ARES
Price
$129.34
Change
+$0.99 (+0.77%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
29.17B
39 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KKR
Price
$97.01
Change
-$0.16 (-0.16%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
87.1B
43 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OWL
Price
$9.53
Change
+$0.04 (+0.42%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
6.44B
38 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ARES or KKR or OWL

ARES vs KKR vs OWL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Ares Management Corporation (ARES) vs. KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) vs. Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • ARES, KKR, and OWL—leading alternative asset managers—have faced sector-wide pressure from private credit redemption fears and liquidity concerns in recent weeks.
  • KKR demonstrates relative resilience, with its market cap rising about 12% over the past 30 days amid strategic investments and AUM growth.
  • OWL has underperformed peers, declining sharply due to fund-specific redemption restrictions that rippled across the industry.
  • ARES maintains steady fee-earning AUM at around $385 billion, supported by deal activity despite broader drawdowns from 52-week highs.
  • All three stocks trade at elevated P/E ratios (ARES 66x, KKR 43x, OWL 89x) with attractive dividend yields, particularly OWL at over 10%.
  • Upcoming Q1 earnings reports could shift sentiment, with analysts viewing the group as undervalued post-selloff.

Introduction

Alternative asset managers like ARES, KKR, and OWL dominate private credit and related strategies, managing hundreds of billions in assets under management (AUM). This stock comparison evaluates their relative performance amid recent market turbulence, including private credit redemption pressures and sector drawdowns. Traders seeking momentum plays and long-term investors eyeing high yields or beaten-down valuations will find insights into business models, recent price behavior, and positioning. With earnings season approaching, understanding contrasts in scale, growth, and risk exposure aids informed decision-making in this volatile niche.

ARES Overview and Recent Performance

Ares Management Corporation (ARES) is a global alternative investment manager specializing in credit, private equity, real estate, and infrastructure, with approximately $623 billion in total AUM, including $385 billion in fee-earning AUM. In recent market activity, ARES shares have traded around $112, down significantly from 52-week highs near $195 amid broader alternative asset sector weakness. Private credit concerns, including fund liquidity issues at peers, weighed on sentiment, though deal announcements like financing for acquisitions provided some support. Upcoming Q1 earnings on May 1 are anticipated to highlight AUM growth and fee stability, with a 4.8% dividend yield attracting income-focused holders. Analyst targets average $144, signaling potential upside.

KKR Overview and Recent Performance

KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) operates as a leading investment firm across private equity, credit, and real assets, boasting $744 billion in total AUM and $604 billion in fee-earning AUM. Shares recently hovered near $101, rebounding about 19% over the past month from support levels around $90, outperforming peers amid sector stress. Factors include a $1.5 billion equity investment in Vertical Bridge and robust fundraising, such as a $23 billion private equity fund close. Private credit fears contributed to volatility, but KKR's scale and diversification have buffered impacts. With Q1 earnings due May 5 and a modest 0.7% yield, focus remains on growth metrics; analysts rate it overweight with $123 targets.

OWL Overview and Recent Performance

Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) focuses on direct lending, GP stakes, and real assets, managing over $307 billion in total AUM, with $188 billion fee-earning. Trading around $9, shares have declined sharply from 52-week highs above $21, exacerbated by redemption gates in a flagship credit fund that triggered industry-wide selling. Recent weeks saw heightened volume and downside pressure, though a 10% dividend yield offers cushion. Q1 results on April 30 are key, with management emphasizing AUM milestones crossed late last year. Analysts maintain outperform ratings, targeting $13.4 on average, viewing dips as overdone.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of top-performing AI trading bots from its library of hundreds that analyze and trade thousands of tickers across various markets. These bots employ diverse strategies—from swing trading to pattern recognition—tailored to current conditions like volatility in alternative assets. Highlighted performers often display win rates between 55% and 85%, profit factors exceeding 1.5, and thousands of backtested trades over timeframes spanning intraday to multi-month holds. Updated dynamically, the section spotlights bots with consistent edges in momentum, mean reversion, and sector rotations. Investors can explore and deploy these for automated trading insights relevant to stocks like ARES, KKR, and OWL.

