This stock comparison examines BN (Brookfield Corporation), BX (Blackstone Inc.), and JHG (Janus Henderson Group plc), three prominent players in asset management. These firms cater to investors seeking exposure to alternatives, real assets, and active strategies amid evolving market dynamics like AI infrastructure demand and interest rate shifts. Traders focused on relative performance, growth drivers, and valuation trade-offs will find value here, as recent momentum and catalysts differentiate their positioning in the current environment.
BN, a global alternative asset manager, focuses on real estate, infrastructure, renewable power, and private equity, with a market cap exceeding $105B. Recent market activity has propelled shares up over 10% in the past month and 4.7% in five days, trading around $47 with YTD gains of 2%. Key influences include nuclear ventures, AI cloud initiatives, and preferred share issuances totaling C$750M, alongside record distributable earnings. Sentiment benefits from diversified operating businesses and fee-bearing capital growth, though high leverage (debt ~$259B) tempers risk appetite in volatile conditions.
BX, the world's largest alternative asset manager with $1T+ in AUM across private equity, real estate, and credit, holds a $152B market cap. Shares hover near $124, reflecting 1-month gains of ~8% but YTD declines of 19% and softer 3-month performance. Recent drivers encompass Q1 earnings beats ($1.36 EPS vs. $1.35 est.), AI data center pursuits, e-commerce acquisitions like Skroutz, and life sciences investments. Momentum stems from realizations and fundraising, yet premium valuations (P/E ~32x) and private credit headwinds have pressured relative positioning.
JHG, an active asset manager specializing in equities, fixed income, and multi-asset strategies, manages $480B AUM (assets under management) with a $8B market cap. Trading around $52 (P/E ~10x), shares posted flat weekly moves but YTD +9% gains. Recent developments feature Q1 net inflows of $2.9B, though earnings ($0.90 adjusted EPS) missed estimates; long-term outperformance (66-68% of AUM beating benchmarks over 3-10 years) supports sentiment. A pending $52/share privatization by Trian and General Catalyst adds a floor, amid stable flows in recent weeks.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available on the platform, which collectively trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. Out of 351 total bots, over 25 are spotlighted as trending, selected by AI for superior adaptation to current market volatility via strategies like trend analysis, multi-agent coordination, and precise TP/SL (take-profit/stop-loss) corridors (e.g., 3% TP/2% SL). Stats shine with annualized returns from +23% to +285%, win rates of 51-88%, and profit factors up to 11.7—such as +285% in space infrastructure (72% win rate, 15min timeframe) or +96% in semiconductors. Diverse styles span short-term (5-60min) to swing trades (up to 46 days), covering sectors like AI data centers, miners, and leveraged ETFs. These bots outperform benchmarks, ideal for today's conditions; explore them via copy trading for real-time edge.
BN, BX, and JHG share asset management DNA but diverge in scale and focus: BX's mega-AUM drives private equity dominance, BN blends operating assets with alternatives, and JHG emphasizes retail active funds. Growth contrasts BN/BX AI/infra catalysts against JHG's inflows. Recent momentum favors BN (monthly +10%), with BX rebounding but YTD lagging. Risks include BN's leverage vs. BX's credit exposure and JHG's merger uncertainty. Valuation sensitivity shows JHG cheapest (EV/EBITDA ~4.6x), BX priciest; sentiment tilts to alts amid rate cuts.
Tickeron’s AI leans toward BN in the current environment, citing consistent recent trend strength (+10% monthly), AI/nuclear catalysts, and relative outperformance versus BX's YTD weakness despite scale. JHG's acquisition provides stability but limits upside. Probabilistic edge favors BN for momentum traders, based on observable positioning.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBX’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and JHG’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BX’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and JHG’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
BN (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.37% price change this week, while BX (@Investment Managers) price change was +6.45% , and JHG (@Investment Managers) price fluctuated +0.15% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.77%.
BN is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
BX is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2026.
JHG is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| BN | BX | JHG | |
| Capitalization | 101B | 150B | 7.99B |
| EBITDA | 33.1B | N/A | 1.2B |
| Gain YTD | -1.305 | -18.666 | 8.976 |
| P/E Ratio | 88.65 | 31.48 | 10.27 |
| Revenue | 75.7B | 12.6B | 3.17B |
| Total Cash | 19.7B | N/A | 2.6B |
| Total Debt | 264B | 14.2B | 396M |
BN | BX | JHG | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 63 | 41 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 87 Overvalued | 15 Undervalued | 14 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 31 | 67 | 50 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 28 | 55 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 54 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 78 | 80 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 35 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
JHG's Valuation (14) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BX (15) and is significantly better than the same rating for BN (87). This means that JHG's stock grew similarly to BX’s and significantly faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.
BN's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as JHG (50) and is somewhat better than the same rating for BX (67). This means that BN's stock grew similarly to JHG’s and somewhat faster than BX’s over the last 12 months.
BX's SMR Rating (28) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as JHG (55) and is somewhat better than the same rating for BN (90). This means that BX's stock grew similarly to JHG’s and somewhat faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.
JHG's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BN (49) and is in the same range as BX (54). This means that JHG's stock grew similarly to BN’s and similarly to BX’s over the last 12 months.
BX's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as JHG (80) and is in the same range as BN (96). This means that BX's stock grew similarly to JHG’s and similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.
| BN | BX | JHG | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 46% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 78% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 66% | 8 days ago 67% | 18 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 43% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 49% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JHG has been loosely correlated with TROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JHG jumps, then TROW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JHG | 100% | +0.02% | ||
| TROW - JHG | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| CG - JHG | 47% Loosely correlated | +2.69% | ||
| BBUC - JHG | 44% Loosely correlated | +2.44% | ||
| STT - JHG | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| APAM - JHG | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.13% | ||
More | ||||