Few names command as much attention in global asset management as BLK, BX, and KKR. BlackRock dominates the traditional and ETF landscape; Blackstone leads the alternative-asset universe; and KKR has carved out a distinct niche blending private equity, credit, and insurance. This stock comparison examines how these three publicly traded firms stack up in the current market environment, analyzing recent performance, fundamental drivers, and the structural forces shaping their trajectories. Whether you are a long-term investor evaluating relative positioning or an active trader assessing momentum, understanding the trade-offs among these three tickers is essential to navigating the evolving financial sector.
BlackRock, the world's largest asset manager, has continued to expand its dominance, reporting AUM of approximately $12.5 trillion as of mid-2025 — an 18% increase year-over-year. In its most recent quarterly results, the firm posted revenue of $5.42 billion and adjusted earnings per share that exceeded consensus estimates, driven by organic base fee growth, technology services revenue, and contributions from the Global Infrastructure Partners (GIP) transaction. However, the stock experienced notable pressure after the earnings release, as investors reacted to a $52 billion partial redemption from a single institutional client in a lower-fee index product, which dampened net long-term inflows by nearly 10% year-over-year.
The recent completion of the HPS Investment Partners acquisition, which added roughly $165 billion in client AUM, signals BlackRock's deliberate push into private credit and alternative strategies — a strategic evolution aimed at diversifying beyond its traditional index and ETF roots. Meanwhile, iShares ETFs recorded a record first half for flows, and technology services annual contract value (ACV) growth reached 16%. The stock's valuation, with a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple in the low-20s and a dividend yield near 2%, reflects the market's perception of BLK as a high-quality compounder, albeit one sensitive to institutional flow dynamics and performance-fee variability in private markets.
Blackstone stands as the largest alternative asset manager in the world, with AUM surpassing $1.2 trillion in Q2 2025 following a 13% year-over-year increase. The firm reported fee-related earnings (FRE) of $1.5 billion, or $1.19 per share — a 31% year-over-year surge — alongside distributable earnings of $1.6 billion. Both figures handily exceeded analyst expectations, and the stock rallied on the results. Total quarterly inflows reached $52.1 billion, with deployment of $33.1 billion and realizations of $23.4 billion, underscoring the firm's capacity to put capital to work and return proceeds to limited partners across market cycles.
Blackstone's diversified platform spans private equity, real estate, credit and insurance, and infrastructure, with perpetual capital AUM reaching $484.6 billion — a key structural advantage that provides more predictable, long-duration fee streams. The firm's Private Equity Asia flagship fund has raised $8 billion to date, and management has pointed to the strongest forward IPO (initial public offering) pipeline in four years, suggesting a favorable environment for monetizations ahead. With $181.2 billion in dry powder — uncommitted capital available for investment — and a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share, BX has demonstrated both growth and shareholder-return discipline. The stock, however, carries a higher beta and valuation sensitivity to deal-making activity and capital markets conditions, making it more cyclical than traditional asset managers.
KKR reported second-quarter 2025 results that showcased robust fee-related earnings growth of 17% year-over-year, reaching $887 million, while total operating earnings rose 14% to $1.2 billion. AUM climbed 14% to $686 billion, and fee-paying AUM expanded to $556 billion, reflecting sustained fundraising momentum — $28 billion in new capital was raised during the quarter alone. The firm's adjusted net income per share of $1.18 beat consensus estimates, yet the stock declined modestly following the release, as investors weighed GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) net income compression and broader market caution toward the alternative-asset sector.
A defining feature of KKR's model is its insurance platform, anchored by Global Atlantic, which now represents approximately one-third of the firm's AUM. Perpetual capital, which includes insurance-linked and retail-oriented K-Series vehicles, reached $289 billion, or 42% of total AUM — providing a more durable, annuity-like revenue base. KKR has also been active in asset-based finance (ABF), an area the firm identifies as a $6 trillion addressable market. Post-quarter, KKR closed its majority-stake acquisition of HealthCare Royalty Partners, adding exposure to biopharma royalties. With $115 billion in uncalled capital and a strong monetization pipeline — including over $800 million in pending performance income — KKR's operating momentum appears solid, though the stock's below-peak valuation suggests lingering investor caution around exit activity and private equity realization cycles.
In an environment where market conditions shift rapidly, traders and investors increasingly turn to data-driven tools for guidance. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of the platform's most relevant AI-powered trading bots — drawn from a pool of hundreds of bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers. These bots employ a range of technical and fundamental strategies across multiple timeframes, from swing trading to longer-term trend following, and their performance statistics vary widely depending on market regime and risk parameters. Only those bots demonstrating alignment with current conditions earn placement in this curated section. For traders seeking systematic, algorithm-driven insights into stocks like BLK, BX, and KKR — or any other ticker — exploring the Trending AI Robots page can serve as a valuable complement to traditional research.
