MNST
Price
$59.36
Change
+$0.32 (+0.54%)
Updated
Apr 2 closing price
Capitalization
62.08B
28 days until earnings call
PEP
Price
$149.12
Change
-$0.55 (-0.37%)
Updated
Apr 2 closing price
Capitalization
240.55B
21 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MNST vs PEP

Header iconMNST vs PEP Comparison
Open Charts MNST vs PEPBanner chart's image
Monster Beverage
Price$59.36
Change+$0.32 (+0.54%)
Volume$4.63M
Capitalization62.08B
Pepsi
Price$149.12
Change-$0.55 (-0.37%)
Volume$5.87M
Capitalization240.55B
MNST vs PEP Comparison Chart
Loading...
MNST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PEP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNST vs. PEP commentary
Apr 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNST is a Buy and PEP is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 03, 2025
Stock price -- (MNST: $59.04 vs. PEP: $149.67)
Brand notoriety: MNST: Not notable vs. PEP: Notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNST: 79% vs. PEP: 83%
Market capitalization -- MNST: $62.08B vs. PEP: $240.55B
MNST [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $62.08B. PEP’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $240.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $263.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $23.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNST’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePEP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MNST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PEP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNST is a better buy in the long-term than PEP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MNST’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PEP’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MNST’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PEP’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PEP is a better buy in the short-term than MNST.

Price Growth

MNST (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +2.07% price change this week, while PEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +2.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

MNST is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

PEP is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+0.49% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEP($241B) has a higher market cap than MNST($62.1B). MNST has higher P/E ratio than PEP: MNST (37.49) vs PEP (26.37). MNST YTD gains are higher at: 12.938 vs. PEP (-1.066). PEP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.8B vs. MNST (2.02B). PEP has more cash in the bank: 10B vs. MNST (3.25B). MNST has less debt than PEP: MNST (30.3M) vs PEP (44.7B). PEP has higher revenues than MNST: PEP (91.5B) vs MNST (7.14B).
MNSTPEPMNST / PEP
Capitalization62.1B241B26%
EBITDA2.02B15.8B13%
Gain YTD12.938-1.066-1,213%
P/E Ratio37.4926.37142%
Revenue7.14B91.5B8%
Total Cash3.25B10B33%
Total Debt30.3M44.7B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNST vs PEP: Fundamental Ratings
MNST
PEP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2471
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1945
SMR RATING
1..100
4319
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4458
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4168
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PEP's Valuation (28) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNST (90). This means that PEP’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNST’s over the last 12 months.

MNST's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PEP (45). This means that MNST’s stock grew similarly to PEP’s over the last 12 months.

PEP's SMR Rating (19) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MNST (43). This means that PEP’s stock grew similarly to MNST’s over the last 12 months.

MNST's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PEP (58). This means that MNST’s stock grew similarly to PEP’s over the last 12 months.

MNST's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PEP (68). This means that MNST’s stock grew similarly to PEP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MNSTPEP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
38%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
39%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MNST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PEP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MBUU31.610.99
+3.23%
Malibu Boats
INBX14.100.05
+0.36%
Inhibrx Biosciences Inc.
IRT21.380.02
+0.09%
Independence Realty Trust
QSR66.89-0.28
-0.42%
Restaurant Brands International
EDTK1.01N/A
-0.48%
Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited

MNST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNST has been loosely correlated with PEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNST jumps, then PEP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNST
1D Price
Change %
MNST100%
+0.54%
PEP - MNST
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
KO - MNST
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
KDP - MNST
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
CCEP - MNST
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
CELH - MNST
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.85%
More

PEP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PEP has been loosely correlated with KO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PEP jumps, then KO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PEP
1D Price
Change %
PEP100%
-0.37%
KO - PEP
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
KDP - PEP
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
MNST - PEP
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
FIZZ - PEP
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.47%
CCEP - PEP
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
More