top performers from over 350 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. Only 25 bots earn a spot in this section, selected by AI for superior adaptation to current market volatility, showcasing diverse strategies from short-term scalping to long-term swings. Standout stats include annualized returns up to +162%, win rates ranging from 51% to 88%, profit factors of 1.5 to 11.7, and drawdown ratios exceeding 17 in top cases. These bots employ varied timeframes (1 day to 49 days) and focus on sectors like semiconductors and finance. Traders can explore and copy these high performers to enhance strategies—visit the page for real-time insights.
Head-to-Head Comparison
HUBS emphasizes inbound marketing and CRM automation, contrasting TEAM's developer-centric tools for agile workflows and enterprise agility. Growth drivers include subscription revenue—HUBS at $3.13 billion TTM with profitability, versus TEAM's $6.19 billion TTM amid cloud acceleration. Recent momentum favors TEAM post-earnings surge, while HUBS holds steadier YTD positioning. Risk factors involve macroeconomic sensitivity and AI competition; TEAM's higher debt-to-equity (141%) contrasts HUBS' cash reserves of $1.7 billion. Market sentiment leans positive for both in SaaS recovery, with TEAM showing stronger analyst price targets.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI currently favors TEAM due to superior recent trend consistency, earnings catalysts, and cloud momentum positioning it ahead in volatile conditions. While HUBS offers profitability and AI innovation, TEAM's relative outperformance suggests higher probability of near-term upside, though both warrant monitoring for sector shifts.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUBS is a StrongBuy and TEAM is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HUBS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTEAM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TEAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HUBS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TEAM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HUBS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TEAM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
HUBS (@Packaged Software) experienced а -3.62% price change this week, while TEAM (@Packaged Software) price change was -7.56% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -8.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.53%.
Reported Earning Dates
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
TEAM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-8.45% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| HUBS | TEAM | HUBS / TEAM | |
| Capitalization | 10.9B | 25.2B | 43% |
| EBITDA | 267M | -21.17M | -1,261% |
| Gain YTD | -47.012 | -38.652 | 122% |
| P/E Ratio | 111.92 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 3.3B | 6.19B | 53% |
| Total Cash | 1.69B | 1.14B | 149% |
| Total Debt | 247M | 1.24B | 20% |
HUBS | TEAM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 86 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 20 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HUBS's Valuation (80) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as TEAM (98). This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as TEAM (100). This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's SMR Rating (86) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as TEAM (97). This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
TEAM's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as HUBS (85). This means that TEAM’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
TEAM's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Information Technology Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for HUBS (95). This means that TEAM’s stock grew significantly faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
| HUBS | TEAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 74% | 8 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 77% |
Advertisement
HUBS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUBS | 100% | -3.51% | ||
| CRM - HUBS | 79% Closely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| TEAM - HUBS | 71% Closely correlated | -2.00% | ||
| FRSH - HUBS | 67% Closely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| NOW - HUBS | 66% Closely correlated | -5.79% | ||
| S - HUBS | 66% Loosely correlated | -3.51% | ||
More | ||||
TEAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TEAM has been closely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TEAM jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TEAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEAM | 100% | -2.00% | ||
| HUBS - TEAM | 72% Closely correlated | -3.51% | ||
| WDAY - TEAM | 72% Closely correlated | -2.45% | ||
| CRM - TEAM | 72% Closely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| FRSH - TEAM | 70% Closely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| SPT - TEAM | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.03% | ||
More | ||||