Advertisement
APO or ARES or KKR
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Apollo Global Management (APO) vs. Ares Management (ARES) vs. KKR & Co. (KKR) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Apollo Global Management (APO), Ares Management (ARES), and KKR & Co. (KKR) are leading alternative asset managers with strong exposure to private credit, equity, and infrastructure.
- Recent market activity shows all three reporting or preparing Q2 2026 results, with notable AUM (assets under management) growth and fundraising momentum amid broader sector volatility.
- KKR posted record Q2 earnings with robust fee-related earnings and asset sales, while ARES highlighted record fundraising of approximately $36 billion and 17% year-over-year AUM growth.
- APO approaches its August 4 earnings release with investor focus on fee-related performance and AUM levels exceeding $1 trillion from earlier in the year.
- Relative performance reflects sector headwinds, with year-to-date declines across the group offset by recent rebounds tied to earnings optimism and operational resilience.
- Valuation sensitivity to interest rates and deal activity remains a common factor, with contrasts in scale, product mix, and recent momentum shaping investor positioning.
Introduction
Apollo Global Management (APO), Ares Management (ARES), and KKR & Co. (KKR) represent prominent players in the alternative asset management sector. These firms manage substantial pools of capital across private equity, credit, infrastructure, and real assets, appealing to institutional and sophisticated retail investors seeking exposure beyond traditional equities. In the current market environment of evolving interest rates and transaction activity, a comparison highlights differences in scale, growth drivers, and resilience. Traders and long-term investors monitoring relative performance, fee income trends, and sector positioning may find this analysis relevant for portfolio allocation decisions.
APO Overview and Recent Performance
Apollo Global Management (APO) operates as a global alternative asset manager with significant scale in credit, private equity, and real assets. As of the end of the first quarter of 2026, assets under management (AUM) exceeded $1 trillion. Recent market activity shows the stock trading near $125.59 as of July 31, 2026, reflecting a 4.44% single-day gain amid optimism ahead of the scheduled August 4 Q2 2026 earnings release. Over the past month, the shares posted modest gains, though longer-term references indicate year-to-date pressure consistent with broader alternative asset peers. Key influences include anticipated fee-related earnings updates and ongoing capital deployment in private markets, supporting measured sentiment in recent weeks.
ARES Overview and Recent Performance
Ares Management (ARES) focuses on credit, private equity, and infrastructure strategies, serving institutional clients globally. The firm reported second-quarter 2026 results with record quarterly fundraising of approximately $36 billion, driving AUM to $671 billion (up 17% year-over-year) and fee-paying AUM to $410 billion. As of July 31, 2026, the stock closed near $128.09 following a 3.20% gain. Recent performance reflects a rebound after earlier year-to-date declines, supported by strong fundraising momentum despite mixed earnings metrics. Influences on sentiment include sustained demand for private credit products and platform expansion, contributing to operational stability in recent market activity.
KKR Overview and Recent Performance
KKR & Co. (KKR) manages diversified portfolios spanning private equity, credit, infrastructure, real estate, and insurance solutions. Second-quarter 2026 results featured record adjusted earnings per share of $1.63 (beating estimates) and revenue growth, bolstered by higher management fees (up 25.5% year-over-year) and strong asset sales. The stock traded near $101.43 as of July 31, 2026. Recent weeks have seen gains tied to earnings strength and a landmark infrastructure transaction, offsetting broader year-to-date declines observed across the peer group. Sentiment has been supported by fee-related earnings expansion and capital-raising activity in a competitive environment.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from a library of hundreds that cover thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating suitability for prevailing market conditions, consistent strategies, and robust statistics earn placement in this trending section. Available bots span varied trading styles, timeframes, risk parameters, and performance metrics, with many tracking equity, sector, or thematic opportunities. Users can review detailed backtested results, win rates, drawdowns, and ticker-specific applicability to identify options aligned with individual objectives. Explore the full curated list on the Trending AI Robots page for data-driven insights into automated trading approaches.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Apollo Global Management (APO), Ares Management (ARES), and KKR & Co. (KKR) share core business models centered on alternative asset management yet differ in scale and emphasis. APO stands out for its large AUM base exceeding $1 trillion and credit focus, while ARES highlights rapid AUM expansion through record fundraising. KKR demonstrates strength in diversified platforms and recent earnings beats driven by fee income and realizations. Recent momentum favors KKR and ARES on reported results, with APO positioned ahead of its update. Risk factors include sensitivity to interest-rate environments and transaction volumes across all three. Valuation multiples reflect growth expectations in private markets, with trade-offs between APO’s scale, ARES’s credit-centric growth, and KKR’s broad product suite influencing relative positioning amid sector sentiment.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as recent earnings consistency, AUM trajectory, and relative positioning within the alternative asset sector, Tickeron’s AI models indicate a probabilistic preference for KKR in the current environment. The firm’s record Q2 results, fee-related earnings growth, and successful asset realizations provide a foundation of demonstrated momentum. ARES follows closely due to standout fundraising metrics, while APO remains competitive pending its upcoming report. Outcomes depend on sustained market conditions and execution across the group.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileARES’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and KKR’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
- APO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ARES’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- KKR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ARES’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and KKR’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- APO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
- ARES’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- KKR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
APO (@Investment Managers) experienced а +6.84% price change this week, while ARES (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.85% , and KKR (@Investment Managers) price fluctuated +5.17% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.98%.
Reported Earning Dates
APO is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
ARES is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
KKR is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (+2.71% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| APO | ARES | KKR | |
| Capitalization | 81.9B | 32.1B | 99.5B |
| EBITDA | 7.72B | 2.23B | 9.74B |
| Gain YTD | -3.452 | -9.830 | -12.510 |
| P/E Ratio | 49.33 | 65.30 | 35.43 |
| Revenue | 31.5B | 5.91B | 21.1B |
| Total Cash | 253B | N/A | N/A |
| Total Debt | 14.2B | 14.1B | 54.6B |
APO | ARES | KKR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 31 | 84 | 39 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | 72 Overvalued | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 44 | 51 | 62 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 97 | 72 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 46 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | 89 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ARES's Valuation (72) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as APO (74) and is in the same range as KKR (82). This means that ARES's stock grew similarly to APO’s and similarly to KKR’s over the last 12 months.
APO's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as ARES (51) and is in the same range as KKR (62). This means that APO's stock grew similarly to ARES’s and similarly to KKR’s over the last 12 months.
KKR's SMR Rating (72) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as APO (92) and is in the same range as ARES (97). This means that KKR's stock grew similarly to APO’s and similarly to ARES’s over the last 12 months.
APO's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as ARES (46) and is in the same range as KKR (47). This means that APO's stock grew similarly to ARES’s and similarly to KKR’s over the last 12 months.
APO's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for ARES (89) and is significantly better than the same rating for KKR (93). This means that APO's stock grew significantly faster than ARES’s and significantly faster than KKR’s over the last 12 months.
| APO | ARES | KKR | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 7 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 69% | 7 days ago 66% | 7 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 59% |
Advertisement
APO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APO has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APO jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.
ARES and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARES has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ARES jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ARES | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARES | 100% | -0.53% | ||
| KKR - ARES | 83% Closely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| BX - ARES | 79% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| OWL - ARES | 78% Closely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| APO - ARES | 78% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| TPG - ARES | 77% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
More | ||||