UPS
Price
$114.79
Change
+$0.69 (+0.60%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
97.57B
3 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XPO
Price
$213.01
Change
-$1.15 (-0.54%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
25.01B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

UPS vs XPO

UPS vs XPO Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? United Parcel Service (UPS) vs. XPO (XPO) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • UPS is a global parcel delivery and logistics giant with $88.7 billion in full-year 2025 revenue, currently navigating a significant strategic transformation that includes workforce reductions and a deliberate decoupling from Amazon business.
  • XPO is a focused leader in North American less-than-truckload (LTL) freight transportation, reporting Q4 2025 revenue of $2.01 billion and delivering its twelfth consecutive quarter of sequential growth in revenue per shipment.
  • UPS is reshaping its cost structure through aggressive efficiency measures — cutting approximately 48,000 positions since last year — while returning substantial capital to shareholders through a quarterly dividend yielding approximately 6.1%.
  • XPO has demonstrated consistent margin expansion in its core North American LTL segment, with an adjusted operating ratio improvement of 180 basis points year-over-year, driven by AI-powered productivity initiatives and pricing discipline.
  • From a market positioning standpoint, UPS offers stability and income, while XPO presents a growth-oriented value proposition within the freight transportation sector, with significant operating leverage potential in a freight recovery scenario.

Introduction

Transportation and logistics stocks sit at the intersection of global trade, e-commerce trends, and industrial activity — making them bellwethers for broader economic health. This comparison examines UPS (United Parcel Service) and XPO (XPO, Inc.), two companies that occupy distinct but overlapping niches within the logistics ecosystem. UPS is a diversified global parcel delivery and supply chain powerhouse, while XPO has sharpened its focus on asset-based less-than-truckload (LTL) freight transportation in North America, complemented by a growing European footprint. For investors weighing income-oriented stability against operational turnaround and growth potential, this head-to-head comparison offers a data-driven look at two compelling but fundamentally different opportunities in the transportation sector.

UPS Overview and Recent Performance

UPS remains one of the world's largest package delivery companies, operating across three primary segments: U.S. Domestic, International, and Supply Chain Solutions. The company generated full-year 2025 consolidated revenue of $88.7 billion and returned $6.4 billion to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases. In recent quarters, UPS has undertaken what CEO Carol Tomé has described as "the most significant strategic shift" in company history. This includes reducing lower-margin Amazon volume, accelerating fleet modernization with the retirement of its MD-11 aircraft fleet, and implementing sweeping workforce reductions — approximately 48,000 positions eliminated since last year. The company has also streamlined its operational footprint, closing daily operations at dozens of facilities. Revenue per piece grew 8.3% in the U.S. Domestic segment during the fourth quarter of 2025, reflecting a deliberate pivot toward revenue quality over volume. The company's quarterly dividend of $1.64 per share offers investors a yield around 6.1%, positioning UPS as an income-oriented holding. Looking ahead, UPS projects full-year 2026 revenue of approximately $89.7 billion with a non-GAAP (non-Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) adjusted operating margin of around 9.6%.

XPO Overview and Recent Performance

XPO has emerged as a focused leader in asset-based less-than-truckload (LTL) freight transportation — a segment that consolidates shipments from multiple customers into single trucks, optimizing efficiency and cost. The company moves approximately 16 billion pounds of freight annually, serving 55,000 customers across 592 locations in North America and Europe. In its fourth quarter of 2025, XPO reported total revenue of $2.01 billion, a 4.7% year-over-year increase that surpassed analyst expectations. The North American LTL segment generated $1.17 billion in revenue, with adjusted operating income rising 13.8% to $181 million and its adjusted operating ratio improving 180 basis points to 84.4%. Critically, XPO achieved its twelfth consecutive quarter of sequential improvement in revenue per shipment excluding fuel, reflecting sustained pricing power. The European Transportation segment recorded its eighth straight quarter of revenue growth, contributing $846 million with a 19% year-over-year increase in adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization). CEO Mario Harik has emphasized the role of proprietary AI technology in reducing cost-to-serve through improved network efficiency and labor productivity. The company ended 2025 with $310 million in cash on hand and a net leverage ratio of 2.4 times trailing adjusted EBITDA.

