This comparison examines three industrial stocks—ATMU, CSW, and GGG—to provide traders and investors with an objective view of their positioning in the current market environment. The analysis focuses on business contexts, recent performance patterns, and key contrasts that may appeal to those evaluating relative opportunities within the industrials space. Professional and retail investors seeking data-driven insights into sector peers may find the review relevant for portfolio considerations or tactical positioning.
Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. designs, manufactures, and sells filtration products, primarily under the Fleetguard brand, serving on- and off-highway applications. In recent weeks, the stock has reflected market responses to quarterly results and corporate actions. The company reported first-quarter results with sales growth and maintained its full-year outlook, while completing an acquisition and announcing a supply chain leadership appointment. Capital return activities, including share repurchases, have also featured in recent disclosures. These elements have contributed to sentiment around operational execution amid broader industrial demand patterns.
CSW Industrials, Inc. operates as a diversified industrial company with segments including contractor solutions, engineered building solutions, and specialized reliability solutions. Recent market activity has incorporated updates on dividend adjustments, share repurchases, and segment investments. The company announced an upcoming earnings release and executive promotions tied to growth strategy. Performance has been shaped by these capital allocation moves and end-market dynamics in recent periods, with analysts monitoring results for indications of margin trends and acquisition synergies.
Graco Inc. designs, manufactures, and markets equipment and systems for fluid and powder management across industrial and commercial applications. In recent weeks, the stock has aligned with broader machinery sector movements influenced by industrial production data and demand signals. The company’s established market position in fluid handling has provided context for performance amid economic indicators. No singular dominant catalyst has emerged in the immediate period, leaving relative positioning driven by ongoing operational metrics and sector comparisons.
Trending AI Robots on Tickeron showcases a curated selection from hundreds of AI trading bots that analyze and trade thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating strong alignment with prevailing market conditions earn placement in this section. Available bots span a wide range of performance metrics, with historical win rates often falling between 55% and 75% depending on strategy, alongside varying profit factors, maximum drawdowns, and trade frequencies. Each bot employs distinct styles, timeframes, and ticker sets, allowing users to explore options suited to different risk tolerances and objectives. Review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed statistics.
ATMU centers on filtration solutions with recent emphasis on acquisition integration and supply chain optimization, offering exposure to transportation and industrial end markets. CSW provides broader industrial product diversification across three segments, supported by active dividend growth and buyback programs that may appeal to income-oriented strategies. GGG focuses on specialized fluid handling equipment, benefiting from established global distribution but showing sensitivity to cyclical industrial spending. Valuation multiples and momentum indicators have differed, with each stock exhibiting distinct responses to earnings beats or misses and macroeconomic releases. Risk considerations include supply chain variables for ATMU, integration outcomes for CSW, and demand cyclicality for GGG. Sector exposure remains overlapping yet differentiated by product specificity and customer bases.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in recent market activity, stability of reported metrics, and positioning relative to sector catalysts, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a probabilistic edge to CSW. This assessment reflects the company’s demonstrated capital return activity and segment expansion signals amid a period of mixed industrial performance. Outcomes remain subject to evolving data and should be evaluated alongside individual risk parameters.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ATMU’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCSW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and GGG’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ATMU’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CSW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and GGG’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
ATMU (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +2.05% price change this week, while CSW (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +1.82% , and GGG (@Industrial Machinery) price fluctuated -0.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -3.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.77%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -0.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.32%.
ATMU is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
CSW is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
GGG is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
@Industrial Machinery (-0.50% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| ATMU | CSW | GGG | |
| Capitalization | 3.94B | 4.48B | 12.3B |
| EBITDA | 344M | 235M | 744M |
| Gain YTD | -7.002 | -6.255 | -8.964 |
| P/E Ratio | 18.89 | 40.99 | 24.22 |
| Revenue | 1.83B | 1.08B | 2.25B |
| Total Cash | 210M | 33.8M | 712M |
| Total Debt | 1.06B | 945M | 52.9M |
CSW | GGG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 4 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 78 Overvalued | 25 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 93 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 70 | 46 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 72 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 71 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GGG's Valuation (25) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSW (78) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that GGG’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSW’s over the last 12 months.
CSW's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GGG (93) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that CSW’s stock grew somewhat faster than GGG’s over the last 12 months.
GGG's SMR Rating (46) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as CSW (70) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that GGG’s stock grew similarly to CSW’s over the last 12 months.
CSW's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as GGG (72) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that CSW’s stock grew similarly to GGG’s over the last 12 months.
CSW's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as GGG (71) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that CSW’s stock grew similarly to GGG’s over the last 12 months.
| ATMU | CSW | GGG | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A | 1 day ago 54% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 38% | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 55% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 45% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 69% | 7 days ago 49% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 54% | 7 days ago 58% | 11 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 52% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ATMU has been closely correlated with PH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ATMU jumps, then PH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ATMU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATMU | 100% | +1.52% | ||
| PH - ATMU | 73% Closely correlated | +3.06% | ||
| DOV - ATMU | 69% Closely correlated | +2.23% | ||
| ITT - ATMU | 68% Closely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| CMI - ATMU | 67% Closely correlated | +3.99% | ||
| DCI - ATMU | 67% Closely correlated | +2.19% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSW has been loosely correlated with DOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSW jumps, then DOV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSW | 100% | +3.33% | ||
| DOV - CSW | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.23% | ||
| ATMU - CSW | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.52% | ||
| NDSN - CSW | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.53% | ||
| GGG - CSW | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| RBC - CSW | 56% Loosely correlated | +5.33% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGG has been closely correlated with LECO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GGG jumps, then LECO could also see price increases.