Advertisement
BBUC or BN or OWL
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Brookfield Business Corporation (BBUC) vs. Brookfield Corporation (BN) vs. Blue Owl Capital (OWL) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Two of the three names share a parentage: BBUC and BN are both Brookfield entities but operate at very different levels of the capital structure and carry distinct risk profiles.
- BN offers the broadest diversification as a global alternative asset manager, with record distributable earnings, rising fee-bearing capital, and a multi-year structural-simplification catalyst.
- BBUC is a concentrated owner of industrial and business-services assets, actively monetizing holdings and buying back shares at what management describes as a steep discount to net asset value.
- OWL is the most volatile of the three, pressured by private-credit redemption requests and specific credit events, despite continued growth in assets under management (AUM, the total value of assets the firm manages for clients).
- Relative performance and market positioning have diverged sharply, making this a study in diversification versus concentration versus credit-cycle sensitivity.
Introduction
Investors comparing BBUC, BN, and OWL are effectively weighing three different ways to gain exposure to alternative assets and operating businesses. Two of these tickers sit within the Brookfield ecosystem, while the third is an independent alternative asset manager focused on private credit, real assets, and capital solutions. This stock comparison is relevant for traders assessing relative performance and for longer-term investors evaluating sector exposure, growth drivers, and valuation sensitivity across contrasting business models. Recent market activity has highlighted how differently each responds to shifts in credit conditions, interest rates, and investor sentiment.
BBUC Overview and Recent Performance
BBUC, Brookfield Business Corporation, is a global owner and operator of industrial and business-services companies and serves as the flagship listed vehicle of Brookfield Asset Management's Private Equity Group. In recent weeks the shares have traded near the lower end of their 52-week range after a period of choppy price action, reflecting investor reassessment of valuation and the company's capital-recycling timeline.
Recent developments have centered on monetization and simplification. The company completed a corporate reorganization in March 2026 to improve liquidity and index demand for its shares. It has also advanced capital-recycling initiatives, generating more than $1.2 billion in proceeds from asset sales and distributions in the first half of the year, including an agreement to sell its Multiplex construction business. Management has paired these proceeds with an active share-buyback program, citing repurchases at a significant discount to net asset value. A notable catalyst has been its $500 million commitment to an OpenAI-linked AI deployment platform, positioning the firm around enterprise AI adoption across its operating companies.
BN Overview and Recent Performance
BN, Brookfield Corporation, is a diversified global alternative asset manager and investor spanning asset management, wealth solutions, and operating businesses across infrastructure, renewable power, real estate, and private equity. Recent stock behavior has been comparatively steadier, with shares trading in the middle of their range and, in recent weeks, reclaiming levels above key longer-term moving averages.
The company has posted record distributable earnings before realizations, driven by strong fundraising that lifted fee-bearing capital beyond $600 billion. Sentiment has been supported by a multi-year structural-simplification effort, including shareholder approval to combine Brookfield Corporation with Brookfield Wealth Solutions and the completed acquisition of credit manager Oaktree. Management has guided toward 20%-plus annual distributable-earnings growth, underpinned by AI-infrastructure investments. A three-for-two stock split and a 17% dividend increase have further shaped the stock's market positioning, while the analyst consensus skews toward Buy ratings.
OWL Overview and Recent Performance
OWL, Blue Owl Capital, is an alternative asset manager organized across three platforms: Credit, Real Assets, and GP Strategic Capital. Its stock has experienced the sharpest drawdown of the three, declining materially over the past year and trading well below its 52-week high, even as total AUM has continued to grow, reaching roughly $319 billion.
Sentiment has been pressured by elevated redemption requests at certain non-traded private-credit funds, which led the firm to maintain quarterly withdrawal caps, and by specific credit events including a potential loss on a junior loan and a force-majeure notice tied to a large data-center project. These concerns have been partially offset by solid fee-related earnings growth and strong fundraising across platforms. The shares now carry a notably high dividend yield, which has drawn both income-seeking interest and questions about payout sustainability given the gap between the quarterly dividend and recent distributable earnings.
Trending AI Robots
For traders seeking a data-driven approach to names like these, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of automated strategies. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers, yet only the strongest performers suited to current market conditions earn a place in this featured section. The robots vary widely in trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance statistics, and the specific set of tickers they follow, giving users the ability to align automation with their own risk tolerance and horizon. Browsing the curated list can help identify which strategies are currently showing the most consistent trend-following or momentum characteristics. Explore the Trending AI Robots section to see which approaches are leading today.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The clearest contrast is between concentration and diversification. BN spreads exposure across asset management, insurance, and operating businesses, giving it a steadier earnings profile and multiple growth levers. BBUC is more concentrated in industrial and business-services holdings, making its stock more sensitive to execution on asset sales and the discount to net asset value at which it trades. OWL is concentrated in private credit and real assets, leaving it most exposed to credit-cycle risk and redemption sentiment.
