HUBS
Price
$483.17
Change
+$6.83 (+1.43%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
25.46B
65 days until earnings call
TEAM
Price
$177.78
Change
+$1.00 (+0.57%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
46.64B
59 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HUBS vs TEAM

Header iconHUBS vs TEAM Comparison
Open Charts HUBS vs TEAMBanner chart's image
HUBSPOT
Price$483.17
Change+$6.83 (+1.43%)
Volume$817.6K
Capitalization25.46B
Atlassian
Price$177.78
Change+$1.00 (+0.57%)
Volume$2.89M
Capitalization46.64B
HUBS vs TEAM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TEAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HUBS vs. TEAM commentary
Sep 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUBS is a Buy and TEAM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 01, 2025
Stock price -- (HUBS: $483.17 vs. TEAM: $177.78)
Brand notoriety: HUBS: Not notable vs. TEAM: Notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HUBS: 91% vs. TEAM: 121%
Market capitalization -- HUBS: $25.46B vs. TEAM: $46.64B
HUBS [@Packaged Software] is valued at $25.46B. TEAM’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $46.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $320.59B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HUBS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTEAM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TEAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TEAM is a better buy in the long-term than HUBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HUBS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TEAM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HUBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • TEAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HUBS is a better buy in the short-term than TEAM.

Price Growth

HUBS (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.87% price change this week, while TEAM (@Packaged Software) price change was +4.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

HUBS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

TEAM is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-0.62% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEAM($46.6B) has a higher market cap than HUBS($25.5B). TEAM YTD gains are higher at: -26.954 vs. HUBS (-30.656). HUBS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 126M vs. TEAM (24M). TEAM has more cash in the bank: 2.94B vs. HUBS (1.67B). HUBS has less debt than TEAM: HUBS (281M) vs TEAM (1.24B). TEAM has higher revenues than HUBS: TEAM (5.22B) vs HUBS (2.85B).
HUBSTEAMHUBS / TEAM
Capitalization25.5B46.6B55%
EBITDA126M24M525%
Gain YTD-30.656-26.954114%
P/E Ratio7023.44N/A-
Revenue2.85B5.22B55%
Total Cash1.67B2.94B57%
Total Debt281M1.24B23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HUBS vs TEAM: Fundamental Ratings
HUBS
TEAM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6999
SMR RATING
1..100
9195
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8464
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8016
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TEAM's Valuation (98) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as HUBS (100). This means that TEAM’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

HUBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as TEAM (99). This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to TEAM’s over the last 12 months.

HUBS's SMR Rating (91) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as TEAM (95). This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to TEAM’s over the last 12 months.

TEAM's Price Growth Rating (64) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as HUBS (84). This means that TEAM’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

TEAM's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (80). This means that TEAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HUBSTEAM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TEAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
COAL20.470.20
+0.99%
Range Global Coal ETF
TOTL40.350.02
+0.05%
SPDR® DoubleLine® Total Return Tact ETF
TVAL33.71-0.03
-0.07%
T. Rowe Price Value ETF
SSPY85.50-0.17
-0.20%
Stratified LargeCap Index ETF
UBRL32.83-1.62
-4.70%
GraniteShares 2x Long UBER Daily ETF

HUBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUBS
1D Price
Change %
HUBS100%
+1.43%
CRM - HUBS
71%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
TEAM - HUBS
71%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
NOW - HUBS
68%
Closely correlated
-1.20%
S - HUBS
66%
Loosely correlated
+7.10%
CLSK - HUBS
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
More