Head-to-Head Comparison

ARES, KKR, and OWL share business models centered on fee-based alternative investments, with heavy private credit exposure driving growth via fundraising but heightening liquidity risks. KKR leads in scale ($744B AUM) and recent momentum, contrasting OWL's smaller size ($307B) and fund-specific vulnerabilities. ARES balances with diversified strategies and stable fees. Valuation sensitivity is high across the board, with elevated P/Es reflecting growth premiums amid drawdowns up to 42% from peaks. Sector headwinds like redemptions contrast trade-offs: KKR's rebound signals stronger sentiment, while OWL's yield compensates for volatility; ARES offers middle-ground positioning.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward KKR based on trend consistency, recent 19% monthly gains, superior AUM scale, and relative market cap expansion amid peer pressures. Its rebound and fundraising catalysts position it favorably for earnings-driven recovery, though private credit risks persist probabilistically lower given diversification.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 22, 2026
Stock price -- (ARES: $129.34KKR: $97.01OWL: $9.53)
Brand notoriety: ARES, KKR and OWL are all not notable
The three companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARES: 162%, KKR: 119%, OWL: 94%
Market capitalization -- ARES: $29.17B, KKR: $87.1B, OWL: $6.44B
$ARES is valued at $29.17B, while KKR has a market capitalization of $87.1B, and OWL's market capitalization is $6.44B. The market cap for tickers in this @Investment Managers ranges from $163.01B to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Investment Managers industry is $9.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARES’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKKR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and OWL’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ARES’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KKR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ARES is a better buy in the long-term than OWL, which in turn is a better option than KKR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ARES’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KKR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and OWL’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ARES’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • KKR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OWL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ARES, KKR and OWL are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ARES (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.64% price change this week, while KKR (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.79% , and OWL (@Investment Managers) price fluctuated -1.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

ARES is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.

KKR is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

OWL is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KKR($87.1B) has a higher market cap than ARES($29.2B) and OWL($6.44B). OWL has higher P/E ratio than ARES and KKR: OWL (79.42) vs ARES (59.60) and KKR (33.00). ARES YTD gains are higher at: -18.071 vs. KKR (-23.614) and OWL (-33.416). KKR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.89B vs. ARES (2.23B) and OWL (951M). OWL has less debt than ARES and KKR: OWL (4.36B) vs ARES (14.1B) and KKR (54.6B). KKR has higher revenues than ARES and OWL: KKR (20.4B) vs ARES (5.91B) and OWL (2.94B).
ARESKKROWL
Capitalization29.2B87.1B6.44B
EBITDA2.23B9.89B951M
Gain YTD-18.071-23.614-33.416
P/E Ratio59.6033.0079.42
Revenue5.91B20.4B2.94B
Total CashN/A132B190M
Total Debt14.1B54.6B4.36B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ARES vs KKR: Fundamental Ratings
ARES
KKR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5268
SMR RATING
1..100
9770
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5260
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8887
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3685

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ARES's Valuation (14) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KKR (79). This means that ARES’s stock grew somewhat faster than KKR’s over the last 12 months.

ARES's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as KKR (68). This means that ARES’s stock grew similarly to KKR’s over the last 12 months.

KKR's SMR Rating (70) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as ARES (97). This means that KKR’s stock grew similarly to ARES’s over the last 12 months.

ARES's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as KKR (60). This means that ARES’s stock grew similarly to KKR’s over the last 12 months.

KKR's P/E Growth Rating (87) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as ARES (88). This means that KKR’s stock grew similarly to ARES’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARESKKROWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ARES
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KKR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OWL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NODE46.911.33
+2.93%
VanEck Onchain Economy ETF
CEFD19.090.18
+0.94%
ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5X Lvgd CE Fd ETN
VTHO.X0.000385-0.000008
-2.09%
VeThor Token cryptocurrency
JASMY.X0.004587-0.000109
-2.32%
JasmyCoin cryptocurrency
QKC.X0.002106-0.000119
-5.36%
QuarkChain cryptocurrency

KKR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KKR has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KKR jumps, then BX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KKR
1D Price
Change %
KKR100%
-0.16%
BX - KKR
84%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
ARES - KKR
82%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
APO - KKR
80%
Closely correlated
-1.02%
TPG - KKR
78%
Closely correlated
-1.20%
CG - KKR
76%
Closely correlated
-1.95%
More

OWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OWL has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OWL jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OWL
1D Price
Change %
OWL100%
+0.42%
ARES - OWL
78%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
BX - OWL
73%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
TPG - OWL
73%
Closely correlated
-1.20%
KKR - OWL
71%
Closely correlated
-0.16%
APO - OWL
71%
Closely correlated
-1.02%
More