MUSA
Price
$488.28
Change
+$6.68 (+1.39%)
Updated
Jan 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.88B
21 days until earnings call
PAG
Price
$156.61
Change
+$3.34 (+2.18%)
Updated
Jan 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.86B
22 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MUSA vs PAG

Header iconMUSA vs PAG Comparison
Open Charts MUSA vs PAGBanner chart's image
Murphy USA
Price$488.28
Change+$6.68 (+1.39%)
Volume$900
Capitalization8.88B
Penske Automotive Group
Price$156.61
Change+$3.34 (+2.18%)
Volume$1.23K
Capitalization10.86B
MUSA vs PAG Comparison Chart
Loading...
MUSA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MUSA vs. PAG commentary
Jan 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MUSA is a StrongBuy and PAG is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2025
Stock price -- (MUSA: $488.46 vs. PAG: $156.53)
Brand notoriety: MUSA and PAG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MUSA: 105% vs. PAG: 104%
Market capitalization -- MUSA: $8.88B vs. PAG: $10.86B
MUSA [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $8.88B. PAG’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $10.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MUSA’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePAG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MUSA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PAG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MUSA and PAG are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MUSA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MUSA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PAG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MUSA and PAG are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MUSA (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -0.99% price change this week, while PAG (@Specialty Stores) price change was +3.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -1.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

MUSA is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

PAG is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-1.34% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAG($10.9B) has a higher market cap than MUSA($8.88B). MUSA has higher P/E ratio than PAG: MUSA (16.75) vs PAG (10.37). PAG YTD gains are higher at: 0.544 vs. MUSA (-2.649). PAG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.79B vs. MUSA (1.06B). MUSA has more cash in the bank: 125M vs. PAG (96.4M). MUSA has less debt than PAG: MUSA (2.27B) vs PAG (7.74B). PAG has higher revenues than MUSA: PAG (29.5B) vs MUSA (21.5B).
MUSAPAGMUSA / PAG
Capitalization8.88B10.9B82%
EBITDA1.06B1.79B59%
Gain YTD-2.6490.544-486%
P/E Ratio16.7510.37162%
Revenue21.5B29.5B73%
Total Cash125M96.4M130%
Total Debt2.27B7.74B29%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MUSA vs PAG: Fundamental Ratings
MUSA
PAG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7164
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
26
SMR RATING
1..100
1750
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5357
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2525
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAG's Valuation (73) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as MUSA (86). This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to MUSA’s over the last 12 months.

MUSA's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as PAG (6). This means that MUSA’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.

MUSA's SMR Rating (17) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAG (50). This means that MUSA’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAG’s over the last 12 months.

MUSA's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as PAG (57). This means that MUSA’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.

MUSA's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as PAG (25). This means that MUSA’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MUSAPAG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
57%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MUSA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UNL8.720.08
+0.93%
United States 12 Month Natural Gas
OILK46.400.15
+0.32%
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETF
FDEC44.430.07
+0.16%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Dec
DMAY40.630.05
+0.12%
FT Vest US Equity Deep Bffr ETF May
VOOG362.54-0.70
-0.19%
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF

PAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAG has been closely correlated with GPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAG jumps, then GPI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAG
1D Price
Change %
PAG100%
+1.34%
GPI - PAG
85%
Closely correlated
+1.75%
ABG - PAG
82%
Closely correlated
+1.73%
SAH - PAG
82%
Closely correlated
+0.96%
AN - PAG
78%
Closely correlated
+2.67%
LAD - PAG
71%
Closely correlated
+2.33%
More