LW
Price
$59.33
Change
-$0.17 (-0.29%)
Updated
Dec 2, 10:33 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.29B
17 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MDLZ
Price
$55.96
Change
-$0.44 (-0.78%)
Updated
Dec 2, 10:34 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
72.78B
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LW vs MDLZ

Header iconLW vs MDLZ Comparison
Open Charts LW vs MDLZBanner chart's image
Lamb Weston Holdings
Price$59.33
Change-$0.17 (-0.29%)
Volume$1.28K
Capitalization8.29B
Mondelez International
Price$55.96
Change-$0.44 (-0.78%)
Volume$12.76K
Capitalization72.78B
LW vs MDLZ Comparison Chart in %
LW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MDLZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LW vs. MDLZ commentary
Dec 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LW is a StrongBuy and MDLZ is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 02, 2025
Stock price -- (LW: $59.50 vs. MDLZ: $56.40)
Brand notoriety: LW: Not notable vs. MDLZ: Notable
LW represents the Food: Major Diversified, while MDLZ is part of the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LW: 53% vs. MDLZ: 149%
Market capitalization -- LW: $8.29B vs. MDLZ: $72.78B
LW [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $8.29B. MDLZ’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $72.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $256.36B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $72.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.1B. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $14.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMDLZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MDLZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LW is a better buy in the long-term than MDLZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDLZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MDLZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LW and MDLZ are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LW (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +5.27% price change this week, while MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +0.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.29%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

LW is expected to report earnings on Dec 19, 2025.

MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+1.58% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.05% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDLZ($72.8B) has a higher market cap than LW($8.29B). LW has higher P/E ratio than MDLZ: LW (28.61) vs MDLZ (21.12). MDLZ YTD gains are higher at: -3.481 vs. LW (-8.658). MDLZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.6B vs. LW (1.02B). MDLZ has more cash in the bank: 1.37B vs. LW (98.6M). LW has less debt than MDLZ: LW (3.99B) vs MDLZ (21.9B). MDLZ has higher revenues than LW: MDLZ (37.6B) vs LW (6.46B).
LWMDLZLW / MDLZ
Capitalization8.29B72.8B11%
EBITDA1.02B5.6B18%
Gain YTD-8.658-3.481249%
P/E Ratio28.6121.12135%
Revenue6.46B37.6B17%
Total Cash98.6M1.37B7%
Total Debt3.99B21.9B18%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LW vs MDLZ: Fundamental Ratings
LW
MDLZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
546
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10069
SMR RATING
1..100
5058
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5961
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1250
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MDLZ's Valuation (35) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LW (36) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LW (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

LW's SMR Rating (50) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as MDLZ (58) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.

LW's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as MDLZ (61) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.

LW's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDLZ (50) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LWMDLZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MDLZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SVAYX29.26N/A
N/A
SEI Large Cap Value Y (SIMT)
HNDDX81.50N/A
N/A
Horizon Equity Premium Income Investor
AZNIX12.44N/A
N/A
Virtus Income & Growth Inst
TBWCX21.00-0.08
-0.38%
Thornburg Better World International C
RGACX85.35-0.63
-0.73%
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3

LW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LW has been loosely correlated with CAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LW jumps, then CAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LW
1D Price
Change %
LW100%
+0.75%
CAG - LW
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.01%
FLO - LW
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.30%
INGR - LW
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
GIS - LW
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
KHC - LW
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.55%
More

MDLZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDLZ has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDLZ jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MDLZ
1D Price
Change %
MDLZ100%
-2.03%
GIS - MDLZ
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
CAG - MDLZ
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.01%
CPB - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
KHC - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.55%
MKC - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.60%
More