IHG
Price
$170.75
Change
+$0.25 (+0.15%)
Updated
Jun 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
25.15B
55 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MAR
Price
$394.55
Change
-$4.55 (-1.14%)
Updated
Jun 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
104.05B
48 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WH
Price
$83.55
Change
-$1.81 (-2.12%)
Updated
Jun 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.26B
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IHG or MAR or WH

Header iconIHG vs MAR vs WH Comparison
Open Charts IHG vs MAR vs WHBanner chart's image
IHG vs MAR vs WH Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? InterContinental Hotels Group (IHG) vs. Marriott International (MAR) vs. Wyndham Hotels & Resorts (WH) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • MAR leads the trio with the strongest year-to-date performance at 14.64% and a one-year return of 46.88%, outpacing peers amid robust travel demand.
  • WH delivered solid Q1 2026 results, beating earnings estimates, though U.S. RevPAR (revenue per available room) remained flat.
  • IHG shares trade near 52-week highs, supported by ongoing buyback programs signaling management confidence.
  • All three stocks carry premium P/E (price-to-earnings) ratios above 29, highlighting growth expectations in the recovering hospitality sector.
  • MAR boasts the largest market cap at over $94 billion, providing scale advantages in global expansion.
  • Investor sentiment favors upscale operators like MAR and IHG over value-focused WH in recent weeks.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines three leading hotel franchisors—IHG, MAR, and WH—in the context of a resilient travel industry. As global leisure and business travel rebound, these asset-light operators benefit from expanding room pipelines and rising occupancy. Investors and traders tracking hospitality relative performance will find value in understanding their business models, recent momentum, and market positioning. With varying scales and segment focuses, the trio offers trade-offs in growth potential versus valuation sensitivity.

IHG Overview and Recent Performance

InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG) is a UK-headquartered multinational operator of premium and luxury hotel brands, including Holiday Inn and InterContinental, with a franchised model emphasizing fee-based revenue. In recent weeks, IHG shares have hovered near the top of their 52-week range ($109.79–$150.89), closing around $142.94 with a modest year-to-date gain of 1.81% and 34% over one year. Consistent share repurchases, including transactions in late April, have supported sentiment amid steady global demand. A P/E ratio of 29.41 reflects optimism for margin expansion, though European exposure adds macroeconomic sensitivity.

MAR Overview and Recent Performance

Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) stands as the world's largest hotel company by room count, managing upscale and luxury brands like Ritz-Carlton through a predominantly franchised structure. Recent market activity has propelled MAR shares upward, with a year-to-date rise of 14.64%, one-year return of 46.88%, and trading around $355 within a 52-week range of $246.50–$380. Anticipated Q1 earnings show expected EPS growth of 12.1%, fueled by strong RevPAR and international expansion. A P/E of 37.33 underscores premium pricing, bolstered by positive analyst upgrades.

WH Overview and Recent Performance

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH) focuses on economy and midscale brands like Days Inn, operating an asset-light franchise model with over 9,000 properties worldwide. In recent weeks, WH shares traded around $80.84, within a 52-week range of $69.21–$92.68, posting a year-to-date gain of 7.57% but lagging peers over one year at 3.32%. Q1 2026 results exceeded estimates, with system-wide RevPAR holding steady despite flat U.S. figures, driven by upscale and extended-stay growth. A P/E of 32.08 signals balanced valuation.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates 25 top-performing bots from its library of 351 AI trading bots, each scanning thousands of tickers for real-time signals suited to current market conditions. These bots showcase diverse strategies—from short-term scalping (5-minute holds) to swing trading (up to 49 days)—with standout stats including annualized returns up to 163%, win rates of 51–88%, profit factors to 11.70, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 17. Focused on high-momentum sectors like semiconductors and AI infrastructure, they employ risk controls such as take-profit/stop-loss corridors. Traders can copy these signals to align with prevailing trends; explore the page for bots matching your timeframe and risk profile.

Head-to-Head Comparison

IHG, MAR, and WH all leverage asset-light franchising for high margins, but differ in scale and positioning: MAR dominates with 94B market cap and broadest portfolio, IHG excels in premium segments, and WH targets value-conscious travelers. Growth drivers include pipeline expansions, with MAR and IHG benefiting more from luxury demand. Recent momentum favors MAR, while WH offers relative value. Risks are uniform—cyclicality tied to consumer spending and geopolitics—with WH less exposed to luxury slowdowns. Valuation sensitivity is high across the board, but IHG appears cheapest on P/E metrics. Market sentiment tilts toward leaders amid travel optimism.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors MAR for its superior trend consistency, YTD momentum, scale-driven catalysts, and analyst support, positioning it ahead in the hospitality recovery. IHG and WH trail but offer stability for diversified exposure.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 18, 2026
Stock price -- (IHG: $170.50MAR: $399.10WH: $85.36)
Brand notoriety: IHG and WH are not notable and MAR is notable
The three companies represent the Cable/Satellite TV industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IHG: 110%, MAR: 131%, WH: 132%
Market capitalization -- IHG: $25.15B, MAR: $104.05B, WH: $6.26B
$IHG is valued at $25.15B, while MAR has a market capitalization of $104.05B, and WH's market capitalization is $6.26B. The market cap for tickers in this @Cable/Satellite TV ranges from $104.05B to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Cable/Satellite TV industry is $23.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IHG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMAR’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s), and WH’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • IHG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MAR’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • WH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, IHG is a better buy in the long-term than MAR, which in turn is a better option than WH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IHG’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and WH’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IHG’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MAR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAR is a better buy in the short-term than WH, which in turn is a better option than IHG.