Growth drivers also differ. BN benefits from fundraising scale and AI-infrastructure demand; BBUC from monetization and buybacks; OWL from AUM growth and fee-bearing capital deployment. On valuation sensitivity, BBUC screens inexpensive on sales-based measures but carries a leveraged balance sheet, while OWL trades at a high earnings multiple despite its price decline. Risk factors are most acute for OWL, which faces redemption pressure and specific credit events, whereas BN's principal risks are execution on its corporate combinations and broader market conditions.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable trend consistency, stability, and catalyst visibility, Tickeron's AI would most likely favor BN among the three. Its steadier relative performance, record distributable earnings, rising fee-bearing capital, and clearly defined structural-simplification catalysts present a more balanced risk-reward profile. BBUC shows value-oriented appeal but its near-term trend remains less established as the market weighs monetization timing. OWL carries the strongest yield but also the most pronounced downside momentum and credit-related uncertainty. This assessment is probabilistic rather than definitive and reflects current market positioning rather than a forward guarantee.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
BBUC's MACD Histogram crosses above signal line
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for BBUC turned positive on September 22, 2026. Looking at past instances where BBUC's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 34 of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where BBUC's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 20 of 29 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 07, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on BBUC as a result. In 52 of 79 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 66%.
Following a +2.51% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where BBUC advanced for three days, in 181 of 263 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 7 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where BBUC declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 73%.
BBUC broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 09, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for BBUC entered a downward trend on October 08, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 5 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 16 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.958) is normal, around the industry mean (5.977). P/E Ratio (6.881) is within average values for comparable stocks, (53.565). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (0.772). Dividend Yield (0.010) settles around the average of (0.019) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.079) is also within normal values, averaging (2.059).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 62 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. BBUC’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 91 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. BBUC’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 82, placing this stock worse than average.
BN in -2.97% downward trend, declining for three consecutive days on October 14, 2026
Moving lower for three straight days is viewed as a bearish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future declines. Considering data from situations where BN declined for three days, in 197 of 294 cases, the price declined further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 67%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 36 of 57 cases where BN's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 63%.
The Aroon Indicator for BN entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where BN's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 19 of 26 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 15, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on BN as a result. In 62 of 80 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 77%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for BN just turned positive on September 29, 2026. Looking at past instances where BN's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 27 of 47 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 57%.
Following a +1.26% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where BN advanced for three days, in 232 of 348 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
BN may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 57 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 82, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 73 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. BN’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 77 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.906) is normal, around the industry mean (3.246). BN has a moderately high P/E Ratio (67.167) as compared to the industry average of (27.022). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.110) is also within normal values, averaging (1.319). BN has a moderately low Dividend Yield (0.007) as compared to the industry average of (0.081). P/S Ratio (1.135) is also within normal values, averaging (15.798).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 88 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 95 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 95 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
OWL's Indicator enters downward trend
The Aroon Indicator for OWL entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor identified a pattern where the AroonDown red line was above 70 while the AroonUp green line was below 30 for three straight days. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. A.I.dvisor looked at 180 similar instances where the Aroon Indicator formed such a pattern. In 140 of the 180 cases the stock moved lower. This puts the odds of a downward move at 78%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 42 of 59 cases where OWL's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 71%.
OWL moved below its 50-day moving average on September 10, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for OWL crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 18, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 10 of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 62%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where OWL declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 71%.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where OWL's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 18 of 30 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 60%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 15, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on OWL as a result. In 57 of 79 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 72%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for OWL just turned positive on October 08, 2026. Looking at past instances where OWL's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 34 of 47 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 72%.
The 50-day moving average for OWL moved above the 200-day moving average on September 23, 2026. This could be a long-term bullish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an upward trend.
Following a +4.17% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where OWL advanced for three days, in 228 of 303 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 75%.
OWL may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 4 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (3.135) is normal, around the industry mean (3.246). OWL has a moderately high P/E Ratio (76.250) as compared to the industry average of (27.022). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.146) is also within normal values, averaging (1.319). Dividend Yield (0.100) settles around the average of (0.081) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.303) is also within normal values, averaging (15.798).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 75 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. OWL’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 86 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 92 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. OWL’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 82, placing this stock worse than average.
BN | OWL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 88 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 75 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OWL's Valuation (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BN (77) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that OWL’s stock grew significantly faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.
BN's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OWL (100) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew somewhat faster than OWL’s over the last 12 months.
OWL's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as BN (88) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that OWL’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.
BN's Price Growth Rating (73) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as OWL (75) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to OWL’s over the last 12 months.
OWL's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as BN (95) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that OWL’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.
| BBUC | BN | OWL | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 14 days ago 67% | 7 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 78% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BBUC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while BN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and OWL’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
- BBUC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- BN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- OWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BBUC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and OWL’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BBUC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- BN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- OWL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BBUC (@Industrial Conglomerates) experienced а +2.02% price change this week, while BN (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.11% , and OWL (@Investment Managers) price fluctuated -3.24% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was -3.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.20%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.73%.
Reported Earning Dates
BBUC is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
BN is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.
OWL is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Conglomerates (-3.50% weekly)Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).
@Investment Managers (-1.53% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GDXJ | 109.61 | 4.86 | +4.64% |
| VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) | |||
| IAPR | 33.45 | 0.18 | +0.53% |
| Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - April (IAPR) | |||
| MUYY | 17.68 | -0.02 | -0.09% |
| GraniteShares YieldBOOST MU ETF (MUYY) | |||
| ATMP | 34.65 | -0.51 | -1.45% |
| Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) | |||
| BEG | 35.60 | -0.89 | -2.44% |
| Leverage Shares 2x Long BE Daily ETF (BEG) | |||