Integrated oil and gas companies BP, EQNR, and SU operate across upstream exploration, production, refining, and marketing segments. These stocks are frequently compared by investors seeking exposure to the energy sector, where commodity price movements, geopolitical developments, and capital allocation strategies drive relative performance. Traders and portfolio managers focused on sector rotation, dividend income, or hedging against inflation may find this comparison relevant for assessing diversification within energy holdings and evaluating how each company navigates fluctuating oil and gas markets.
BP p.l.c. is a global integrated energy company engaged in oil and gas exploration, production, refining, and marketing, with growing interests in lower-carbon solutions. In recent market activity, shares have benefited from higher oil and gas prices driven by supply concerns in the Middle East. The company expects its second-quarter 2026 results, scheduled for release on August 4, to reflect stronger trading results and improved refining margins, partially offset by planned upstream output declines. Year-to-date performance has been positive, supported by the broader energy price rally, though the stock remains sensitive to benchmark crude movements and upcoming earnings details.
Equinor ASA is a Norwegian integrated energy company with significant operations in oil and gas production, particularly as a leading supplier of natural gas to Europe, alongside refining and marketing activities. Recent performance has been bolstered by elevated commodity prices, with the company reporting second-quarter 2026 adjusted operating income of USD 11.48 billion and net income of USD 4.84 billion. These results highlight the impact of stronger oil and gas realizations. The stock has delivered robust one-year returns, aided by dividend distributions and operational stability in its core upstream assets amid ongoing market volatility.
Suncor Energy Inc. is a Canadian integrated energy company focused on oil sands production, refining, and marketing, with a significant presence in North American energy markets. In recent weeks, the stock has shown strength ahead of its second-quarter 2026 earnings release on August 4, where analysts project substantial year-over-year EPS growth. The company has met key net debt targets, enabling increased share repurchases, and maintains a focus on operational reliability. Performance has been supported by higher realized prices for its production, contributing to year-to-date gains and positioning the company favorably within the sector.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to navigate dynamic market conditions. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers, yet only the strongest performers suited to prevailing environments earn placement in this section. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics, including varying win rates, profit factors, and drawdown profiles. This diversity allows users to identify tools aligned with specific risk tolerances and market views. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed metrics and live strategies.
BP maintains a broad global footprint with notable refining exposure, which can amplify gains during periods of strong crack spreads but also introduces margin volatility. EQNR benefits from a concentrated European natural gas position and lower breakeven costs on key projects, offering relative resilience in price swings compared with peers more exposed to heavier crudes. SU stands out for its oil sands focus and recent progress on debt reduction, which has unlocked higher capital returns through buybacks, though it carries regional concentration risk in Canada. Valuation sensitivity across the group remains tied to oil price assumptions, with EQNR and SU demonstrating stronger recent earnings momentum and capital return programs. Market sentiment has been broadly supportive for all three amid the energy rally, yet trade-offs emerge in geographic exposure, dividend sustainability, and growth project pipelines.
Based on observable factors such as recent earnings delivery, trend consistency in commodity price benefits, and capital return frameworks, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic edge to EQNR due to its strong second-quarter results and established dividend momentum. SU follows closely with anticipated earnings expansion and buyback acceleration, while BP offers balanced exposure tempered by upcoming output guidance. This assessment reflects relative positioning rather than definitive outcomes and remains subject to evolving market conditions.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileEQNR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and SU’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EQNR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and SU’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
BP (@Integrated Oil) experienced а -7.94% price change this week, while EQNR (@Integrated Oil) price change was -5.30% , and SU (@Integrated Oil) price fluctuated -10.67% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was -5.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.81%.
BP is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
EQNR is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
SU is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.
| BP | EQNR | SU | |
| Capitalization | 108B | 92.6B | 70B |
| EBITDA | 35B | 46.2B | 16.2B |
| Gain YTD | 22.811 | 68.611 | 35.482 |
| P/E Ratio | 19.89 | 10.55 | 11.24 |
| Revenue | 195B | 114B | 54.5B |
| Total Cash | 35.8B | 23.7B | 3.27B |
| Total Debt | 74.2B | 32.4B | 14.8B |
BP | EQNR | SU | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 61 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 23 Undervalued | 36 Fair valued | 28 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 23 | 20 | 18 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 84 | 45 | 60 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 39 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 26 | 58 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 47 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BP's Valuation (23) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as SU (28) and is in the same range as EQNR (36). This means that BP's stock grew similarly to SU’s and similarly to EQNR’s over the last 12 months.
SU's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as EQNR (20) and is in the same range as BP (23). This means that SU's stock grew similarly to EQNR’s and similarly to BP’s over the last 12 months.
EQNR's SMR Rating (45) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as SU (60) and is somewhat better than the same rating for BP (84). This means that EQNR's stock grew similarly to SU’s and somewhat faster than BP’s over the last 12 months.
EQNR's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as SU (48) and is in the same range as BP (48). This means that EQNR's stock grew similarly to SU’s and similarly to BP’s over the last 12 months.
EQNR's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as SU (58) and is significantly better than the same rating for BP (100). This means that EQNR's stock grew similarly to SU’s and significantly faster than BP’s over the last 12 months.
| BP | EQNR | SU | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 59% | 18 days ago 69% | 10 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 52% | 5 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 72% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQNR has been closely correlated with BP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EQNR jumps, then BP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EQNR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EQNR | 100% | -1.37% | ||
| BP - EQNR | 75% Closely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| XOM - EQNR | 71% Closely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| SU - EQNR | 71% Closely correlated | -2.04% | ||
| SHEL - EQNR | 70% Closely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| CVE - EQNR | 70% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||