IESC($13.8B) has a higher market cap than GVA($5.28B). GVA (32.12) and IESC (30.72) have similar P/E ratio . IESC YTD gains are higher at: 77.734 vs. GVA (3.295). IESC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 639M vs. GVA (189M). GVA has more cash in the bank: 1.05B vs. IESC (388M). IESC has less debt than GVA: IESC (76.9M) vs GVA (1.73B). GVA has higher revenues than IESC: GVA (4.97B) vs IESC (3.99B).

	GVA	IESC	GVA / IESC
Capitalization	5.28B	13.8B	38%
EBITDA	189M	639M	30%
Gain YTD	3.295	77.734	4%
P/E Ratio	32.12	30.72	105%
Revenue	4.97B	3.99B	125%
Total Cash	1.05B	388M	269%
Total Debt	1.73B	76.9M	2,252%

FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS

GVA vs IESC: Fundamental Ratings

	GVA	IESC
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100	78	16
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100	44 Fair valued	80 Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100	27	33
SMR RATING 1..100	95	23
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100	61	47
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100	58	34
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100	50	n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GVA's Valuation (44) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IESC (80). This means that GVA’s stock grew somewhat faster than IESC’s over the last 12 months.

GVA's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as IESC (33). This means that GVA’s stock grew similarly to IESC’s over the last 12 months.

IESC's SMR Rating (23) in the Engineering And Construction industry is significantly better than the same rating for GVA (95). This means that IESC’s stock grew significantly faster than GVA’s over the last 12 months.

IESC's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as GVA (61). This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to GVA’s over the last 12 months.

IESC's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as GVA (58). This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to GVA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

Technical Analysis

	GVA	IESC
RSI ODDS (%)	N/A	2 days ago 80%
Stochastic ODDS (%)	2 days ago 65%	2 days ago 70%
Momentum ODDS (%)	2 days ago 57%	2 days ago 85%
MACD ODDS (%)	2 days ago 57%	2 days ago 83%
TrendWeek ODDS (%)	2 days ago 61%	2 days ago 87%
TrendMonth ODDS (%)	2 days ago 67%	2 days ago 68%
Advances ODDS (%)	10 days ago 68%	5 days ago 86%
Declines ODDS (%)	3 days ago 55%	3 days ago 67%
BollingerBands ODDS (%)	2 days ago 65%	2 days ago 89%
Aroon ODDS (%)	3 days ago 45%	N/A

COMPARISON

Comparison

Sep 12, 2026

Stock price -- (GVA: $118.92 vs. IESC: $345.71)

Brand notoriety: GVA and IESC are both not notable

Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry

Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GVA: 71% vs. IESC: 70%

Market capitalization -- GVA: $5.28B vs. IESC: $13.78B

GVA [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $5.28B. IESC’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $13.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $15.66K to $14.67T. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GVA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while IESC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

GVA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
IESC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.

According to our system of comparison, IESC is a better buy in the long-term than GVA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GVA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IESC’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

GVA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
IESC’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.

According to our system of comparison, IESC is a better buy in the short-term than GVA.

Price Growth

GVA (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -0.32% price change this week, while IESC (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +7.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -3.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -12.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

GVA is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

IESC is expected to report earnings on Dec 09, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (-3.36% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

View a ticker or compare two or three

GVA

Daily Signal:

Gain/Loss:

IESC

Setup

Daily Signal:

Description

Gain/Loss:

Trend Trader, Long Only: Profitability Model for Russell 2000 Stocks, 60 min, (FA)Trend Trader, Long Only: Profitability Model for Russell 2000 Stocks, 60 min, (FA)

VIEW DETAILS VIEW DETAILS

VIEW FOR FREE VIEW FOR FREE

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

ETFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
SHOC	104.84	1.27	+1.22%
Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF
VONV	112.09	0.97	+0.87%
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
FLCA	54.06	0.25	+0.46%
Franklin FTSE Canada ETF
DDFF	20.29	0.04	+0.22%
Innovator Eq Dual Drctnl 15 Buf ETF™ Feb
SPAQ	93.75	N/A	N/A
Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF

GVA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GVA has been loosely correlated with ROAD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GVA jumps, then ROAD could also see price increases.

Ticker / NAME	Correlation To GVA	1D Price Change %
GVA	100%	+3.18%
ROAD - GVA	62% Loosely correlated	+3.69%
MYRG - GVA	53% Loosely correlated	+2.39%
FIX - GVA	50% Loosely correlated	+6.29%
PWR - GVA	47% Loosely correlated	+5.15%
ORN - GVA	46% Loosely correlated	+3.31%
More

IESC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IESC has been closely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IESC jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.

Ticker / NAME	Correlation To IESC	1D Price Change %
IESC	100%	+8.20%
FIX - IESC	74% Closely correlated	+6.29%
STRL - IESC	65% Loosely correlated	+5.40%
ECG - IESC	64% Loosely correlated	+3.64%
MYRG - IESC	63% Loosely correlated	+2.39%
GVA - IESC	55% Loosely correlated	+3.18%
More