Advertisement
AFL or MET or UNM
AFL | MET | UNM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 14 | 33 | 85 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | 40 Fair valued | 48 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 22 | 2 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 99 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 25 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 16 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MET's Valuation (40) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as UNM (48) and is in the same range as AFL (63). This means that MET's stock grew similarly to UNM’s and similarly to AFL’s over the last 12 months.
UNM's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as AFL (5) and is in the same range as MET (22). This means that UNM's stock grew similarly to AFL’s and similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.
AFL's SMR Rating (94) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as UNM (95) and is in the same range as MET (99). This means that AFL's stock grew similarly to UNM’s and similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.
MET's Price Growth Rating (25) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as UNM (44) and is in the same range as AFL (52). This means that MET's stock grew similarly to UNM’s and similarly to AFL’s over the last 12 months.
UNM's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (16) and is significantly better than the same rating for AFL (92). This means that UNM's stock grew similarly to MET’s and significantly faster than AFL’s over the last 12 months.
| AFL | MET | UNM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | N/A | 7 days ago 47% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 44% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 39% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 54% | 8 days ago 65% | 7 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 38% | 14 days ago 52% | 5 days ago 41% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 31% | 1 day ago 41% | 1 day ago 33% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AFL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while MET’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and UNM’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
- AFL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MET’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- UNM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AFL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MET’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and UNM’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AFL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- MET’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- UNM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AFL (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +3.12% price change this week, while MET (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +3.40% , and UNM (@Life/Health Insurance) price fluctuated +2.87% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -1.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.16%.
Reported Earning Dates
AFL is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
MET is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
UNM is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Life/Health Insurance (-1.94% weekly)Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.
Advertisement
AFL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFL has been loosely correlated with CNO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AFL jumps, then CNO could also see price increases.
MET and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MET has been closely correlated with PRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MET jumps, then PRU could also see price increases.
UNM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNM has been loosely correlated with CNO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UNM jumps, then CNO could also see price increases.