Trending AI Robots

In an increasingly data-driven investing landscape, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of the platform's most effective AI-powered trading bots, chosen for their suitability to prevailing market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively scan thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and other asset classes, but only the strongest performers — those demonstrating the most adaptive strategies, robust risk management, and consistent returns — earn a place in this curated section. These bots operate across varying timeframes, from rapid 5-minute and 15-minute agents designed for active traders to 60-minute and longer-duration strategies for position-oriented approaches. Performance among top-ranked bots in recent months has shown annualized return figures spanning a wide range, with some agents achieving triple-digit returns amid volatile market conditions. Each bot employs distinct trading styles, technical indicator combinations, and risk parameters, allowing users to explore strategies that align with their individual objectives. To see which robots are currently trending and how they are positioned across the market, visit the Trending AI Robots page.

Head-to-Head Comparison

While both UPS and XPO operate in the transportation and logistics sector, their business models, growth trajectories, and risk profiles diverge meaningfully. UPS is a diversified global behemoth handling small-package delivery, freight, and supply chain solutions — its scale is enormous, with annual revenue roughly 44 times that of XPO. Yet that scale brings complexity: UPS is simultaneously managing an Amazon volume wind-down, tariff-related disruptions to China-origin shipments, and a multi-year cost-restructuring program. XPO, by contrast, operates with a concentrated focus on LTL freight, an industry segment where pricing discipline and network efficiency directly translate to margin performance. XPO's adjusted operating ratio of 84.4% signals a leaner operational model, and its 30% excess door capacity positions it to capture volume upside without proportional cost increases if freight demand recovers. UPS offers a 6.1% dividend yield and massive free cash flow generation; XPO offers no dividend but is actively repurchasing shares and investing in technology-driven productivity. On risk, UPS faces ongoing labor and restructuring uncertainty alongside macroeconomic headwinds in global trade. XPO's risks center on industrial sector softness — tonnage per day declined 4.5% in Q4 — and the pace of AI productivity gains materializing as projected. Sentiment-wise, UPS is broadly viewed as a turnaround and income story, while XPO is seen as a margin-expansion and recovery-leverage play.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, operational momentum, and relative positioning within the current market environment, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely favor XPO in this comparison. The rationale centers on XPO's sustained upward trajectory in key operational metrics — twelve consecutive quarters of improvement in revenue per shipment, a 180-basis-point expansion in its adjusted operating ratio, and validated AI-driven productivity gains — all of which suggest a durable earnings growth narrative. While UPS offers compelling income characteristics and the potential for a successful strategic pivot, its near-term picture includes declining volumes, workforce disruption, and the ongoing recalibration of its Amazon relationship. XPO's leaner operational structure, clearer pricing power, and capacity to benefit disproportionately from any freight market recovery align more closely with the momentum and efficiency signals that AI models tend to prioritize. This assessment reflects a probabilistic evaluation of trend strength and catalyst visibility rather than any definitive prediction of future stock performance.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
UPS vs. XPO commentary
Jul 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is UPS is a StrongBuy and XPO is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 25, 2026
Stock price -- (UPS: $114.79 vs. XPO: $213.01)
Brand notoriety: UPS: Notable vs. XPO: Not notable
UPS represents the Other Transportation, while XPO is part of the Trucking industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: UPS: 74% vs. XPO: 64%
Market capitalization -- UPS: $97.57B vs. XPO: $25.01B
UPS [@Other Transportation] is valued at $97.57B. XPO’s [@Trucking] market capitalization is $25.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Transportation] industry ranges from $97.57B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Trucking] industry ranges from $48.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Transportation] industry is $10.22B. The average market capitalization across the [@Trucking] industry is $8.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

UPS’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileXPO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • UPS’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • XPO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both UPS and XPO are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

UPS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XPO’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • UPS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • XPO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, XPO is a better buy in the short-term than UPS.

