It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FTNT’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileRIOT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and SHOP’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FTNT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RIOT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and SHOP’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
FTNT (@Computer Communications) experienced а -5.72% price change this week, while RIOT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +23.38% , and SHOP (@Packaged Software) price fluctuated -7.94% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -5.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.81%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was -18.58%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.41%.
FTNT is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
RIOT is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
SHOP is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.63% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Packaged Software (-4.81% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| FTNT | RIOT | SHOP | |
| Capitalization | 112B | 8.52B | 148B |
| EBITDA | 2.6B | -476.51M | 2.14B |
| Gain YTD | 91.878 | 77.822 | -29.335 |
| P/E Ratio | 59.06 | 27.24 | 111.52 |
| Revenue | 7.11B | 653M | 12.4B |
| Total Cash | 3.3B | 206M | 5.74B |
| Total Debt | 497M | 877M | 179M |
FTNT | RIOT | SHOP | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 91 Overvalued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 10 | 98 | 67 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 45 | 70 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | 35 | 36 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 27 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SHOP's Valuation (87) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as RIOT (91) in the Financial Conglomerates industry, and is in the same range as FTNT (98) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that SHOP's stock grew similarly to RIOT’s and similarly to FTNT’s over the last 12 months.
FTNT's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Computer Communications industry is significantly better than the same rating for SHOP (100) in the Information Technology Services industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for RIOT (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that FTNT's stock grew significantly faster than SHOP’s and significantly faster than RIOT’s over the last 12 months.
FTNT's SMR Rating (10) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHOP (67) in the Information Technology Services industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for RIOT (98) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that FTNT's stock grew somewhat faster than SHOP’s and significantly faster than RIOT’s over the last 12 months.
FTNT's Price Growth Rating (2) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RIOT (45) in the Financial Conglomerates industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for SHOP (70) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FTNT's stock grew somewhat faster than RIOT’s and significantly faster than SHOP’s over the last 12 months.
FTNT's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as RIOT (35) in the Financial Conglomerates industry, and is in the same range as SHOP (36) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FTNT's stock grew similarly to RIOT’s and similarly to SHOP’s over the last 12 months.
| FTNT | RIOT | SHOP | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 90% | 13 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 10 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 80% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTNT has been loosely correlated with SHOP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTNT jumps, then SHOP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTNT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTNT | 100% | +0.55% | ||
| SHOP - FTNT | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.56% | ||
| DT - FTNT | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.39% | ||
| CRWD - FTNT | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| PANW - FTNT | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.57% | ||
| CRM - FTNT | 55% Loosely correlated | +4.29% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RIOT has been closely correlated with MSTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RIOT jumps, then MSTR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RIOT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RIOT | 100% | -5.57% | ||
| MSTR - RIOT | 79% Closely correlated | -2.09% | ||
| CLSK - RIOT | 78% Closely correlated | -6.98% | ||
| COIN - RIOT | 77% Closely correlated | -1.78% | ||
| CIFR - RIOT | 77% Closely correlated | -10.34% | ||
| HUT - RIOT | 75% Closely correlated | -6.53% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHOP has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHOP jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHOP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHOP | 100% | +1.56% | ||
| COIN - SHOP | 67% Closely correlated | -1.78% | ||
| CLSK - SHOP | 64% Loosely correlated | -6.98% | ||
| RIOT - SHOP | 62% Loosely correlated | -5.57% | ||
| FTNT - SHOP | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| PAYO - SHOP | 58% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||