Advertisement
AU or B or FNV
Which Stock Would AI Choose? AngloGold Ashanti (AU) vs. Barnes Group (B) vs. Franco-Nevada (FNV) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- AngloGold Ashanti (AU) is a diversified gold miner that posted record 2025 cash flow on higher production and a surging gold price, though rising costs and a slightly softer 2026 production outlook remain key watch points.
- Barnes Group (B) is an aerospace and industrial components maker whose shares have been anchored by a pending acquisition by an affiliate of Apollo Global Management at $52.00 per share in cash.
- Franco-Nevada (FNV) is a gold-focused royalty and streaming company with roughly 90% adjusted EBITDA margins and a debt-free balance sheet, offering leverage to gold without operating-cost exposure.
- The three names represent three distinct risk profiles: an operating miner, a deal-driven industrial, and an asset-light royalty business.
- Rising gold prices are a shared catalyst for AU and FNV, while B's relative performance is tied primarily to transaction certainty rather than commodity trends.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines three publicly traded companies with very different business models: AU, a global gold producer; B, a manufacturer of engineered aerospace and industrial products; and FNV, a precious-metals royalty and streaming company. Because each responds to different drivers—commodity prices, industrial demand, and capital-market activity—they rarely move in tandem. Traders and investors evaluating sector exposure, relative performance, and market positioning may find this comparison useful for understanding where momentum, stability, and risk currently concentrate across the three tickers.
AU Overview and Recent Performance
AU, or AngloGold Ashanti plc, operates gold mines across Africa, Australia, and the Americas. Recent market activity has been dominated by a powerful gold-price rally, which lifted the shares sharply over the past year and positioned AngloGold as one of the sector's stronger performers. The company reported record full-year 2025 results, including gold production of roughly 3.09 million ounces (up 16% year over year), gold revenue of about $9.73 billion (up 71.5%), and adjusted EBITDA of approximately $6.3 billion. Free cash flow reached a record near $2.9 billion, supported by the first full-year contribution from the Sukari mine in Egypt and improved output at Obuasi and other assets.
Cost pressures, however, remain a counterweight. Total cash costs rose to about $1,242 per ounce, and all-in sustaining costs (AISC)—a measure that adds sustaining capital and other expenses to cash costs—climbed to roughly $1,709 per ounce in 2025. Management's 2026 guidance points to production of 2.80 to 3.17 million ounces, a modest decline at the midpoint, alongside higher anticipated costs. The combination of record cash generation and rising expenses has made AU a high-beta, momentum-sensitive way to express a view on gold.
B Overview and Recent Performance
B, or Barnes Group Inc., is a provider of engineered products and industrial technologies operating through its Industrial and Aerospace segments. The Aerospace business serves original equipment manufacturers as well as aftermarket and maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) activity. In late 2025, Barnes Group announced a definitive agreement to be acquired by an affiliate of Apollo Global Management for $52.00 per share in cash, a transaction that has since been the primary driver of the stock's valuation and trading range.
As a result, B's recent price behavior has been less about aerospace demand cycles or industrial volumes and more about deal progression and closing certainty. Sell-side analysts have largely maintained Buy or Hold ratings with price targets clustered near the acquisition price, reflecting expectations that the transaction will complete. This dynamic produces a comparatively low-volatility profile: the share price tends to track the spread between the current market price and the agreed cash consideration, with any movement driven by regulatory or financing updates rather than fundamental operating news.
FNV Overview and Recent Performance
FNV, or Franco-Nevada Corporation, is a leading gold-focused royalty and streaming company. Rather than mining metals itself, Franco-Nevada provides upfront capital to operators in exchange for a share of future production or revenue, typically measured in gold equivalent ounces (GEOs)—a standardized unit that converts silver, platinum, and other metals into gold-equivalent terms. This asset-light structure delivers very high margins: adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) margin was approximately 91% in 2025, and the company ended the year debt-free.
Franco-Nevada reported record full-year 2025 results, including revenue of about $1.82 billion (up 64%), adjusted EBITDA of roughly $1.66 billion, and net income of about $1.11 billion. Recent developments include a partial resumption of stream deliveries tied to the Cobre Panamá mine and portfolio additions such as a net smelter return (NSR) royalty—a payment based on a percentage of the value of minerals processed—on the Arthur Gold Project in Nevada, an asset operated by AngloGold Ashanti. The primary catalysts ahead are the pace of the Cobre Panamá restart and continued contributions from recently acquired royalties.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots drawn from a much larger library. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across a wide range of styles, strategies, timeframes, performance metrics, and statistics. Because not every bot suits every market environment, only those considered the best and most suitable for current conditions earn a place in this curated section. Whether you are monitoring a gold producer, an acquisition target, or a royalty company, exploring the Trending AI Robots can help you identify signal-driven approaches aligned with the prevailing market regime.
Head-to-Head Comparison
At the business-model level, the three stocks diverge sharply. AU is an operating miner that carries full exposure to production costs, labor, energy, and geopolitical risk in exchange for direct leverage to the gold price. B is an industrial manufacturer whose near-term trajectory is dominated by a pending change of control, making it more sensitive to deal execution than to aerospace demand. FNV sits between the two: it captures gold-price upside through royalties and streams while avoiding most operating-cost inflation, at the cost of being dependent on third-party operators and carrying some asset-concentration risk.
