Advertisement
CAL or DECK or KTB
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Caleres, Inc. (CAL) vs. Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) vs. Kontoor Brands, Inc. (KTB) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Caleres, Inc. (CAL) operates primarily in the footwear retail and wholesale space with a focus on value-oriented and branded products, showing recent price pressure amid consumer discretionary softness.
- Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) benefits from strong brand portfolios including UGG and HOKA, demonstrating relative resilience in premium segments during recent market activity.
- Kontoor Brands, Inc. (KTB) delivers apparel through iconic denim and outdoor brands such as Wrangler and Lee, with recent quarterly results highlighting revenue growth alongside mixed earnings outcomes.
- Market positioning differs notably: DECK holds the largest market capitalization and broadest international exposure, while CAL remains the smallest by enterprise value.
- Recent performance trends reflect sector-wide sensitivity to consumer spending patterns, with DECK exhibiting more stable momentum compared to the other two in the past several weeks.
- Valuation metrics and dividend yields vary, offering distinct risk-reward profiles for investors focused on apparel and footwear equities.
Introduction
Investors and traders evaluating opportunities within the consumer discretionary sector often compare companies with overlapping yet differentiated exposures to footwear and apparel. Caleres, Inc. (CAL), Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK), and Kontoor Brands, Inc. (KTB) represent three distinct approaches to branded products, retail channels, and global supply chains. This comparison highlights how differences in business models, scale, and recent market behavior influence relative performance. Portfolio managers seeking diversification across value, growth, and income characteristics, as well as active traders monitoring sector rotations, may find the analysis relevant for assessing positioning in the current environment.
CAL Overview and Recent Performance
Caleres, Inc. designs, sources, and distributes footwear through its Famous Footwear retail network and a portfolio of owned brands including Naturalizer and Dr. Scholl’s. The company serves both domestic and international markets with a mix of casual, athletic, and dress styles. In recent weeks, CAL shares have experienced downward pressure aligned with broader challenges in value-oriented retail amid fluctuating consumer confidence. Key influences on sentiment include ongoing inventory management efforts and competition from direct-to-consumer channels. Market participants have noted modest volume levels and sensitivity to macroeconomic data releases affecting discretionary spending.
DECK Overview and Recent Performance
Deckers Outdoor Corporation markets performance and lifestyle footwear and apparel under prominent brands such as HOKA and UGG. Operations span wholesale, direct-to-consumer, and international markets with an emphasis on innovation and brand marketing. During recent market activity, DECK has demonstrated comparatively steadier price behavior supported by consistent brand momentum and analyst commentary on growth potential in premium segments. Factors shaping performance include strong demand for lifestyle products and measured responses to seasonal inventory cycles. The stock’s larger capitalization has contributed to relatively lower volatility compared with smaller peers in the same industry group.
KTB Overview and Recent Performance
Kontoor Brands, Inc. focuses on denim, workwear, and outdoor apparel primarily through the Wrangler and Lee brands, supplemented by Helly Hansen. The company generates revenue via wholesale, retail, and licensing channels across multiple regions. In recent weeks, KTB has shown price movement influenced by its first-quarter earnings release, which featured revenue expansion offset by earnings-per-share results that varied from consensus estimates. Sentiment has reflected both the positive revenue trajectory and ongoing considerations around tariff exposure and guidance updates. Overall positioning remains tied to cyclical apparel demand and operational efficiency initiatives.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron maintains a curated Trending AI Robots page that showcases select AI-powered trading systems from its extensive library of hundreds of bots. These systems analyze thousands of tickers daily, yet only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions, consistent historical statistics, and suitable risk parameters appear in the trending section. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, timeframes, and performance metrics, with many reporting win rates between 55% and 75% alongside varying profit factors and drawdown profiles depending on strategy and ticker universe. This selection process highlights bots with robust recent activity across equities including those in the consumer sector. For additional details on current trending options, visit Trending AI Robots.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Business models diverge significantly: CAL emphasizes retail footprint and value footwear, DECK prioritizes premium lifestyle and performance branding, and KTB centers on denim and workwear with licensing revenue. Growth drivers include DECK’s marketing investments versus KTB’s focus on international expansion and CAL’s store optimization. Recent momentum has favored DECK’s stability, while KTB and CAL have displayed greater sensitivity to quarterly results and sector headwinds. Risk factors encompass supply-chain costs for all three, with DECK carrying higher valuation multiples and CAL facing narrower margins. Sector exposure remains concentrated in consumer cyclicals, where sentiment shifts tied to economic indicators can amplify relative performance differences.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, earnings stability, and relative market positioning in recent activity, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a higher probability of favorable near-term behavior to DECK. The company’s established brand strength and broader scale appear to support more resilient momentum compared with the smaller capitalization and higher volatility profiles of CAL and KTB. This assessment remains probabilistic and subject to evolving market data.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CAL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDECK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and KTB’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
- CAL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- DECK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- KTB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CAL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DECK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and KTB’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CAL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
- DECK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- KTB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CAL (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) experienced а -15.04% price change this week, while DECK (@Wholesale Distributors) price change was -5.02% , and KTB (@Apparel/Footwear) price fluctuated -2.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear Retail industry was +0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.42%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wholesale Distributors industry was -4.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.73%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was -3.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.49%.
