GS
Price
$498.43
Change
-$5.40 (-1.07%)
Updated
Sep 20 closing price
24 days until earnings call
MS
Price
$102.47
Change
+$1.74 (+1.73%)
Updated
Sep 20 closing price
25 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GS vs MS

Header iconGS vs MS Comparison
Open Charts GS vs MSBanner chart's image
Goldman Sachs Group
Price$498.43
Change-$5.40 (-1.07%)
Volume$4.45M
CapitalizationN/A
Morgan Stanley
Price$102.47
Change+$1.74 (+1.73%)
Volume$14.51M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
GS vs MS Comparison Chart
Loading...
GS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
GS vs. MS commentary
Sep 21, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GS is a Sell and MS is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 21, 2024
Stock price -- (GS: $498.43 vs. MS: $102.47)
Brand notoriety: GS and MS are both notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GS: 195% vs. MS: 226%
Market capitalization -- GS: $134.2B vs. MS: $153.98B
GS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $134.2B. MS’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $153.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GS and MS are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GS is a better buy in the short-term than MS.

Price Growth

GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +4.06% price change this week, while MS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +4.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

GS is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2024.

MS is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.73% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MS($154B) has a higher market cap than GS($134B). GS (18.08) and MS (18.06) have similar P/E ratio . GS YTD gains are higher at: 31.681 vs. MS (12.997). MS has less debt than GS: MS (276B) vs GS (333B). MS has higher revenues than GS: MS (50.7B) vs GS (46.3B).
GSMSGS / MS
Capitalization134B154B87%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD31.68112.997244%
P/E Ratio18.0818.06100%
Revenue46.3B50.7B91%
Total CashN/A4.29B-
Total Debt333B276B121%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GS vs MS: Fundamental Ratings
GS
MS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1173
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
812
SMR RATING
1..100
65
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1449
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4849
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MS's Valuation (93) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as GS (95). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to GS’s over the last 12 months.

GS's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MS (12). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to MS’s over the last 12 months.

MS's SMR Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as GS (6). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to GS’s over the last 12 months.

GS's Price Growth Rating (14) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MS (49). This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MS’s over the last 12 months.

GS's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MS (49). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to MS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSMS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GREE1.790.02
+1.13%
Greenidge Generation Holdings
STRL148.200.58
+0.39%
Sterling Infrastructure
CMI308.24-0.90
-0.29%
Cummins
PUBM14.53-0.15
-1.02%
PubMatic
REFI15.78-0.17
-1.07%
Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance