Automatic Data Processing, Manhattan Associates, and Paycom Software all sell enterprise software, yet they serve meaningfully different markets and face different competitive dynamics. This stock comparison is relevant for investors and traders weighing stability against growth, because the three names span the full spectrum from mature payroll leader to fast-growing cloud specialist. Understanding their relative performance, business models, and catalysts helps clarify which type of portfolio each may suit. The following sections examine recent financial results, market positioning, and the signals that may shape sentiment in the months ahead.
ADP (Automatic Data Processing) is one of the world's largest providers of human capital management (HCM) and payroll services, processing roughly one in six U.S. paychecks. Its scale and client-retention model give it a defensive quality rarely found among software peers. In recent quarters, revenue has grown at a mid-single-digit pace, supported by new business bookings and demand for platforms such as Workforce Now and Lyric HCM. Management has guided to roughly 5% to 6% revenue growth and 8% to 10% adjusted diluted earnings per share growth for the current fiscal year.
Recent market activity has been relatively subdued, with shares lagging the broader S&P 500 in recent weeks despite generally in-line or slightly better-than-expected results. Sentiment has been shaped by stable margins, ongoing interest income on client funds, and modestly softer employer-services retention tied to small-business dynamics. ADP also reached a notable milestone as a "Dividend King," having increased its dividend for 50 consecutive years, reinforcing its appeal to income-oriented and lower-volatility investors.
MANH (Manhattan Associates) develops supply chain and omnichannel commerce software used across retail, grocery, life sciences, and other verticals. The company's strategic focus is a transition toward cloud-based subscriptions and AI-powered capabilities. Recent results show the payoff of that pivot: cloud subscription revenue has climbed roughly 20% year over year, and remaining performance obligations (RPO) — a measure of contracted future revenue — expanded around 25%. The company carries no debt and ended its most recent period with a healthy cash position.
Performance has been characterized by accelerating cloud momentum and a rebound in services, offset by ongoing attrition in legacy license and maintenance revenue. Management's outlook anticipates double-digit total revenue growth excluding that attrition, alongside the commercial rollout of AI agents. Shares have modestly outperformed the market in recent weeks, though analyst estimate revisions have been mixed, reflecting some caution about near-term margin investment and a turbulent macroeconomic environment for global trade.
PAYC (Paycom Software) provides cloud-based HCM software known for its "Beti" employee-driven payroll technology and "IWant" AI assistant. The company operates a single-database architecture and emphasizes full-solution automation. In recent quarters, revenue has grown at a low-double-digit pace — the fastest among the three — and adjusted EBITDA margins have remained strong, near 43%. Revenue retention improved to about 91%, and the company reported a record number of clients returning to its platform.
Despite solid execution, recent market activity has been negative. Forward revenue guidance came in below consensus, and shares sold off sharply in response as investors weighed a more measured growth trajectory against continued investment in sales capacity. Operating margin also declined slightly year over year. This creates a contrast between Paycom's attractive product economics and the market's concern that its growth rate is normalizing faster than anticipated.
For traders seeking a systematic, data-driven perspective on names like these, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated view of its AI trading bots. Tickeron operates hundreds of AI Trading Bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, each with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance record, and set of monitored symbols. Because market conditions change constantly, only the bots best suited to the current environment are featured in this trending section, helping users cut through the noise. Traders can explore performance statistics, win-rate data, and strategy details to identify approaches that align with their objectives. To see which robots are currently leading the rankings, visit the Trending AI Robots page.
These three stocks differ most sharply in business model, growth profile, and risk. ADP is a scale-driven, margin-stable incumbent whose earnings are cushioned by interest income on client funds and a massive recurring client base — a profile that tends to hold up well in downturns but offers limited upside. MANH sits in the middle: smaller and more volatile than ADP, yet benefiting from a clear cloud-migration catalyst and a debt-free balance sheet, while still exposed to retail and logistics spending cycles. PAYC offers the highest growth and strongest automation narrative, but carries the greatest valuation sensitivity and near-term execution risk, as evidenced by its guidance-driven sell-off.
From a momentum perspective, MANH's cloud acceleration and PAYC's revenue growth stand out, while ADP has been the laggard in relative performance. On stability and trend consistency, the order reverses: ADP's defensive earnings stream is the most predictable, followed by MANH, with PAYC most exposed to sentiment swings. Sector exposure also differs — ADP and PAYC compete directly in HCM, while MANH operates in supply chain execution, making MANH a diversification play within any software comparison.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, stability, catalysts, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely favor ADP among the three in the current environment. Its combination of predictable revenue, resilient margins, and a 50-year dividend-growth record suggests a steadier, more consistent trend profile that quantitative models tend to reward during periods of macroeconomic uncertainty. That said, MANH presents a compelling secondary case given its accelerating cloud subscriptions and expanding RPO, while PAYC offers higher potential return but with a less stable near-term trend. The verdict is probabilistic rather than definitive, and any AI-driven assessment should be treated as one input among many.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
ADP | MANH | PAYC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | 91 Overvalued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 84 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 17 | 14 | 25 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 38 | 7 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 38 | 59 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 39 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ADP's Valuation (11) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as PAYC (17) in the Packaged Software industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for MANH (91) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that ADP's stock grew similarly to PAYC’s and significantly faster than MANH’s over the last 12 months.
ADP's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as MANH (84) in the Packaged Software industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for PAYC (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that ADP's stock grew similarly to MANH’s and somewhat faster than PAYC’s over the last 12 months.
MANH's SMR Rating (14) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ADP (17) in the Data Processing Services industry, and is in the same range as PAYC (25) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that MANH's stock grew similarly to ADP’s and similarly to PAYC’s over the last 12 months.
PAYC's Price Growth Rating (7) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as MANH (38) in the Packaged Software industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for ADP (41) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that PAYC's stock grew similarly to MANH’s and somewhat faster than ADP’s over the last 12 months.
MANH's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as PAYC (59) in the Packaged Software industry, and is in the same range as ADP (62) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that MANH's stock grew similarly to PAYC’s and similarly to ADP’s over the last 12 months.
| ADP | MANH | PAYC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 5 days ago 50% | 5 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 42% | N/A | 3 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | N/A | 3 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 47% | 5 days ago 68% | 12 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | N/A | 3 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 72% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ADP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while MANH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and PAYC’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ADP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MANH’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s), and PAYC’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
ADP (@Packaged Software) experienced а +5.12% price change this week, while MANH (@Packaged Software) price change was +0.36% , and PAYC (@Packaged Software) price fluctuated +5.08% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.75%.
ADP is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
MANH is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
PAYC is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ADP has been closely correlated with PAYX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ADP jumps, then PAYX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ADP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADP | 100% | +0.06% | ||
| PAYX - ADP | 86% Closely correlated | -0.46% | ||
| PCTY - ADP | 77% Closely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| PAYC - ADP | 67% Closely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| MANH - ADP | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| SSNC - ADP | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.47% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MANH has been closely correlated with WDAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MANH jumps, then WDAY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MANH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MANH | 100% | -0.91% | ||
| WDAY - MANH | 67% Closely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| PCTY - MANH | 67% Closely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| BLKB - MANH | 67% Closely correlated | +1.43% | ||
| FRSH - MANH | 66% Loosely correlated | +2.05% | ||
| DOCU - MANH | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAYC has been closely correlated with PAYX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAYC jumps, then PAYX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAYC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAYC | 100% | +1.01% | ||
| PAYX - PAYC | 68% Closely correlated | -0.46% | ||
| GEN - PAYC | 67% Closely correlated | +2.20% | ||
| ADP - PAYC | 67% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| WDAY - PAYC | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| CLSK - PAYC | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.27% | ||
More | ||||