Advertisement
BLK or BX or KKR
BLK vs BX vs KKR Stock Comparison: Stability vs Growth in Volatile Markets
Key Takeaways
- BLK demonstrates superior stability with flat YTD performance at +0.11%, contrasting BX's -14.77% and KKR's -20.20% amid recent sector pressures.
- All three firms manage trillions in assets, but BLK leads in diversified ETFs and crypto exposure, while BX and KKR focus on alternatives like AI infrastructure and private equity.
- Recent market activity shows BLK holding steady around $1,071, while BX trades near $130 and KKR at $102, reflecting pullbacks in private markets amid software selloffs.
- Valuations cluster at elevated P/E ratios—BLK at 30x, BX at 34x, KKR at 43x—highlighting growth expectations tempered by volatility risks.
- AI and infrastructure bets drive sentiment for BX and KKR, but BLK's scale provides resilience in shifting rate environments.
Introduction
BlackRock (BLK), Blackstone (BX), and KKR & Co. (KKR) represent pillars of the asset management industry, overseeing trillions in assets across ETFs, private equity, real estate, and alternatives. This BLK vs BX vs KKR stock comparison examines their relative performance and positioning amid recent market volatility, including software sector pressures and AI-driven shifts. Traders seeking momentum plays and long-term investors eyeing diversified exposure will find value in understanding how BLK's stability contrasts with BX and KKR's growth-oriented models in the current environment.
BLK Overview and Recent Performance
BlackRock (BLK), the world's largest asset manager with over $14 trillion in assets under management, dominates ETFs via its iShares platform and has expanded into cryptocurrencies through investments like Bitmine and Ethereum exposure. Recent market activity has seen BLK trade steadily around $1,071, with YTD gains of +0.11% and minimal monthly fluctuation of +0.09%, outperforming peers amid broader financial sector dips. Sentiment benefits from resilient ETF inflows and infrastructure plays, though regulatory scrutiny on ESG and climate strategies has introduced modest headwinds. BLK's P/E of 30x reflects its scale and predictable fee income, supporting stability in uncertain conditions.
BX Overview and Recent Performance
Blackstone (BX), a leader in alternative assets with $159B market cap, specializes in private equity, real estate, and credit, recently pivoting to AI infrastructure via $1.2B Neysa financing and expanded Anthropic stake. Shares have faced headwinds, declining YTD -14.77% to around $130, with sharp monthly drops tied to software selloffs impacting portfolio holdings. Despite Q4 earnings beats (EPS $1.75 vs. $1.52 expected), performance reflects real estate pressures and AI hype volatility. At 34x P/E, BX trades at a premium on growth prospects from deals like Urbaser acquisition, appealing to investors betting on private market rebounds.
KKR Overview and Recent Performance
KKR & Co. (KKR), with $94B market cap, focuses on private equity, real estate, and credit, raising record capital and acquiring Arctos for sports exposure while navigating Asia fund clawbacks. Stock has underperformed YTD -20.20% to $102 levels, with monthly declines amplified by ~7% software allocation amid AI disruption fears. Q4 results showed EPS $1.12 missing estimates slightly, but diversified earnings and 2026 deal optimism provide tailwinds. Trading at 43x P/E, KKR's valuation embeds high growth expectations, balanced against volatility from exits and sector exposures.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates top-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available, each trading thousands of tickers with diverse strategies like swing trading, scalping, and hedging across 5-, 15-, and 60-minute timeframes. These bots, powered by advanced machine learning, earn trending status by outperforming in current volatility—low, medium, or high—via real-time pattern recognition and backtested results. Standouts include semiconductors bots with up to +305% annualized returns, 79% win rates, and profit factors over 3.0; aerospace/defense agents at +122% annualized, 74% wins; and infrastructure plays exceeding 70% returns with 73%+ win rates. Shorter-term models shine in volatile tech, posting 124% gains in defense and 215% in leveraged GOOGL plays, while hedging bots mitigate downside. Visit Trending AI Robots to explore bots suited to today's market dynamics.
Head-to-Head Comparison
BLK's ETF-centric model offers lower volatility and steady fees versus BX and KKR's alternative-heavy approaches, which amplify growth but heighten sensitivity to private exits and rates. Recent momentum favors BLK's flat YTD amid peers' double-digit declines, driven by software/AI fears hitting BX/KKR portfolios. Growth drivers diverge: BLK via crypto/ETFs, BX in AI infra, KKR in sports/secondaries. Risk factors include BLK's ESG backlash, BX/KKR's real estate exposure. Sector tilt shows BLK broader, peers private-focused. Valuations reflect BLK's stability premium, with BX/KKR higher multiples betting on realizations. Sentiment leans BLK resilient, peers poised for rebound on deal flow.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI favors BLK currently due to trend consistency, lower drawdowns, and relative stability amid volatility, positioning it ahead of BX and KKR's sharper corrections. Probabilistic edge stems from BLK's catalysts like ETF inflows outweighing peers' software risks, though BX/KKR could rotate higher on private market catalysts.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BLK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBX’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and KKR’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
- BLK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- BX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- KKR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BLK’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BX’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and KKR’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BLK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- BX’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- KKR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BLK (@Investment Managers) experienced а +3.30% price change this week, while BX (@Investment Managers) price change was +2.41% , and KKR (@Investment Managers) price fluctuated +1.79% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.26%.
Reported Earning Dates
BLK is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2026.
BX is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2026.
KKR is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (-2.23% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| BLK | BX | KKR | |
| Capitalization | 163B | 151B | 87B |
| EBITDA | 10.6B | N/A | 9.89B |
| Gain YTD | -0.790 | -18.004 | -23.614 |
| P/E Ratio | 26.43 | 31.74 | 32.96 |
| Revenue | 25.6B | 12.6B | 20.4B |
| Total Cash | 13.1B | N/A | 132B |
| Total Debt | 15B | 14.2B | 54.6B |
BLK | BX | KKR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | 16 Undervalued | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 68 | 68 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 66 | 28 | 70 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 52 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 75 | 87 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 31 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BX's Valuation (16) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLK (72) and is somewhat better than the same rating for KKR (79). This means that BX's stock grew somewhat faster than BLK’s and somewhat faster than KKR’s over the last 12 months.
BLK's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BX (68) and is in the same range as KKR (68). This means that BLK's stock grew similarly to BX’s and similarly to KKR’s over the last 12 months.
BX's SMR Rating (28) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLK (66) and is somewhat better than the same rating for KKR (70). This means that BX's stock grew somewhat faster than BLK’s and somewhat faster than KKR’s over the last 12 months.
BLK's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BX (52) and is in the same range as KKR (60). This means that BLK's stock grew similarly to BX’s and similarly to KKR’s over the last 12 months.
BLK's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BX (75) and is somewhat better than the same rating for KKR (87). This means that BLK's stock grew somewhat faster than BX’s and somewhat faster than KKR’s over the last 12 months.
| BLK | BX | KKR | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 50% | 5 days ago 59% | 5 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 66% | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 58% | 5 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 64% | 5 days ago 71% | 5 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 57% | 5 days ago 66% | 5 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 59% | 7 days ago 71% | 7 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 57% | 5 days ago 68% | 5 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 76% | 5 days ago 54% | 5 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 49% | 5 days ago 64% | 5 days ago 67% |
Advertisement
BX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BX has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BX jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.