Price Growth

IHG (@Cable/Satellite TV) experienced а +4.62% price change this week, while MAR (@Cable/Satellite TV) price change was +1.39% , and WH (@Cable/Satellite TV) price fluctuated +6.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Cable/Satellite TV industry was +3.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

IHG is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

MAR is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

WH is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Cable/Satellite TV (+3.99% weekly)

Companies that operate paid and subscriber-based broadcast facilities for cable and home satellite systems. Comcast Corp, Charter Communications, Inc. and DISH Network Corporation are some of the biggest cable/satellite TV providers. Customers typically pay a regular monthly fee to cable TV operators for unlimited access to a certain package of channels. Since the rising popularity of online streaming services have increased instances of cord-cutting among consumers, several cable operators have also diversified into internet services to milk the burgeoning appetite for internet-based content.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAR($104B) has a higher market cap than IHG($25.1B) and WH($6.26B). MAR has higher P/E ratio than IHG and WH: MAR (41.32) vs IHG (35.08) and WH (33.16). MAR YTD gains are higher at: 27.692 vs. IHG (22.257) and WH (11.811). MAR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.94B vs. IHG (1.42B) and WH (475M). WH has more cash in the bank: 749M vs. MAR (454M) and IHG (160M). WH has less debt than IHG and MAR: WH (2.65B) vs IHG (4.61B) and MAR (17.4B). MAR has higher revenues than IHG and WH: MAR (26.6B) vs IHG (5.19B) and WH (1.44B).
IHGMARWH
Capitalization25.1B104B6.26B
EBITDA1.42B4.94B475M
Gain YTD22.25727.69211.811
P/E Ratio35.0841.3233.16
Revenue5.19B26.6B1.44B
Total Cash160M454M749M
Total Debt4.61B17.4B2.65B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IHG vs MAR vs WH: Fundamental Ratings
IHG
MAR
WH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
391713
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
97
Overvalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
141273
SMR RATING
1..100
9430
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
401152
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
342313
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
352821

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IHG's Valuation (46) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as WH (59) and is somewhat better than the same rating for MAR (97). This means that IHG's stock grew similarly to WH’s and somewhat faster than MAR’s over the last 12 months.

MAR's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as IHG (14) and is somewhat better than the same rating for WH (73). This means that MAR's stock grew similarly to IHG’s and somewhat faster than WH’s over the last 12 months.

MAR's SMR Rating (4) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as IHG (9) and is in the same range as WH (30). This means that MAR's stock grew similarly to IHG’s and similarly to WH’s over the last 12 months.

MAR's Price Growth Rating (11) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as IHG (40) and is somewhat better than the same rating for WH (52). This means that MAR's stock grew similarly to IHG’s and somewhat faster than WH’s over the last 12 months.

WH's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as MAR (23) and is in the same range as IHG (34). This means that WH's stock grew similarly to MAR’s and similarly to IHG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IHGMARWH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IHG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MAR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XJUN44.34-0.01
-0.02%
FT Vest US Eq Enh&Mod Bffr ETF June
HYBI49.12-0.17
-0.34%
NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF
RINF32.45-0.20
-0.61%
ProShares Inflation Expectations
VUG85.61-1.18
-1.36%
Vanguard Growth ETF
BITX12.48-0.58
-4.46%
2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF

IHG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IHG has been closely correlated with MAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IHG jumps, then MAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IHG
1D Price
Change %
IHG100%
+0.09%
MAR - IHG
77%
Closely correlated
-1.13%
HLT - IHG
70%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
H - IHG
67%
Closely correlated
+2.46%
WH - IHG
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.10%
CHH - IHG
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.96%
More

MAR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAR has been closely correlated with HLT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAR jumps, then HLT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAR
1D Price
Change %
MAR100%
-1.13%
HLT - MAR
84%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
H - MAR
76%
Closely correlated
+2.46%
IHG - MAR
74%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
WH - MAR
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.10%
CHH - MAR
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.96%
More

WH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WH has been closely correlated with CHH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WH jumps, then CHH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WH
1D Price
Change %
WH100%
-2.10%
CHH - WH
68%
Closely correlated
-1.96%
HLT - WH
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
MAR - WH
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.13%
H - WH
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.46%
IHG - WH
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
More