On momentum, AU has been the strongest performer over the trailing year, propelled by record gold prices and rising production, though its gains also make it more vulnerable to profit-taking when the metal pulls back. FNV has delivered more measured appreciation with structurally higher margins and lower balance-sheet risk. B has shown the least fundamental momentum, with its price effectively capped near the acquisition consideration. Valuation sensitivity also differs: AU and FNV are sensitive to gold-price assumptions and central-bank demand, while B's valuation is governed primarily by the terms and probability of the Apollo transaction. Investors weighing sector exposure and relative performance must therefore choose between operating leverage, transactional certainty, and a high-margin royalty structure.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, margin stability, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely favor FNV in the current environment. Its royalty and streaming model combines sustained exposure to elevated gold prices with industry-leading margins, a debt-free balance sheet, and a diversified pipeline of catalysts, including the potential Cobre Panamá restart. AU offers stronger momentum but carries greater cost and operational volatility, while B's returns are largely constrained by an agreed transaction price. Consequently, the AI framework would most probably rank FNV as the more stable, higher-quality vehicle for precious-metals exposure, with AU as a higher-beta alternative and B as a low-volatility, event-driven position.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
AU sees MACD Histogram crosses below signal line
AU saw its Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) turn negative on October 22, 2026. This is a bearish signal that suggests the stock could decline going forward. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 51 instances where the indicator turned negative. In 39 of the 51 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a downward move at 76%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 22, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on AU as a result. In 61 of 81 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 75%.
AU moved below its 50-day moving average on September 28, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for AU crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 01, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 12 of 18 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 67%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where AU declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 75%.
The Aroon Indicator for AU entered a downward trend on October 22, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator entered the oversold zone -- be on the watch for AU's price rising or consolidating in the future. That's also the time to consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 47 of 59 cases where AU's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 80%.
Following a +4.48% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where AU advanced for three days, in 258 of 314 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.
AU may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 22 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 24 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 65, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 44 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. AU’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 64 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (4.810) is normal, around the industry mean (1.927). P/E Ratio (11.389) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-15.408). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.040) is also within normal values, averaging (2.614). Dividend Yield (0.034) settles around the average of (0.345) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (4.307) is also within normal values, averaging (7.321).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 76 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
Momentum Indicator for B turns negative, indicating new downward trend
B saw its Momentum Indicator move below the 0 level on October 22, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new downward move. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 67 similar instances where the indicator turned negative. In 48 of the 67 cases, the stock moved further down in the following days. The odds of a decline are at 72%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 32 of 55 cases where B's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 58%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for B turned negative on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 41 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 26 of the 41 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 63%.
B moved below its 50-day moving average on September 28, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for B crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 01, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 6 of 11 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 55%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where B declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 70%.
The Aroon Indicator for B entered a downward trend on October 22, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The 50-day moving average for B moved above the 200-day moving average on October 06, 2026. This could be a long-term bullish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an upward trend.
Following a +4.96% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where B advanced for three days, in 220 of 317 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
B may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 23 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 38 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 48 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. B’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 49 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 88 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.330) is normal, around the industry mean (1.927). P/E Ratio (9.987) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-15.408). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (2.230) is also within normal values, averaging (2.614). Dividend Yield (0.018) settles around the average of (0.345) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.465) is also within normal values, averaging (7.321).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. B’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 65, placing this stock worse than average.
FNV in upward trend: price may jump up because it broke its lower Bollinger Band on October 22, 2026
FNV may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 26 of 38 cases where FNV's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 68%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where FNV's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 13 of 24 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 54%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 40 of 59 cases where FNV's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 68%.
Following a +3.69% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FNV advanced for three days, in 207 of 330 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 63%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 22, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on FNV as a result. In 58 of 78 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 74%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for FNV turned negative on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 48 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 30 of the 48 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 62%.
FNV moved below its 50-day moving average on September 30, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for FNV crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 06, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 14 of 20 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 70%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FNV declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 62%.
The Aroon Indicator for FNV entered a downward trend on October 09, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 36 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 65, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 46 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 47 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. FNV’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 74 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (5.429) is normal, around the industry mean (1.927). P/E Ratio (30.240) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-15.408). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.190) is also within normal values, averaging (2.614). Dividend Yield (0.008) settles around the average of (0.345) among similar stocks. FNV's P/S Ratio (21.645) is slightly higher than the industry average of (7.321).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 79 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
AU | B | FNV | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 77 | 6 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 64 Fair valued | 88 Overvalued | 74 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 100 | 36 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 22 | 38 | 46 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 48 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 23 | 79 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 49 | 30 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AU's Valuation (64) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as FNV (74) in the Precious Metals industry, and is in the same range as B (88) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that AU's stock grew similarly to FNV’s and similarly to B’s over the last 12 months.
AU's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as FNV (36) in the Precious Metals industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for B (100) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that AU's stock grew similarly to FNV’s and significantly faster than B’s over the last 12 months.
AU's SMR Rating (22) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as B (38) in the Industrial Machinery industry, and is in the same range as FNV (46) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AU's stock grew similarly to B’s and similarly to FNV’s over the last 12 months.
AU's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as FNV (47) in the Precious Metals industry, and is in the same range as B (48) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that AU's stock grew similarly to FNV’s and similarly to B’s over the last 12 months.
B's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AU (76) in the Precious Metals industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for FNV (79) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that B's stock grew somewhat faster than AU’s and somewhat faster than FNV’s over the last 12 months.
| AU | B | FNV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | N/A | 2 days ago 54% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 82% | 8 days ago 69% | 8 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 66% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AU’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while B’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and FNV’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
- AU’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- B’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- FNV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AU’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while B’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and FNV’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- B’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
- FNV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
AU (@Precious Metals) experienced а -6.97% price change this week, while B (@Precious Metals) price change was -4.69% , and FNV (@Precious Metals) price fluctuated -3.71% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -7.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -18.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.51%.
Reported Earning Dates
AU is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
B is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.
FNV is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Precious Metals (-7.84% weekly)The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
Advertisement
B and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, B has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if B jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.
FNV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNV has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNV jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.