PepsiCo’s second-quarter results offer a clear window into consumer spending patterns in its largest market and the progress of its global expansion efforts. The company follows a calendar fiscal year and reported results for the 12 weeks ended June 13, 2026. Recent periods have highlighted resilience in international operations that has helped offset softer demand in the U.S., making this report a useful check on whether productivity initiatives and product innovation can maintain momentum despite macroeconomic pressures.
PepsiCo posted net revenue of $24.18 billion, a 6.4% increase from $22.73 billion a year earlier and above Wall Street forecasts of approximately $23.97 billion. Organic revenue rose 2.4%, supported by net pricing and volume contributions. GAAP earnings per share surged 137% to $2.18, while core EPS advanced 4% to $2.20, just missing the $2.21 consensus. Core constant currency EPS increased 1%. Operating profit grew significantly due to the absence of prior-year impairment charges, though core operating margin contracted 40 basis points. The company reaffirmed its fiscal 2026 outlook for organic revenue growth of 2% to 4% and core constant currency EPS growth of 4% to 6%.
Shares of PEP fell in after-hours trading following the release, reflecting investor disappointment with the slight EPS miss and continued softness in North American categories. Analysts noted that while revenue exceeded expectations, domestic volume trends and margin pressure weighed on sentiment. Pre-earnings positioning had been cautious amid broader consumer staples weakness, and the mixed results reinforced concerns about U.S. spending resilience.
Investors will focus on PepsiCo’s ability to sustain international momentum while addressing North American challenges. Management highlighted ongoing innovation in functional and permissible products, affordability initiatives, and productivity efforts to improve operating leverage. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
Upcoming catalysts include third-quarter volume trends across segments and updates on brand restaging programs. Cost inflation, foreign exchange movements, and consumer response to pricing actions remain important variables.
Guidance affirmation suggests management views the current environment as manageable, but execution on productivity and portfolio evolution will be closely watched in coming quarters. Free cash flow conversion and capital spending discipline also merit attention as the company navigates a dynamic demand landscape.
When analyzing results like these, I find it helpful to cross-reference with Tickeron’s AI Screener. It is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. AI Screener
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Disclaimers and LimitationsPEP may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In of 43 cases where PEP's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where PEP's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, of 27 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are .
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for PEP just turned positive on July 02, 2026. Looking at past instances where PEP's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in of 46 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PEP advanced for three days, in of 309 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In of 65 cases where PEP's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on July 09, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on PEP as a result. In of 87 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
The 50-day moving average for PEP moved below the 200-day moving average on June 29, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PEP declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
The Aroon Indicator for PEP entered a downward trend on July 01, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (9.107) is normal, around the industry mean (7.816). P/E Ratio (22.372) is within average values for comparable stocks, (45.601). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.534) is also within normal values, averaging (5.067). PEP has a moderately high Dividend Yield (0.040) as compared to the industry average of (0.026). P/S Ratio (2.048) is also within normal values, averaging (3.393).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. PEP’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. PEP’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 71, placing this stock worse than average.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
a provider of a diversified line of soft drinks and snack foods
Industry BeveragesNonAlcoholic