This comparison examines F, HMC, and TM, three major global automakers with significant exposure to passenger vehicles, trucks, and emerging mobility technologies. Investors and traders focused on the automotive sector often review these names together because of their overlapping yet differentiated business models, geographic footprints, and responses to industry-wide shifts such as electrification and supply chain dynamics. The analysis highlights observable performance patterns, market positioning, and recent developments to support informed evaluation of relative opportunities.
F operates as a leading U.S. automaker with a diverse portfolio spanning trucks, SUVs, commercial vehicles, and electric offerings. In recent market activity, the stock recorded gains during the final week of July 2026, closing at $14.68 after a two percent weekly advance. This movement followed the release of second-quarter results that exceeded expectations, prompting upward revisions to full-year guidance and a series of analyst rating improvements. Sentiment benefited from the company's demonstrated pricing discipline and operational execution amid ongoing industry competition.
HMC is a Japanese multinational known for motorcycles, automobiles, and power equipment, with a strong emphasis on hybrid and fuel-efficient models. During recent market activity, the stock closed at $30.11 on July 31, 2026, reflecting modest year-to-date returns of approximately 1.65 percent that lagged broader Japanese equity benchmarks. Performance has been influenced by earlier adjustments to electrification strategies and upcoming quarterly reporting scheduled for mid-August, with investors monitoring progress on U.S. market initiatives including new vehicle introductions.
TM ranks among the world's largest vehicle manufacturers, with leadership in hybrids, trucks, and global production networks. In recent market activity, shares closed at $188.99 on July 31, 2026, following a 1.28 percent daily decline amid mixed global sales data. Year-to-date performance showed a roughly 10 percent decline, even as U.S. sales posted modest quarterly gains driven by electrified models. Developments such as hydrogen technology partnerships have provided additional context for long-term positioning within the sector.
Tickeron maintains a dedicated Trending AI Robots page that curates the most relevant AI trading bots for prevailing market conditions. The platform offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots capable of trading thousands of different tickers across equities, with each bot featuring distinct trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance statistics, and ticker sets. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current trends and risk parameters earn placement in the trending section, allowing users to review ranges of historical win rates, drawdowns, and return profiles. Review the Trending AI Robots page for detailed bot specifications and performance data.
Business models differ notably: F maintains heavy North American truck and SUV exposure, while HMC and TM emphasize global diversification with stronger Asian manufacturing bases. Growth drivers include F's recent earnings momentum versus TM's hybrid leadership and HMC's motorcycle and efficiency focus. Recent momentum favored F following results, whereas HMC and TM navigated softer global volumes and currency considerations. Risk factors encompass EV transition costs for all three, with F showing greater sensitivity to U.S. policy shifts and the Japanese names more exposed to yen fluctuations. Valuation multiples reflect these contrasts, with lower price-to-earnings ratios often observed in the Japanese automakers amid varying profitability outlooks. Market sentiment has highlighted F's catalyst-driven moves against steadier but less reactive positioning for HMC and TM.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency following earnings, analyst rating momentum, and relative stability in guidance updates, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a higher probabilistic weighting to F in the near term. This positioning reflects the stock’s recent positive catalysts compared with more measured responses from HMC and TM. All assessments remain probabilistic and subject to evolving market data.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Disclaimers and LimitationsIt is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
F’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHMC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and TM’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
F’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HMC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and TM’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
F (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а -4.77% price change this week, while HMC (@Motor Vehicles) price change was +5.68% , and TM (@Motor Vehicles) price fluctuated +0.58% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -0.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was -21.07%.
F is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
HMC is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
TM is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.
| F | HMC | TM | |
| Capitalization | 55.7B | 41.4B | 223B |
| EBITDA | 3.51B | 1.77T | 7.63T |
| Gain YTD | 9.067 | 7.938 | -11.198 |
| P/E Ratio | 11.84 | 10.24 | 8.53 |
| Revenue | 188B | 21.34T | 50.69T |
| Total Cash | 31.3B | 5.04T | 16.64T |
| Total Debt | 163B | N/A | 43.21T |
F | HMC | TM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 95 | 46 | 31 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 70 Overvalued | 57 Fair valued | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 82 | 87 | 84 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 77 | 64 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 44 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 15 | 52 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 33 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TM's Valuation (11) in the Motor Vehicles industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HMC (57) and is somewhat better than the same rating for F (70). This means that TM's stock grew somewhat faster than HMC’s and somewhat faster than F’s over the last 12 months.
F's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as TM (84) and is in the same range as HMC (87). This means that F's stock grew similarly to TM’s and similarly to HMC’s over the last 12 months.
TM's SMR Rating (64) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as HMC (77) and is somewhat better than the same rating for F (97). This means that TM's stock grew similarly to HMC’s and somewhat faster than F’s over the last 12 months.
F's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as HMC (44) and is in the same range as TM (57). This means that F's stock grew similarly to HMC’s and similarly to TM’s over the last 12 months.
F's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as HMC (15) and is somewhat better than the same rating for TM (52). This means that F's stock grew similarly to HMC’s and somewhat faster than TM’s over the last 12 months.
| F | HMC | TM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 48% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 50% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 65% | 7 days ago 53% | 7 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 46% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 46% |