Advertisement
MNST vs PEP
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) vs. PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) has significantly outperformed PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) over the past year, with returns exceeding 55% compared to PEP’s near-flat or slightly negative performance.
- PEP reported mixed second-quarter 2026 results, with revenue beating estimates but earnings per share missing, contributing to a stock decline of approximately 3-4% in recent weeks.
- MNST benefits from strong demand in the energy drink segment, supporting its relative momentum amid broader consumer staples challenges.
- PEP offers greater diversification across beverages and snacks but faces headwinds from North American consumer spending pressures.
- Valuation metrics show PEP trading at a discount to peers, while MNST reflects premium positioning tied to growth in its core category.
- Market sentiment favors MNST’s recent trajectory, though both stocks operate in a competitive consumer staples environment with varying risk profiles.
Introduction
This comparison examines Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) and PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP), two prominent players in the consumer staples sector. MNST focuses primarily on energy drinks, while PEP encompasses a broader portfolio of beverages and snacks. Investors and traders seeking to understand relative performance, sector dynamics, and positioning within the beverage industry may find this analysis relevant. The discussion highlights recent market activity, business models, and observable trends without making forward-looking predictions.
MNST Overview and Recent Performance
Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) develops, markets, and distributes energy drinks and related beverages. In recent market activity, the stock has demonstrated notable strength, posting substantial gains over the trailing twelve months that outpaced broader market benchmarks and peers. This performance aligns with sustained consumer interest in energy products. Recent weeks have seen continued positive momentum for MNST, supported by its focused business model and category leadership. Sentiment has remained constructive amid steady volume trends and limited exposure to the diversified challenges affecting larger food and beverage conglomerates.
PEP Overview and Recent Performance
PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) produces and distributes a wide range of beverages, snacks, and related products globally. Recent market activity shows the stock under pressure, with declines observed following second-quarter 2026 earnings that featured a revenue beat but an earnings per share miss. Over the past thirty days through mid-July 2026, PEP shares fell approximately 3.4%, extending a broader downtrend. The company reiterated its full-year outlook despite mixed results, reflecting resilience in international markets offset by domestic consumer caution. Sentiment has been tempered by these factors, with the stock trading near lower levels of its recent range.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page highlights select AI trading bots from a large library of hundreds of options that trade thousands of different tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions earn placement in this curated section. Available bots encompass diverse trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics, including reported annualized returns ranging from modest single digits to over 50% in select forward-tested cases, along with metrics such as Sharpe ratios and profit factors. These tools enable users to explore varied approaches suited to different market environments. Review the Trending AI Robots section for detailed bot profiles and statistics.
Head-to-Head Comparison
MNST operates a concentrated business model centered on energy beverages, providing exposure to a high-growth subcategory within consumer staples, whereas PEP maintains a diversified portfolio spanning carbonated drinks, snacks, and international operations. Recent momentum favors MNST, which has delivered stronger year-to-date and trailing returns compared to PEP’s more modest or negative results amid earnings volatility. Risk factors differ: MNST contends with category-specific competition and regulatory scrutiny on energy products, while PEP faces broader pressures from input costs, consumer spending shifts, and execution across multiple segments. Sector exposure positions both within defensive staples, yet MNST’s narrower focus has translated to comparatively resilient sentiment in recent periods. Market positioning reflects MNST’s growth-oriented profile against PEP’s value characteristics and dividend appeal.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors including trend consistency and relative performance, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favor to MNST. Its stronger recent momentum and category alignment contrast with PEP’s mixed earnings response and broader headwinds. This assessment draws from verifiable price behavior and positioning rather than forecasts, acknowledging that market conditions can shift and outcomes remain probabilistic.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNST is a Hold and PEP is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MNST’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePEP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- MNST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PEP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MNST’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PEP’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MNST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PEP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
MNST (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -2.85% price change this week, while PEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was -3.29% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -4.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.17%.
Reported Earning Dates
MNST is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
PEP is expected to report earnings on Oct 13, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-4.03% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
| MNST | PEP | MNST / PEP | |
| Capitalization | 92.4B | 189B | 49% |
| EBITDA | 2.71B | 18.6B | 15% |
| Gain YTD | 23.203 | -1.413 | -1,643% |
| P/E Ratio | 45.63 | 18.19 | 251% |
| Revenue | 8.79B | 96.9B | 9% |
| Total Cash | 2.99B | 10.7B | 28% |
| Total Debt | 199M | 53.2B | 0% |
MNST | PEP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 87 Overvalued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 86 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 37 | 20 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 3 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PEP's Valuation (17) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is significantly better than the same rating for MNST (87). This means that PEP’s stock grew significantly faster than MNST’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is significantly better than the same rating for PEP (86). This means that MNST’s stock grew significantly faster than PEP’s over the last 12 months.
PEP's SMR Rating (20) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MNST (37). This means that PEP’s stock grew similarly to MNST’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PEP (61). This means that MNST’s stock grew similarly to PEP’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PEP (82). This means that MNST’s stock grew somewhat faster than PEP’s over the last 12 months.
| MNST | PEP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 46% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 40% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 44% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 45% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 9 days ago 39% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 46% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 32% |
Advertisement
MNST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNST has been loosely correlated with CCEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNST jumps, then CCEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNST | 100% | +0.30% | ||
| CCEP - MNST | 45% Loosely correlated | +2.31% | ||
| PEP - MNST | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| KDP - MNST | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.13% | ||
| FIZZ - MNST | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.38% | ||
| CELH - MNST | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.32% | ||
More | ||||
PEP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PEP has been loosely correlated with KDP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PEP jumps, then KDP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PEP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEP | 100% | -0.23% | ||
| KDP - PEP | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.13% | ||
| CCEP - PEP | 39% Loosely correlated | +2.31% | ||
| FIZZ - PEP | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.38% | ||
| MNST - PEP | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.30% | ||
| COKE - PEP | 24% Poorly correlated | +2.07% | ||
More | ||||