AME, IR, and NPO represent established players in the industrial machinery and equipment space, each with distinct business models tied to global manufacturing and infrastructure demand. This comparison appeals to traders monitoring sector rotation and investors seeking diversified exposure within industrials. The analysis examines recent price behavior, operational context, and positioning amid evolving market conditions, providing a factual basis for evaluating relative strengths without forecasts.
AMETEK, Inc. (AME) specializes in electronic instruments and electromechanical devices for aerospace, medical, and industrial applications. In recent weeks, the stock exhibited resilience with trading near multi-week highs amid steady institutional interest. Key developments include anticipation surrounding the second-quarter 2026 earnings release scheduled for early August, which analysts expect to highlight organic growth and margin trends. Broader market activity influenced sentiment as investors assessed capital goods demand, resulting in measured volatility rather than sharp directional moves.
Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) provides mission-critical flow creation and industrial technologies, serving compressed air, vacuum, and fluid management markets. Recent market activity reflected alignment with industrial production data, with the shares experiencing moderate fluctuations tied to macroeconomic readings. Operational updates in recent weeks emphasized efficiency initiatives and aftermarket revenue stability. Sentiment remained balanced as participants weighed supply-chain normalization against potential softening in certain end markets.
Enpro Inc. (NPO) focuses on sealing technologies, advanced materials, and engineered products for energy, aerospace, and general industrial uses. Over recent weeks, the stock displayed notable strength relative to peers, supported by favorable order trends and dividend adjustments. Upcoming second-quarter results are anticipated to offer insights into segment performance. Market positioning benefited from sustained interest in specialty industrials, though broader sector rotation introduced periodic pullbacks in line with overall market sentiment.
Tickeron maintains a curated selection of AI trading bots on its Trending AI Robots page. The platform features hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers, yet only those demonstrating strong suitability for prevailing market conditions are highlighted in the trending section. Available bots span a wide range of performance metrics, including win rates often between 55% and 75%, varying drawdown levels, and diverse timeframes from intraday to multi-week strategies. Each bot employs unique trading styles, risk parameters, and ticker sets, allowing users to explore options aligned with specific objectives. Review the full selection to identify bots matching individual risk tolerances and market views.
AME emphasizes precision instrumentation with exposure to high-margin aerospace and medical segments, contrasting with IR’s broader flow and compression portfolio that benefits from recurring aftermarket revenue. NPO differentiates through advanced sealing solutions with notable energy-sector linkages. Recent momentum has favored names with stronger order visibility, while valuation sensitivity appears higher for growth-oriented industrials amid interest-rate considerations. Risk factors include cyclical demand fluctuations and input-cost pressures, with sector exposure tilting toward capital goods across all three. Market sentiment reflects measured positioning, with contrasts evident in earnings growth trajectories and balance-sheet flexibility.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in recent market activity, relative stability of order backlogs, and positioning ahead of earnings catalysts, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a modestly higher probabilistic preference to AME for its demonstrated resilience and sector tailwinds. IR and NPO present compelling alternatives depending on specific risk parameters and time horizons, with outcomes likely influenced by forthcoming quarterly disclosures and macroeconomic developments.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AME’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileIR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and NPO’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AME’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and NPO’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
AME (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а +4.94% price change this week, while IR (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +4.31% , and NPO (@Industrial Machinery) price fluctuated +6.07% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +4.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.32%.
AME is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
IR is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
NPO is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| AME | IR | NPO | |
| Capitalization | 58.2B | 33.7B | 7.05B |
| EBITDA | 2.36B | 2B | 198M |
| Gain YTD | 22.817 | 11.442 | 57.442 |
| P/E Ratio | 37.08 | 35.94 | 161.64 |
| Revenue | 7.6B | 7.94B | 1.17B |
| Total Cash | N/A | 1.17B | 79.2M |
| Total Debt | 2.18B | 4.83B | 618M |
AME | IR | NPO | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 39 | 33 | 25 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | 66 Overvalued | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 50 | 14 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 59 | 75 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 24 | 45 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 89 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 50 | 55 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IR's Valuation (66) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as AME (75) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry, and is in the same range as NPO (90) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that IR's stock grew similarly to AME’s and similarly to NPO’s over the last 12 months.
AME's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as NPO (14) in the Industrial Machinery industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for IR (50) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that AME's stock grew similarly to NPO’s and somewhat faster than IR’s over the last 12 months.
AME's SMR Rating (59) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as IR (75) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry, and is in the same range as NPO (89) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that AME's stock grew similarly to IR’s and similarly to NPO’s over the last 12 months.
AME's Price Growth Rating (24) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as NPO (42) in the Industrial Machinery industry, and is in the same range as IR (45) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that AME's stock grew similarly to NPO’s and similarly to IR’s over the last 12 months.
NPO's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as AME (28) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for IR (89) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that NPO's stock grew similarly to AME’s and significantly faster than IR’s over the last 12 months.
| AME | IR | NPO | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 26% | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 49% | 4 days ago 66% | 5 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 58% | 11 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 56% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AME has been closely correlated with ROP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AME jumps, then ROP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IR has been closely correlated with JCI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IR jumps, then JCI could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NPO has been closely correlated with LECO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NPO jumps, then LECO could also see price increases.