Reported Earning Dates
CAL is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.
DECK is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
KTB is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Apparel/Footwear Retail (+0.56% weekly)Companies in the apparel and/or footwear retail industry sell clothing, accessories and footwear, for different age groups and genders. The industry’s product categories could range from basics, such as underwear, to luxury items. Some retailers source items from wholesalers or an apparel brand to sell in their stores; some others are licensed to make and market their own retail goods under particular brands. Several companies outsource production of clothing to developing/emerging economies where labor costs are relatively inexpensive. Apparel retail is often influenced by fashion trends, and many companies feel the need to adapt to what’s “in vogue” to retain customers and attract new ones. A major disruption in this industry has been the burgeoning trend in digital shopping – to compete with rapidly growing e-commerce, even traditional retail players are upping the ante on their online platforms. Much of the products’ performance in apparel/footwear retail is cyclical, i.e., economic boom times encourage consumer spending, while recessions induce thriftiness among people. Some large-cap U.S. apparel/footwear retail companies include TJX Companies Inc., Ross Stores, Inc., Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Burlington Stores, Inc.
@Wholesale Distributors (-4.21% weekly)Companies in this industry handle the wholesale shipments for the manufacturer of a product. They have warehouses and distribution centers, and they ship products directly to the retailer. Digitization, increasing competition, emerging customer demand, and product innovation are some of shifts that the industry has been facing in recent times – something that is potentially creating needs/opportunities for business model revisions or transformations. Data, analytics, and technology are becoming increasingly important for whole distributors in anticipating and analyzing consumer needs, and therefore planning their business strategies accordingly. Fastenal Company, W.W. Grainger, Inc., Genuine Parts Company and Pool Corporation are some of the largest names in the business.
@Apparel/Footwear (-3.39% weekly)Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.
| CAL | DECK | KTB | |
| Capitalization | 417M | 15B | 3.87B |
| EBITDA | 70.8M | 1.42B | 403M |
| Gain YTD | 2.294 | 4.302 | 15.539 |
| P/E Ratio | 16.77 | 15.40 | 14.13 |
| Revenue | 2.76B | 5.38B | 3.15B |
| Total Cash | 29.8M | 2.09B | N/A |
| Total Debt | 891M | 343M | 1.5B |
CAL | DECK | KTB | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 73 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | 79 Overvalued | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 75 | 73 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 23 | 20 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 50 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 61 | 68 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 6 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CAL's Valuation (13) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as KTB (21) in the null industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for DECK (79) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that CAL's stock grew similarly to KTB’s and significantly faster than DECK’s over the last 12 months.
KTB's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as DECK (75) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry, and is in the same range as CAL (100) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that KTB's stock grew similarly to DECK’s and similarly to CAL’s over the last 12 months.
KTB's SMR Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as DECK (23) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for CAL (92) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that KTB's stock grew similarly to DECK’s and significantly faster than CAL’s over the last 12 months.
DECK's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as CAL (57) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry, and is in the same range as KTB (60) in the null industry. This means that DECK's stock grew similarly to CAL’s and similarly to KTB’s over the last 12 months.
CAL's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DECK (61) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for KTB (68) in the null industry. This means that CAL's stock grew somewhat faster than DECK’s and somewhat faster than KTB’s over the last 12 months.
| CAL | DECK | KTB | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 71% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 72% | 12 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 69% | 5 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 74% |
Advertisement
KTB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KTB has been loosely correlated with SHOO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KTB jumps, then SHOO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KTB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KTB | 100% | +2.07% | ||
| SHOO - KTB | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.92% | ||
| CROX - KTB | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.79% | ||
| LEVI - KTB | 52% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| COLM - KTB | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.03% | ||
| NKE - KTB | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.47% | ||
More | ||||