Alternative asset managers like ARES, KKR, and OWL dominate private credit and related strategies, managing hundreds of billions in assets under management (AUM). This stock comparison evaluates their relative performance amid recent market turbulence, including private credit redemption pressures and sector drawdowns. Traders seeking momentum plays and long-term investors eyeing high yields or beaten-down valuations will find insights into business models, recent price behavior, and positioning. With earnings season approaching, understanding contrasts in scale, growth, and risk exposure aids informed decision-making in this volatile niche.
Ares Management Corporation (ARES) is a global alternative investment manager specializing in credit, private equity, real estate, and infrastructure, with approximately $623 billion in total AUM, including $385 billion in fee-earning AUM. In recent market activity, ARES shares have traded around $112, down significantly from 52-week highs near $195 amid broader alternative asset sector weakness. Private credit concerns, including fund liquidity issues at peers, weighed on sentiment, though deal announcements like financing for acquisitions provided some support. Upcoming Q1 earnings on May 1 are anticipated to highlight AUM growth and fee stability, with a 4.8% dividend yield attracting income-focused holders. Analyst targets average $144, signaling potential upside.
KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) operates as a leading investment firm across private equity, credit, and real assets, boasting $744 billion in total AUM and $604 billion in fee-earning AUM. Shares recently hovered near $101, rebounding about 19% over the past month from support levels around $90, outperforming peers amid sector stress. Factors include a $1.5 billion equity investment in Vertical Bridge and robust fundraising, such as a $23 billion private equity fund close. Private credit fears contributed to volatility, but KKR's scale and diversification have buffered impacts. With Q1 earnings due May 5 and a modest 0.7% yield, focus remains on growth metrics; analysts rate it overweight with $123 targets.
Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) focuses on direct lending, GP stakes, and real assets, managing over $307 billion in total AUM, with $188 billion fee-earning. Trading around $9, shares have declined sharply from 52-week highs above $21, exacerbated by redemption gates in a flagship credit fund that triggered industry-wide selling. Recent weeks saw heightened volume and downside pressure, though a 10% dividend yield offers cushion. Q1 results on April 30 are key, with management emphasizing AUM milestones crossed late last year. Analysts maintain outperform ratings, targeting $13.4 on average, viewing dips as overdone.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of top-performing AI trading bots from its library of hundreds that analyze and trade thousands of tickers across various markets. These bots employ diverse strategies—from swing trading to pattern recognition—tailored to current conditions like volatility in alternative assets. Highlighted performers often display win rates between 55% and 85%, profit factors exceeding 1.5, and thousands of backtested trades over timeframes spanning intraday to multi-month holds. Updated dynamically, the section spotlights bots with consistent edges in momentum, mean reversion, and sector rotations. Investors can explore and deploy these for automated trading insights relevant to stocks like ARES, KKR, and OWL.
ARES, KKR, and OWL share business models centered on fee-based alternative investments, with heavy private credit exposure driving growth via fundraising but heightening liquidity risks. KKR leads in scale ($744B AUM) and recent momentum, contrasting OWL's smaller size ($307B) and fund-specific vulnerabilities. ARES balances with diversified strategies and stable fees. Valuation sensitivity is high across the board, with elevated P/Es reflecting growth premiums amid drawdowns up to 42% from peaks. Sector headwinds like redemptions contrast trade-offs: KKR's rebound signals stronger sentiment, while OWL's yield compensates for volatility; ARES offers middle-ground positioning.
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward KKR based on trend consistency, recent 19% monthly gains, superior AUM scale, and relative market cap expansion amid peer pressures. Its rebound and fundraising catalysts position it favorably for earnings-driven recovery, though private credit risks persist probabilistically lower given diversification.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ARES’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKKR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and OWL’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ARES’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KKR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and OWL’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
ARES (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.64% price change this week, while KKR (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.79% , and OWL (@Investment Managers) price fluctuated -1.95% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.94%.
ARES is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
KKR is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
OWL is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| ARES | KKR | OWL | |
| Capitalization | 29.2B | 87.1B | 6.44B |
| EBITDA | 2.23B | 9.89B | 951M |
| Gain YTD | -18.071 | -23.614 | -33.416 |
| P/E Ratio | 59.60 | 33.00 | 79.42 |
| Revenue | 5.91B | 20.4B | 2.94B |
| Total Cash | N/A | 132B | 190M |
| Total Debt | 14.1B | 54.6B | 4.36B |
ARES | KKR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 52 | 68 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 70 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 87 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 36 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ARES's Valuation (14) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KKR (79). This means that ARES’s stock grew somewhat faster than KKR’s over the last 12 months.
ARES's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as KKR (68). This means that ARES’s stock grew similarly to KKR’s over the last 12 months.
KKR's SMR Rating (70) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as ARES (97). This means that KKR’s stock grew similarly to ARES’s over the last 12 months.
ARES's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as KKR (60). This means that ARES’s stock grew similarly to KKR’s over the last 12 months.
KKR's P/E Growth Rating (87) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as ARES (88). This means that KKR’s stock grew similarly to ARES’s over the last 12 months.
| ARES | KKR | OWL | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 72% | 21 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 67% | 7 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 74% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 73% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NODE | 46.91 | 1.33 | +2.93% |
| VanEck Onchain Economy ETF | |||
| CEFD | 19.09 | 0.18 | +0.94% |
| ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5X Lvgd CE Fd ETN | |||
| VTHO.X | 0.000385 | -0.000008 | -2.09% |
| VeThor Token cryptocurrency | |||
| JASMY.X | 0.004587 | -0.000109 | -2.32% |
| JasmyCoin cryptocurrency | |||
| QKC.X | 0.002106 | -0.000119 | -5.36% |
| QuarkChain cryptocurrency | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KKR has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KKR jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OWL has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OWL jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.