Albemarle Corporation (ALB), Olin Corporation (OLN), and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) operate in the basic materials and chemicals sectors, with significant exposure to lithium and specialty chemicals amid a rebound in commodity prices. This comparison analyzes their recent market performance, financial metrics, and sector drivers, relevant for investors tracking EV supply chains, industrial chemicals, and cyclical materials plays. Traders seeking relative strength in a volatile environment or long-term positioning in green energy materials will find insights into momentum, valuation, and risks.
Albemarle Corporation (ALB) is a global leader in lithium production for EV batteries and energy storage, alongside bromine and catalysts. In recent weeks, its stock has traded around $194, reflecting a 10.45% one-month gain and 37% YTD advance, driven by lithium price recovery and capacity expansions. Sentiment has improved with analysts projecting strong earnings growth ahead, including a 789% year-over-year EPS increase for the upcoming report, amid EV demand acceleration. However, trailing losses and high beta of 1.37 highlight volatility tied to commodity cycles.
Olin Corporation (OLN) produces chlor-alkali chemicals, vinyls, epoxy, and Winchester ammunition, serving industrial and defense markets. Recent market activity shows shares near $29, with a robust 38% YTD rise despite quarterly revenue dips and swings to losses from customer destocking. Relative strength ratings have jumped, supported by buybacks and a 2.8% dividend yield, though high debt levels and negative profit margins reflect cyclical pressures in chemicals. Trading volume remains active, signaling sustained investor interest.
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) specializes in lithium, iodine, potassium, and fertilizers from its Chilean operations. Shares hover around $93, up 34% YTD, bolstered by record lithium volumes, profitability, and 23% quarterly revenue growth. Recent lithium price rallies and positive analyst upgrades have lifted sentiment, with lower beta at 0.98 offering relative stability. Strong balance sheet with ample cash supports dividends and expansions in a recovering market.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI trading bots out of 351 available on the platform, curated for current market conditions. These bots employ diverse strategies across stocks, ETFs, and crypto, with performance stats including annualized returns from 23% to 163%, win rates of 51% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.7. Timeframes range from 60 minutes to 49 days, featuring high-frequency signals, risk-managed exits, and sector-specific plays like semiconductors and energy. Traders can copy these bots for automated execution, selecting by metrics such as profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 17. Explore the page to identify bots aligning with your risk profile and market outlook.
ALB and SQM center on lithium mining and processing, capitalizing on EV and battery growth, while OLN diversifies into commodity chemicals and ammunition, reducing single-commodity risk but exposing to industrial slowdowns. Recent momentum favors all amid materials rally, with OLN's smaller market cap enabling sharper YTD gains. Risks include lithium oversupply for ALB and SQM, versus OLN's high leverage. Valuation sensitivity shows SQM's superior margins and PEG ratio (price/earnings-to-growth), while market sentiment tilts toward lithium purity over OLN's broader exposure.
Tickeron’s AI models would likely favor ALB in the current environment, given its consistent upward trend, 10%+ monthly gains, capacity expansions, and positive earnings revisions amid lithium rebound. While SQM offers stability and profitability, and OLN high yield, ALB's relative momentum and catalysts position it probabilistically stronger for near-term outperformance.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ALB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOLN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and SQM’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ALB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OLN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and SQM’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
ALB (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +10.12% price change this week, while OLN (@Chemicals: Major Diversified) price change was -0.94% , and SQM (@Chemicals: Specialty) price fluctuated +5.27% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.79%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Major Diversified industry was -1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.92%.
ALB is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
OLN is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
SQM is expected to report earnings on May 27, 2026.
The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
@Chemicals: Major Diversified (-1.43% weekly)The major diversified chemicals industry includes companies that produce a wide range of chemicals and industrial gases. The products are often used as raw materials in the manufacturing of various types of goods, including plastics, paints, carpets, and fixtures to name a few. Major companies making diversified chemicals include DuPont de Nemours Inc., Celanese Corporation, Celanese Corporation and Westlake Chemical Corporation.
| ALB | OLN | SQM | |
| Capitalization | 24.8B | 3.24B | 26.7B |
| EBITDA | 568M | 408M | 1.15B |
| Gain YTD | 48.834 | 37.520 | 37.328 |
| P/E Ratio | 33.94 | 48.57 | 45.37 |
| Revenue | 5.5B | 6.72B | 4.58B |
| Total Cash | 1.09B | 192M | 1.17B |
| Total Debt | 1.88B | 3.31B | 4.73B |
ALB | OLN | SQM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 20 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | 42 Fair valued | 60 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 82 | 100 | 59 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 93 | 67 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 47 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 11 | 5 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 8 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OLN's Valuation (42) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as SQM (60) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for ALB (80) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that OLN's stock grew similarly to SQM’s and somewhat faster than ALB’s over the last 12 months.
SQM's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as ALB (82) in the Chemicals Specialty industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for OLN (100) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that SQM's stock grew similarly to ALB’s and somewhat faster than OLN’s over the last 12 months.
SQM's SMR Rating (67) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as ALB (92) in the Chemicals Specialty industry, and is in the same range as OLN (93) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that SQM's stock grew similarly to ALB’s and similarly to OLN’s over the last 12 months.
ALB's Price Growth Rating (4) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SQM (37) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for OLN (47) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that ALB's stock grew somewhat faster than SQM’s and somewhat faster than OLN’s over the last 12 months.
ALB's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as SQM (5) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry, and is in the same range as OLN (11) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that ALB's stock grew similarly to SQM’s and similarly to OLN’s over the last 12 months.
| ALB | OLN | SQM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | N/A | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 78% | 20 days ago 73% | 20 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 70% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QBNAX | 37.12 | N/A | N/A |
| Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Instl | |||
| CSURX | 26.95 | N/A | N/A |
| Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure R | |||
| SIDRX | 15.56 | N/A | N/A |
| Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val SDR | |||
| LGCVX | 21.65 | N/A | N/A |
| Lord Abbett Global Equity R5 | |||
| BBGLX | 26.88 | -0.09 | -0.33% |
| Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OLN has been closely correlated with DOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OLN jumps, then DOW could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SQM has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SQM jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SQM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SQM | 100% | +2.22% | ||
| ALB - SQM | 81% Closely correlated | +3.18% | ||
| OLN - SQM | 54% Loosely correlated | +5.89% | ||
| HUN - SQM | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| SXYAY - SQM | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.85% | ||
| MEOH - SQM | 46% Loosely correlated | +5.23% | ||
More | ||||