Investors and traders often compare stocks within the same industry to assess relative value, growth trajectories, and risk-adjusted opportunities. Autodesk (ADSK) and Freshworks (FRSH) both belong to the application software sector yet represent distinct stages of company maturity and market focus. This comparison appeals to those evaluating established design software leaders against emerging customer experience platforms, particularly in the context of recent market volatility and sector-specific developments. Professional and retail participants seeking balanced insights into business models, momentum, and positioning may find the analysis relevant for portfolio construction or tactical decisions.
Autodesk (ADSK) provides 3D design, engineering, and entertainment software solutions used across architecture, manufacturing, and media industries. In recent weeks, the stock has faced downward pressure, trading well below its 52-week high near $329 and hovering around $241 amid concerns over competition in the software space. Market activity reflects tempered sentiment ahead of the company’s upcoming first-quarter earnings, with analysts projecting approximately 24% EPS growth and 16% revenue growth year-over-year. Broader sector dynamics and valuation considerations have influenced performance, though the firm maintains a premium positioning supported by recurring subscription revenue.
Freshworks (FRSH) delivers cloud-based software for customer support, sales, and marketing automation, targeting mid-market and enterprise clients. Recent performance shows resilience, with shares closing near $9.08 and delivering year-to-date returns of approximately 26% as of late May. The company reported first-quarter revenue of $228.6 million, reflecting 16% year-over-year growth, alongside an earnings beat that supported positive sentiment. Despite trading below prior 52-week highs near $16, FRSH has demonstrated relative strength compared to broader market benchmarks over the trailing twelve months, driven by expanding annual recurring revenue in its core offerings.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the most suitable AI trading bots from a library of hundreds that analyze and trade thousands of different tickers across global markets. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing conditions, based on backtested and forward-tested metrics such as annualized returns, Sharpe ratios, profit factors, and drawdown profiles, earn placement in this section. Available bots span diverse strategies, timeframes, and ticker universes, enabling users to review detailed statistics before engaging. This resource supports informed exploration of automated approaches tailored to individual preferences and market environments.
Autodesk (ADSK) operates a mature business model centered on high-value design tools with sticky enterprise relationships, whereas Freshworks (FRSH) emphasizes agile SaaS platforms for customer engagement with emphasis on rapid deployment and scalability. Growth drivers for ADSK include AI-enhanced features and subscription expansion, while FRSH benefits from increasing adoption in service management and marketing automation. Recent momentum favors FRSH on a year-to-date basis, though ADSK exhibits lower volatility typical of its larger market capitalization. Sector exposure overlaps in software applications, yet ADSK faces broader cyclical sensitivity in design markets compared to FRSH’s focus on operational efficiency tools. Risk factors include execution on earnings catalysts for ADSK and competitive intensity plus path to profitability for FRSH. Market sentiment remains constructive for both but reflects greater near-term uncertainty around ADSK’s upcoming report.
Based on observable factors including trend consistency, earnings visibility, and relative stability, Tickeron’s AI models would likely assign a modest edge to Autodesk (ADSK) in the current environment. The larger company’s established recurring revenue base and analyst-projected growth provide a more predictable profile compared to the higher-beta characteristics of Freshworks (FRSH). That said, FRSH’s recent outperformance and growth trajectory introduce meaningful trade-offs that could shift positioning depending on post-earnings developments and broader market conditions. This assessment reflects probabilistic evaluation rather than certainty.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ADSK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFRSH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ADSK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRSH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ADSK (@Packaged Software) experienced а -6.26% price change this week, while FRSH (@Packaged Software) price change was -3.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.66%.
ADSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.
FRSH is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| ADSK | FRSH | ADSK / FRSH | |
| Capitalization | 40.7B | 2.59B | 1,571% |
| EBITDA | 2.33B | 42.9M | 5,424% |
| Gain YTD | -36.225 | -24.980 | 145% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.40 | 14.54 | 189% |
| Revenue | 7.51B | 871M | 862% |
| Total Cash | 2.92B | 779M | 375% |
| Total Debt | 2.72B | 38.8M | 7,021% |
ADSK | FRSH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 69 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | 56 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 91 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 20 | 51 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 31 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FRSH's Valuation (56) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as ADSK (75) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to ADSK’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as ADSK (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to ADSK’s over the last 12 months.
ADSK's SMR Rating (20) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as FRSH (51) in the Restaurants industry. This means that ADSK’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as ADSK (65) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to ADSK’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ADSK (95) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew somewhat faster than ADSK’s over the last 12 months.
| ADSK | FRSH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 66% | 7 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 74% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ADSK has been loosely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ADSK jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ADSK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADSK | 100% | +0.56% | ||
| CLSK - ADSK | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| CRWD - ADSK | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| BSY - ADSK | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.66% | ||
| CRM - ADSK | 63% Loosely correlated | +2.20% | ||
| PANW - ADSK | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.58% | ||
More | ||||