Price Growth

UPS (@Other Transportation) experienced а -2.49% price change this week, while XPO (@Trucking) price change was -0.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Transportation industry was -4.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was -15.16%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucking industry was -3.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

UPS is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

XPO is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Transportation (-4.01% weekly)

Other Transportation includes transportation services like providing airport ground transportation, airport management and equipment, shipping services, as well as businesses that operate bridges, expressways and other public services such as taxis and subways. Grupo Aero-pac, Corporacion America Airports S.A. and Matson, Inc. are some of the major companies operating in this space.

@Trucking (-3.76% weekly)

The trucking industry provides road transportation delivery and logistical services, including moving large quantities of raw materials, works in process, and finished goods —often from manufacturing plants to retail distribution centers. Trucks are also used in the construction industry, as they transport large amounts of rocks, concrete, and other building materials used in construction. Trucks in the U.S. are responsible for the majority of freight movement over land, and therefore play an important role in the manufacturing, transportation, and warehousing industries. The business could be affected by economic cycles, since it is closely linked with manufacturing, retail and construction. Some of the major trucking companies in the U.S. are Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc., J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc., and XPO Logistics, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UPS($97.6B) has a higher market cap than XPO($25B). XPO has higher P/E ratio than UPS: XPO (73.20) vs UPS (18.57). XPO YTD gains are higher at: 56.729 vs. UPS (19.319). UPS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 11.6B vs. XPO (1.22B). UPS has more cash in the bank: 5.8B vs. XPO (237M). XPO has less debt than UPS: XPO (4.03B) vs UPS (28.7B). UPS has higher revenues than XPO: UPS (88.3B) vs XPO (8.3B).
UPSXPOUPS / XPO
Capitalization97.6B25B390%
EBITDA11.6B1.22B955%
Gain YTD19.31956.72934%
P/E Ratio18.5773.2025%
Revenue88.3B8.3B1,064%
Total Cash5.8B237M2,448%
Total Debt28.7B4.03B712%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
UPS vs XPO: Fundamental Ratings
UPS
XPO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2570
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10017
SMR RATING
1..100
3146
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2640
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2914
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UPS's Valuation (7) in the Air Freight Or Couriers industry is significantly better than the same rating for XPO (87) in the Trucking industry. This means that UPS’s stock grew significantly faster than XPO’s over the last 12 months.

XPO's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Trucking industry is significantly better than the same rating for UPS (100) in the Air Freight Or Couriers industry. This means that XPO’s stock grew significantly faster than UPS’s over the last 12 months.

UPS's SMR Rating (31) in the Air Freight Or Couriers industry is in the same range as XPO (46) in the Trucking industry. This means that UPS’s stock grew similarly to XPO’s over the last 12 months.

UPS's Price Growth Rating (26) in the Air Freight Or Couriers industry is in the same range as XPO (40) in the Trucking industry. This means that UPS’s stock grew similarly to XPO’s over the last 12 months.

XPO's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Trucking industry is in the same range as UPS (29) in the Air Freight Or Couriers industry. This means that XPO’s stock grew similarly to UPS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
UPSXPO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
UPS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XPO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CENN3.430.02
+0.59%
Cenntro Inc.
TS57.670.31
+0.54%
Tenaris S A
LION13.34-0.06
-0.45%
Lionsgate Studios Corp
YALA5.18-0.03
-0.58%
Yalla Group Limited
EGG5.10-1.30
-20.31%
Enigmatig Ltd

UPS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UPS has been closely correlated with FDX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UPS jumps, then FDX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UPS
1D Price
Change %
UPS100%
+0.60%
FDX - UPS
70%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
XPO - UPS
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
GXO - UPS
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
RLGT - UPS
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
FWRD - UPS
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.49%
More

XPO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XPO has been closely correlated with FWRD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XPO jumps, then FWRD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XPO
1D Price
Change %
XPO100%
-0.54%
FWRD - XPO
75%
Closely correlated
-1.49%
ODFL - XPO
72%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
GXO - XPO
71%
Closely correlated
+0.27%
HUBG - XPO
70%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
JBHT - XPO
68%
Closely correlated
-0.37%
More