Advertisement
CAMT or COHU or MTSI
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Camtek Ltd (CAMT) vs. Cohu, Inc. (COHU) vs. MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- All three stocks—CAMT, COHU, and MTSI—have delivered exceptional year-to-date gains exceeding 110%, fueled by semiconductor demand in AI, data centers, and advanced packaging.
- MTSI leads with the largest market cap at approximately $28B and strongest recent earnings momentum from data center growth.
- COHU shows robust YTD performance at 120% with analyst upgrades, though recent quarterly profits were slim.
- CAMT benefits from inspection equipment demand in advanced packaging but experienced volatility around recent earnings.
- Valuation metrics indicate premium pricing across the board, with MTSI trading at elevated multiples amid optimistic guidance.
- Semiconductor sector exposure ties performance to AI and high-performance computing trends, with relative strength in recent market activity.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines CAMT, COHU, and MTSI, three semiconductor-related companies benefiting from surging demand in AI infrastructure, advanced packaging, and testing equipment. These firms operate in complementary niches within the semiconductor supply chain, making them relevant for investors tracking sector rotation and relative performance. Traders focused on momentum may appreciate their strong gains amid broader market positioning, while long-term holders evaluate growth drivers like data centers and high-performance computing (HPC). This analysis highlights recent market activity, business models, and key contrasts to inform stock comparison decisions.
CAMT Overview and Recent Performance
Camtek Ltd (CAMT) develops and manufactures inspection and metrology equipment essential for semiconductor production, serving advanced packaging, memory, and RF applications. Headquartered in Israel, the company targets integrated device manufacturers (IDMs), outsourced semiconductor assembly and test (OSATs), and foundries with systems like Eagle and MicroProf platforms. In recent market activity, CAMT shares have shown volatility, trading around $176 with a market cap of $8.2B, YTD return of 66%, and 1-year gain of 154%. Sentiment reflects demand for metrology in heterogeneous integration and high-bandwidth memory (HBM), though Q1 earnings introduced short-term pressure amid broader sector rotations. Performance has been influenced by capital spending cycles in chip fabrication.
COHU Overview and Recent Performance
Cohu, Inc. (COHU) supplies semiconductor test handlers, interfaces, automation, inspection, and metrology solutions to optimize yield in manufacturing. Based in California, it caters to automotive, computing, and consumer markets with products like Eclipse platforms for AI processors. Recent weeks saw COHU reach new 52-week highs near $51, boasting a $2.4B market cap, 120% YTD return, and 213% 1-year surge—the strongest among peers. Analyst upgrades post-Q1 results, citing HPC exposure and $30M orders, have boosted sentiment, despite modest profits. Momentum stems from AI test demand and improved semiconductor conditions.
MTSI Overview and Recent Performance
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI) designs analog semiconductors for RF, microwave, and optical applications in telecom, defense, and data centers. Offering amplifiers, switches, and subsystems, it supports 5G/6G, radar, and AI networking from its Massachusetts base. MTSI leads with a $28B market cap, shares at $366, 114% YTD, and 210% 1-year return. Recent Q2 earnings beat estimates with 23% revenue growth to $289M, driven by data center and defense demand, prompting upgraded outlooks and price targets to $375. Strong guidance has elevated market sentiment.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform’s top-performing AI trading bots, drawn from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and more. Only the most suitable for current market conditions—evaluated by AI analysis—earn a spot among the 25 trending robots out of 351 total. These bots employ diverse strategies like momentum, sector rotation, technical analysis, and multi-agent approaches, spanning timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes and risk levels (low, medium, high). Highlights include signal agents with no balance minimums, virtual agents with risk management, and brokerage agents, covering sectors like semiconductors, AI, and tech. Past performances have shown annualized returns up to 279%, win rates of 70-95%, and profit factors exceeding 3.0 in select strategies. Traders can explore these for copy trading insights tailored to volatile conditions—visit Trending AI Robots to review live signals and backtests.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CAMT, COHU, and MTSI share semiconductor exposure but differ in business models: CAMT focuses on metrology for front-end inspection, COHU on back-end testing/handling, and MTSI on analog components for end-use systems. Growth drivers include AI packaging for CAMT, HPC testing for COHU, and data center optics/defense for MTSI. Recent momentum favors COHU (213% 1-yr) and MTSI (210%), over CAMT's 154%, amid earnings beats. Risk factors involve cyclical capex; COHU shows profitability pressure (negative TTM EPS). Sector ties to semis amplify volatility. Valuations are stretched—CAMT P/S 19x, MTSI forward P/E 80x, COHU high forward P/E—sensitive to growth execution. Sentiment leans positive for MTSI post-guidance.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI would currently favor MTSI due to superior trend consistency from Q2 earnings beats, data center catalysts, and relative positioning with the largest market cap and upgraded analyst targets. While COHU exhibits strong momentum and CAMT solid stability in metrology, MTSI's defense/data center exposure offers higher probabilistic upside in prevailing AI-driven conditions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CAMT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCOHU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and MTSI’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
- CAMT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- COHU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MTSI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CAMT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while COHU’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and MTSI’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CAMT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- COHU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MTSI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CAMT (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а -7.05% price change this week, while COHU (@Electronic Production Equipment) price change was +3.14% , and MTSI (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated +1.04% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +128.49%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +92.80%.
