Advertisement
MSCI vs NDAQ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSCI is a StrongBuy and NDAQ is a Hold.
MSCI | NDAQ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 14 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 67 Overvalued | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 35 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 7 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 63 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MSCI's Valuation (67) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as NDAQ (82) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that MSCI’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.
NDAQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MSCI (100) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than MSCI’s over the last 12 months.
MSCI's SMR Rating (7) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NDAQ (52) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that MSCI’s stock grew somewhat faster than NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.
NDAQ's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MSCI (53) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to MSCI’s over the last 12 months.
NDAQ's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MSCI (65) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to MSCI’s over the last 12 months.
| MSCI | NDAQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 58% | 9 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 44% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MSCI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while NDAQ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- MSCI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NDAQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MSCI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NDAQ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MSCI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NDAQ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
MSCI (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -2.91% price change this week, while NDAQ (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -2.19% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.79%.
Reported Earning Dates
MSCI is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.
NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Publishing/Services (-2.86% weekly)The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
Advertisement
MSCI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSCI has been closely correlated with SPGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MSCI jumps, then SPGI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MSCI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSCI | 100% | -1.57% | ||
| SPGI - MSCI | 69% Closely correlated | -1.83% | ||
| MCO - MSCI | 68% Closely correlated | -1.84% | ||
| MORN - MSCI | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.26% | ||
| NDAQ - MSCI | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| JEF - MSCI | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.15% | ||
More | ||||