MC
Price
$68.51
Change
+$0.22 (+0.32%)
Updated
Aug 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.07B
71 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MS
Price
$214.03
Change
-$0.17 (-0.08%)
Updated
Aug 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
336.23B
50 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MC vs MS

MC vs MS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MC vs. MS commentary
Aug 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MC is a StrongBuy and MS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 25, 2026
Stock price -- (MC: $68.50 vs. MS: $214.08)
Brand notoriety: MC: Not notable vs. MS: Notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MC: 63% vs. MS: 63%
Market capitalization -- MC: $5.07B vs. MS: $336.23B
MC [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $5.07B. MS’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $336.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $13.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MS is a better buy in the long-term than MC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MC is a better buy in the short-term than MS.

Price Growth

MC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +2.65% price change this week, while MS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -1.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +6.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

MC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

MS is expected to report earnings on Oct 14, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+6.15% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MS($336B) has a higher market cap than MC($5.08B). MC has higher P/E ratio than MS: MC (23.87) vs MS (17.29). MS YTD gains are higher at: 22.575 vs. MC (2.660). MS has more cash in the bank: 4.29B vs. MC (80.8M). MC has less debt than MS: MC (263M) vs MS (394B). MS has higher revenues than MC: MS (68.8B) vs MC (1.57B).
MCMSMC / MS
Capitalization5.08B336B2%
EBITDA304MN/A-
Gain YTD2.66022.57512%
P/E Ratio23.8717.29138%
Revenue1.57B68.8B2%
Total Cash80.8M4.29B2%
Total Debt263M394B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MC vs MS: Fundamental Ratings
MC
MS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7185
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
597
SMR RATING
1..100
237
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5044
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6139
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MC's Valuation (10) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for MS (88). This means that MC’s stock grew significantly faster than MS’s over the last 12 months.

MS's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MC (59). This means that MS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MC’s over the last 12 months.

MS's SMR Rating (7) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MC (23). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.

MS's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MC (50). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.

MS's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MC (61). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCMS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DGRW99.25-0.04
-0.04%
WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Gr ETF
KAPR40.27-0.06
-0.16%
Innovator Russell 2000 Pwr Bffr ETF Apr
FEM32.58-0.30
-0.92%
First Trust Emerging Mrkts AlphaDEX® ETF
KTEC12.84-0.32
-2.43%
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH ETF
PLU8.55-0.50
-5.52%
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long PL ETF

MC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MC has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MC jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MC
1D Price
Change %
MC100%
+0.31%
EVR - MC
84%
Closely correlated
-0.61%
PJT - MC
80%
Closely correlated
+0.83%
HLI - MC
77%
Closely correlated
-0.08%
RJF - MC
76%
Closely correlated
+0.84%
LAZ - MC
74%
Closely correlated
-0.18%
More

MS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MS has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MS jumps, then GS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MS
1D Price
Change %
MS100%
-0.06%
GS - MS
85%
Closely correlated
-0.29%
RJF - MS
82%
Closely correlated
+0.84%
NDAQ - MS
71%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
EVR - MS
68%
Closely correlated
-0.61%
IBKR - MS
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
More