Reported Earning Dates
CAMT is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
COHU is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
MTSI is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Production Equipment (-0.08% weekly)The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.
@Semiconductors (-0.06% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
| CAMT | COHU | MTSI | |
| Capitalization | 7.8B | 3.04B | 28.4B |
| EBITDA | 48.6M | 6.05M | 276M |
| Gain YTD | 83.916 | 201.332 | 131.352 |
| P/E Ratio | 201.77 | 51.42 | 168.62 |
| Revenue | 499M | 481M | 1.07B |
| Total Cash | 670M | 489M | 665M |
| Total Debt | 488M | 327M | 377M |
CAMT | COHU | MTSI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 31 | 80 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | 46 Fair valued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 45 | 3 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 79 | 94 | 62 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 34 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 5 | 17 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
COHU's Valuation (46) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTSI (84) in the Semiconductors industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for CAMT (86) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that COHU's stock grew somewhat faster than MTSI’s and somewhat faster than CAMT’s over the last 12 months.
MTSI's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as CAMT (26) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for COHU (45) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that MTSI's stock grew similarly to CAMT’s and somewhat faster than COHU’s over the last 12 months.
MTSI's SMR Rating (62) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as CAMT (79) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and is in the same range as COHU (94) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that MTSI's stock grew similarly to CAMT’s and similarly to COHU’s over the last 12 months.
COHU's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as MTSI (35) in the Semiconductors industry, and is in the same range as CAMT (36) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that COHU's stock grew similarly to MTSI’s and similarly to CAMT’s over the last 12 months.
CAMT's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as COHU (5) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and is in the same range as MTSI (17) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that CAMT's stock grew similarly to COHU’s and similarly to MTSI’s over the last 12 months.
| CAMT | COHU | MTSI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 72% | 19 days ago 70% | 7 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 85% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 82% |
Advertisement
CAMT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAMT has been closely correlated with NVMI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CAMT jumps, then NVMI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CAMT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAMT | 100% | +0.22% | ||
| NVMI - CAMT | 76% Closely correlated | +1.35% | ||
| AMAT - CAMT | 73% Closely correlated | +3.74% | ||
| KLAC - CAMT | 73% Closely correlated | +3.70% | ||
| ONTO - CAMT | 71% Closely correlated | +4.23% | ||
| LRCX - CAMT | 70% Closely correlated | +5.27% | ||
More | ||||
COHU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COHU has been closely correlated with DIOD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COHU jumps, then DIOD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COHU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COHU | 100% | +1.04% | ||
| DIOD - COHU | 73% Closely correlated | +2.75% | ||
| POWI - COHU | 70% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| UCTT - COHU | 69% Closely correlated | +1.45% | ||
| NXPI - COHU | 68% Closely correlated | +3.18% | ||
| SLAB - COHU | 68% Closely correlated | +0.00% | ||
More | ||||
MTSI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTSI has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTSI jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTSI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTSI | 100% | +1.24% | ||
| KLAC - MTSI | 70% Closely correlated | +3.70% | ||
| LRCX - MTSI | 70% Closely correlated | +5.27% | ||
| VECO - MTSI | 68% Closely correlated | -2.75% | ||
| AMKR - MTSI | 68% Closely correlated | +3.42% | ||
| AMAT - MTSI | 68% Closely correlated | +3.74% | ||
More | ||||