BAM
Price
$52.49
Change
-$0.68 (-1.28%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
83.39B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CG
Price
$47.79
Change
-$1.09 (-2.23%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
17.19B
93 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TPG
Price
$48.99
Change
+$0.48 (+0.99%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
7.86B
94 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAM or CG or TPG

BAM vs CG vs TPG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 03, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) vs. The Carlyle Group (CG) vs. TPG Inc. (TPG) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Brookfield Asset Management (BAM), The Carlyle Group (CG), and TPG Inc. (TPG) are leading alternative asset managers with diversified platforms spanning private equity, credit, real estate, and infrastructure.
  • Recent market activity shows these stocks reflecting broader sector dynamics, including fundraising momentum and sensitivity to interest rate expectations and economic growth indicators.
  • BAM has highlighted fee-related earnings (FRE) growth and substantial capital raises in recent quarters, supporting its positioning in infrastructure and renewables.
  • CG and TPG maintain large assets under management (AUM) bases, with ongoing focus on credit and private equity strategies amid evolving market conditions.
  • Relative performance has varied, influenced by each firm’s exposure to different asset classes and geographic footprints.
  • Valuation metrics across the trio remain tied to AUM expansion, fee income stability, and overall alternative asset demand.

Introduction

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM), The Carlyle Group (CG), and TPG Inc. (TPG) represent prominent players in the alternative asset management sector. This comparison examines their business models, recent performance trends, and market positioning to assist institutional investors, portfolio managers, and active traders evaluating exposure within the financial services space. The analysis draws on verifiable developments in fundraising, earnings metrics, and sector sentiment over recent weeks, providing context for relative strengths without forward-looking projections.

BAM Overview and Recent Performance

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) operates as a global alternative asset manager with significant emphasis on infrastructure, renewable energy, private equity, and real estate. The firm manages substantial assets under management (AUM) across multiple strategies. In recent market activity, BAM reported strong first-quarter results that included $21 billion in capital raises and an 11% year-over-year increase in fee-related earnings (FRE). Stock price behavior has reflected investor attention to these operational metrics alongside broader market movements in asset management shares. Sentiment has been shaped by the company’s capital deployment capabilities and share repurchase activity during periods of volatility.

CG Overview and Recent Performance

The Carlyle Group (CG) is a global investment firm with core segments in private equity, credit, and fund solutions. It oversees hundreds of billions in AUM and serves institutional and high-net-worth clients worldwide. Recent performance has aligned with sector peers, with share price fluctuations influenced by credit market conditions and private equity deal flow. Developments in recent weeks have centered on the firm’s diversified platform and ongoing investor commitments, contributing to steady positioning amid fluctuating equity markets.

TPG Overview and Recent Performance

TPG Inc. (TPG) functions as an alternative asset manager with platforms spanning private equity, growth equity, impact investing, real estate, and credit. The firm manages over $300 billion in AUM and maintains a global presence. Recent stock behavior has mirrored movements in the broader asset management group, supported by its multi-product strategy and focus on innovation-driven investments. Market sentiment in recent periods has responded to earnings releases and capital-raising updates, consistent with industry patterns.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions earn placement in this section. Available bots span diverse trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance statistics, and ticker sets, with many exhibiting win rates in the 60-80% range or higher depending on configuration and historical backtesting periods. Traders can explore detailed metrics on each bot to identify suitable options for their approach. Review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM), The Carlyle Group (CG), and TPG Inc. (TPG) share alternative asset management business models but differ in emphasis. BAM maintains notable exposure to infrastructure and renewables, while CG balances private equity with a large credit platform, and TPG incorporates growth equity and impact strategies alongside traditional private equity. Recent momentum has varied according to each firm’s AUM composition and fundraising cadence. Risk factors include sensitivity to interest rates, regulatory changes in private markets, and economic cycles affecting deal activity. Valuation metrics reflect AUM growth potential and fee stability, with market sentiment responsive to quarterly capital raises and earnings consistency across the group.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in recent market activity, stability of fee-related metrics, and relative positioning within the alternative asset sector, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic preference toward Brookfield Asset Management (BAM). This assessment rests on documented fundraising results and earnings trends without implying certainty or investment recommendations.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 09, 2026
Stock price -- (BAM: $52.49CG: $47.79TPG: $48.99)
Brand notoriety: BAM, CG and TPG are all not notable
The three companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 93%, CG: 74%, TPG: 141%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $83.39B, CG: $17.19B, TPG: $7.86B
$BAM is valued at $83.39B, while CG has a market capitalization of $17.19B, and TPG's market capitalization is $7.86B. The market cap for tickers in this @Investment Managers ranges from $175.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Investment Managers industry is $9.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and TPG’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TPG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the long-term than CG, which in turn is a better option than TPG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and TPG’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TPG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAM, CG and TPG are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а +8.45% price change this week, while CG (@Investment Managers) price change was +3.85% , and TPG (@Investment Managers) price fluctuated +12.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +5.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

CG is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.

TPG is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+5.92% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAM($83.4B) has a higher market cap than CG($17.2B) and TPG($7.86B). TPG has higher P/E ratio than CG and BAM: TPG (212.96) vs CG (49.78) and BAM (30.17). BAM YTD gains are higher at: 2.284 vs. CG (-18.030) and TPG (-22.002). TPG has less debt than BAM and CG: TPG (2.99B) vs BAM (3.83B) and CG (14.6B). BAM has higher revenues than TPG and CG: BAM (4.77B) vs TPG (3.04B) and CG (2.9B).
BAMCGTPG
Capitalization83.4B17.2B7.86B
EBITDA3.46BN/AN/A
Gain YTD2.284-18.030-22.002
P/E Ratio30.1749.78212.96
Revenue4.77B2.9B3.04B
Total Cash1.1BN/AN/A
Total Debt3.83B14.6B2.99B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM vs CG: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
CG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3833
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9184
SMR RATING
1..100
3270
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4758
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8215
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CG's Valuation (14) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (15) in the null industry. This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

CG's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (91) in the null industry. This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's SMR Rating (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CG (70) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than CG’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as CG (58) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

CG's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for BAM (82) in the null industry. This means that CG’s stock grew significantly faster than BAM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMCGTPG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TPG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VVOS0.32N/A
+0.62%
Vivos Therapeutics
FTH24.39-0.09
-0.37%
Faeth Therapeutics Inc
CVI31.15-0.22
-0.70%
CVR Energy
DD142.47-1.58
-1.10%
DuPont de Nemours
MMLP2.45-0.09
-3.73%
Martin Midstream Partners LP

BAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAM
1D Price
Change %
BAM100%
-1.28%
BN - BAM
85%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
KKR - BAM
74%
Closely correlated
-0.52%
ARES - BAM
71%
Closely correlated
-0.96%
BX - BAM
71%
Closely correlated
+2.76%
CG - BAM
70%
Closely correlated
-2.23%
More

CG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CG has been closely correlated with TPG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CG jumps, then TPG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CG
1D Price
Change %
CG100%
-2.23%
TPG - CG
79%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
KKR - CG
77%
Closely correlated
-0.52%
BX - CG
75%
Closely correlated
+2.76%
BN - CG
74%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
APO - CG
70%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
More

TPG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TPG has been closely correlated with CG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TPG jumps, then CG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TPG
1D Price
Change %
TPG100%
+1.25%
CG - TPG
80%
Closely correlated
-1.93%
KKR - TPG
78%
Closely correlated
-2.18%
ARES - TPG
77%
Closely correlated
-1.14%
BX - TPG
74%
Closely correlated
-1.90%
OWL - TPG
73%
Closely correlated
-0.78%
More