Advertisement
APO or BAM or OWL
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Apollo Global Management (APO) vs. Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) vs. Blue Owl Capital (OWL) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- APO, BAM, and OWL operate in the alternative asset management sector, with varying scales of assets under management (AUM) and recent price movements tied to broader market sentiment on private markets.
- APO has shown resilience with positive year-to-date returns amid upcoming earnings, while BAM has faced sector-wide pressures on alternatives amid fiscal and policy uncertainties.
- OWL reported solid Q2 2026 AUM growth to $319 billion and strong distributable earnings, contributing to its outperformance relative to peers in recent market activity.
- All three stocks exhibit sensitivity to interest rates, fundraising trends, and investor appetite for alternatives, with differences in business diversification and capital deployment strategies.
- Relative performance highlights trade-offs between established scale (BAM), growth momentum (OWL), and earnings visibility (APO) in the current environment.
Introduction
APO, BAM, and OWL represent prominent players in the alternative asset management industry, offering exposure to private credit, real assets, and related strategies. This comparison examines their recent performance, business models, and market positioning to assist institutional and individual investors evaluating relative value and sector dynamics. Traders and portfolio managers focused on alternatives may find the analysis useful for assessing diversification opportunities amid evolving macroeconomic conditions.
APO Overview and Recent Performance
Apollo Global Management (APO) manages a diversified portfolio of credit, private equity, and real assets. In recent weeks, the stock has traded with upward momentum, closing at approximately $125.59 on July 31, 2026, supported by analyst expectations for earnings growth. Recent market activity reflects investor focus on the firm's upcoming Q2 2026 results, scheduled for early August, alongside broader resilience in alternative strategies despite sector volatility.
BAM Overview and Recent Performance
Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) focuses on infrastructure, real estate, and renewable energy investments through its global platform. The stock has experienced mixed performance in recent market activity, closing around $48.40 on July 31, 2026, with year-to-date returns reflecting pressures on alternative asset managers. Sentiment has been influenced by concerns over private credit markets and policy uncertainties, contributing to relative underperformance versus broader indices in the period.
OWL Overview and Recent Performance
Blue Owl Capital (OWL) specializes in private credit and GP strategic capital, with a growing presence in real assets. Recent developments include Q2 2026 results showing AUM reaching $319 billion and distributable earnings growth, supporting positive stock movement to around $10.30 as of July 31, 2026. Year-to-date gains have outpaced some peers, driven by consistent fundraising and investment performance across platforms.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots optimized for prevailing market conditions. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers, yet only the strongest performers with suitable strategies earn placement in this section. Available bots span diverse trading styles, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker sets, with many demonstrating win rates in the 60-80% range or annual returns varying widely by strategy. Review the platform to identify bots aligned with specific risk profiles and market views.
Head-to-Head Comparison
APO, BAM, and OWL differ in scale and focus: APO emphasizes credit and opportunistic equity, BAM leverages infrastructure and real assets with global reach, while OWL concentrates on private credit with permanent capital anchors. Recent momentum favors OWL due to AUM expansion and earnings beats, contrasting with BAM’s sensitivity to sector headwinds and APO’s positioning ahead of earnings catalysts. Valuation metrics reflect varying growth trajectories, with all exposed to AUM flows and fee income tied to alternative strategies. Risk factors include interest rate sensitivity and fundraising cycles, creating trade-offs between stability at larger scales and agility in specialized platforms.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable trend consistency, earnings visibility, and relative positioning in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to OWL for its demonstrated AUM growth and sector resilience, followed by APO ahead of earnings, with BAM showing more tempered momentum amid broader pressures.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBAM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and OWL’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
- APO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- BAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- OWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BAM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and OWL’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- APO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
- BAM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- OWL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
APO (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.47% price change this week, while BAM (@Investment Managers) price change was +8.45% , and OWL (@Investment Managers) price fluctuated +15.24% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +5.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.28%.
Reported Earning Dates
APO is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
OWL is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (+5.92% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| APO | BAM | OWL | |
| Capitalization | 73.4B | 83.4B | 18.5B |
| EBITDA | 7.72B | 3.46B | 941M |
| Gain YTD | -11.233 | 2.284 | -17.067 |
| P/E Ratio | 45.35 | 30.17 | 98.92 |
| Revenue | 31.5B | 4.77B | 2.99B |
| Total Cash | 253B | 1.1B | 169M |
| Total Debt | 14.2B | 3.83B | 4.35B |
APO | BAM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 39 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | 65 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 91 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 32 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | 81 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BAM's Valuation (65) in the null industry is in the same range as APO (72) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to APO’s over the last 12 months.
APO's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAM (91) in the null industry. This means that APO’s stock grew somewhat faster than BAM’s over the last 12 months.
BAM's SMR Rating (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APO (92) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than APO’s over the last 12 months.
BAM's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as APO (55) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to APO’s over the last 12 months.
APO's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for BAM (81) in the null industry. This means that APO’s stock grew significantly faster than BAM’s over the last 12 months.
| APO | BAM | OWL | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 57% | 5 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 73% | 5 days ago 59% | 6 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 18 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 63% |
Advertisement
APO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APO has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APO jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.
OWL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OWL has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OWL jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.