ACGL | AIG | EQH | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 75 | 78 | 85 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | 33 Fair valued | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 27 | 34 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 97 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 56 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 49 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 85 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EQH's Valuation (13) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as AIG (33) in the Multi Line Insurance industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for ACGL (61) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that EQH's stock grew similarly to AIG’s and somewhat faster than ACGL’s over the last 12 months.
ACGL's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as AIG (27) in the Multi Line Insurance industry, and is in the same range as EQH (34) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that ACGL's stock grew similarly to AIG’s and similarly to EQH’s over the last 12 months.
ACGL's SMR Rating (89) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as AIG (97) in the Multi Line Insurance industry, and is in the same range as EQH (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that ACGL's stock grew similarly to AIG’s and similarly to EQH’s over the last 12 months.
EQH's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as AIG (56) in the Multi Line Insurance industry, and is in the same range as ACGL (57) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that EQH's stock grew similarly to AIG’s and similarly to ACGL’s over the last 12 months.
EQH's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AIG (49) in the Multi Line Insurance industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for ACGL (64) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that EQH's stock grew somewhat faster than AIG’s and somewhat faster than ACGL’s over the last 12 months.
| ACGL | AIG | EQH | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A | 1 day ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 48% | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 41% | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 15 days ago 59% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 44% | 10 days ago 50% | 8 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 36% | 1 day ago 39% | 1 day ago 61% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACGL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while AIG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and EQH’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACGL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while AIG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and EQH’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ACGL (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а -0.32% price change this week, while AIG (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was -0.21% , and EQH (@Investment Managers) price fluctuated +4.43% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.29%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.63%.
ACGL is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
AIG is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
EQH is expected to report earnings on Nov 02, 2026.
A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.
@Investment Managers (-0.97% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACGL has been closely correlated with ORI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ACGL jumps, then ORI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACGL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACGL | 100% | +0.49% | ||
| ORI - ACGL | 73% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| PLGO - ACGL | 45% Loosely correlated | -3.10% | ||
| IGIC - ACGL | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| GSHD - ACGL | 37% Loosely correlated | -6.06% | ||
| EQH - ACGL | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.93% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQH has been closely correlated with CRBG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EQH jumps, then CRBG could also see price increases.