At first glance, BlackRock, Blackstone, and KKR all operate in the asset management industry, but a closer examination reveals significant structural differences with implications for risk, return, and valuation. BlackRock's business is anchored in public-market funds — predominantly iShares ETFs — generating stable, recurring management fees on an enormous base of $12.5 trillion in AUM. Its expansion into private markets via acquisitions adds growth optionality but remains a smaller contributor relative to the core franchise. Blackstone and KKR, by contrast, are fundamentally alternative-asset managers: their revenue models rely more heavily on performance fees and carried interest tied to fund returns, making earnings more variable but also capable of outsized growth during strong realization cycles.
In terms of growth drivers, Blackstone currently holds the edge in scale within alternatives, with AUM exceeding $1.2 trillion and fee-related earnings growing at over 30% year-over-year. Its perpetual capital base — nearly $485 billion — provides ballast against redemption risk. KKR, while smaller at $686 billion in AUM, has demonstrated superior FRE growth on a percentage basis and benefits from a unique insurance ecosystem through Global Atlantic, which contributes both asset-management fees and insurance operating earnings. BlackRock, meanwhile, may offer the most defensive profile: its fee-based revenue model and massive diversification across geographies, client types, and asset classes provide resilience during periods of market volatility or slowing deal activity.
Risk factors diverge as well. Blackstone and KKR are more sensitive to credit spreads, interest rate movements, and the health of M&A (mergers and acquisitions) and IPO markets — all of which influence fund performance and realization timelines. BlackRock, by comparison, is more exposed to equity market beta and institutional flow behavior, as evidenced by the single-client outflow that pressured its stock in July. Valuation-wise, BLK trades at a lower forward P/E and offers a higher dividend yield, reflecting its mature, cash-generative profile. BX and KKR command premium valuations during favorable cycles but face sharper compression when sentiment toward alternatives sours.
Based on observable trend consistency, earnings momentum, and structural positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely favor Blackstone (BX) among the three in the current environment. The combination of accelerating fee-related earnings, record perpetual capital, a massive dry-powder reserve, and improving monetization visibility — including what management describes as the strongest forward IPO pipeline in four years — provides a compelling blend of growth and resilience. BlackRock (BLK) offers unmatched stability and defensive characteristics, making it a strong candidate for risk-averse positioning, though recent flow volatility introduces near-term uncertainty. KKR (KKR) presents a powerful earnings growth story, but its smaller scale and the market's cautious reception of its results suggest sentiment headwinds that may take time to resolve. In probabilistic terms, BX currently exhibits the most favorable alignment of catalysts, trend strength, and relative positioning, though all three firms remain well-equipped to navigate the evolving macroeconomic landscape.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BLK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBX’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and KKR’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BLK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and KKR’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
BLK (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.25% price change this week, while BX (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.33% , and KKR (@Investment Managers) price fluctuated -0.10% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.73%.
BLK is expected to report earnings on Oct 09, 2026.
BX is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
KKR is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| BLK | BX | KKR | |
| Capitalization | 161B | 152B | 87.2B |
| EBITDA | 10.6B | N/A | 9.89B |
| Gain YTD | -1.909 | -17.765 | -23.535 |
| P/E Ratio | 24.88 | 31.83 | 33.03 |
| Revenue | 25.6B | 12.6B | 20.4B |
| Total Cash | 13.1B | N/A | 132B |
| Total Debt | 15B | 14.2B | 54.6B |
BLK | BX | KKR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 20 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 70 Overvalued | 13 Undervalued | 80 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 73 | 71 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 66 | 29 | 70 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 61 | 71 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 86 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BX's Valuation (13) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLK (70) and is significantly better than the same rating for KKR (80). This means that BX's stock grew somewhat faster than BLK’s and significantly faster than KKR’s over the last 12 months.
BLK's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as KKR (71) and is in the same range as BX (73). This means that BLK's stock grew similarly to KKR’s and similarly to BX’s over the last 12 months.
BX's SMR Rating (29) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLK (66) and is somewhat better than the same rating for KKR (70). This means that BX's stock grew somewhat faster than BLK’s and somewhat faster than KKR’s over the last 12 months.
BLK's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BX (61) and is in the same range as KKR (71). This means that BLK's stock grew similarly to BX’s and similarly to KKR’s over the last 12 months.
BLK's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BX (86) and is somewhat better than the same rating for KKR (93). This means that BLK's stock grew similarly to BX’s and somewhat faster than KKR’s over the last 12 months.
| BLK | BX | KKR | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | N/A | 1 day ago 53% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 58% | 7 days ago 70% | 7 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 3 days ago 71% | 1 day ago 52% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 7 days ago 67% | 7 days ago 72% |