BP
Price
$41.90
Change
+$0.82 (+2.00%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
105.47B
16 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SU
Price
$62.43
Change
+$1.75 (+2.88%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
72.8B
23 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XOM
Price
$147.36
Change
+$1.41 (+0.97%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
610.8B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BP or SU or XOM

BP vs SU vs XOM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? BP (BP) vs. Suncor Energy (SU) vs. ExxonMobil (XOM) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • BP is navigating a major strategic reset—refocusing on oil and gas, selling $20 billion in assets, and undergoing a CEO transition—while delivering back-to-back earnings beats.
  • SU has delivered the strongest relative momentum among the three, powered by record upstream production, a disciplined operational turnaround, and robust shareholder returns.
  • XOM remains the heavyweight champion of scale and balance-sheet strength, with unmatched diversification, a $20 billion buyback program, and low debt-to-capital of 15.4%.
  • Dividend-seeking investors may gravitate toward BP (yield above 5%) or SU (yield near 4%), while XOM offers a lower but historically resilient 2.8% yield with 43 consecutive years of increases.
  • Geopolitical tailwinds from Middle East tensions have recently lifted all three, but each stock's sensitivity to crude oil prices and refining margins differs meaningfully in the current environment.

Introduction

Investors seeking exposure to the global energy sector often weigh integrated oil and gas majors against one another. BP, SU (Suncor Energy), and XOM (ExxonMobil) represent three distinct approaches to navigating today's complex energy landscape—spanning British, Canadian, and American market perspectives, respectively. Each company operates across the upstream, downstream, and midstream segments, yet their geographic footprints, asset profiles, and strategic priorities diverge in important ways. This comparison examines how these three energy stocks are positioned across key dimensions including recent performance, business models, growth catalysts, risk factors, and market sentiment. Whether you are a dividend-focused investor, a value seeker, or a momentum-driven trader, understanding these contrasts can provide useful context for evaluating relative opportunity in the energy space.

BP Overview and Recent Performance

BP is a British multinational oil and gas company operating in more than 60 countries, with its business organized across three divisions: oil production and operations, gas and low carbon energy, and customer and products (which includes Castrol lubricants, aviation fueling, and retail forecourts). The company has been undergoing a significant strategic reset since early 2025, pivoting away from its earlier aggressive renewable energy ambitions and refocusing capital toward its core hydrocarbons business. In recent months, this turnaround has shown tangible results: BP posted back-to-back quarterly earnings beats, including a third-quarter underlying replacement cost profit of $2.21 billion that exceeded consensus estimates by roughly 8%. Operational reliability has improved markedly, with refining availability reaching nearly 97%—the best quarter in two decades for its current portfolio. A CEO transition is underway, with Woodside's Meg O'Neill set to take the helm, replacing Murray Auchincloss. The company is targeting $20 billion in asset disposals by end-2027 to reduce net debt from approximately $26 billion to a target range of $14–18 billion. A quarterly share buyback of $750 million and a dividend yield above 5% underscore management's commitment to shareholder returns, though the elevated debt load and recent $4–5 billion impairment charge tied to transition businesses remain points of caution.

SU Overview and Recent Performance

SU (Suncor Energy) is a Canadian integrated energy company headquartered in Calgary, Alberta, with operations spanning oil sands development, conventional exploration and production, refining, and retail marketing under the Petro-Canada brand. In recent quarters, SU has emerged as one of the more compelling turnaround stories in the North American energy sector. Under CEO Rich Kruger's disciplined leadership, the company achieved record first-quarter upstream production of 875,000 barrels per day and record refining throughput of 498,000 barrels per day. Suncor hit its three-year Investor Day targets a full year ahead of schedule, generating CA$4.03 billion in adjusted funds from operations (AFFO)—a 32% year-over-year increase—and returning over CA$1.5 billion to shareholders through dividends and buybacks. The company has increased its planned 2026 share repurchases by more than 30% to nearly $4 billion. With a low debt-to-equity ratio of just 0.20 and a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio around 16, SU trades at a discount to many peers on valuation metrics. However, the stock remains heavily exposed to oil sands economics, carbon policy risk, and Western Canadian crude differentials, factors that warrant careful consideration. Suncor's one-year total return has exceeded 65%, reflecting robust operational momentum and growing investor confidence.

XOM Overview and Recent Performance

XOM (ExxonMobil) is the largest publicly traded integrated oil and gas company in the world by market capitalization—currently in excess of $610 billion. Its operations encompass the full energy value chain: upstream exploration and production, midstream transportation and storage, downstream refining and distribution, and a sizable petrochemicals segment. In recent months, XOM has benefited significantly from geopolitical disruptions in the Middle East, which drove Brent crude prices above $100 per barrel during the second quarter and boosted upstream earnings projections by approximately $3.5–3.9 billion over the prior quarter. The company reported first-quarter 2026 earnings of $4.2 billion, or $8.8 billion excluding unfavorable timing effects, and generated cash flow from operations of $8.7 billion. ExxonMobil's balance sheet remains a key differentiator: its debt-to-capital ratio of 15.4% is among the lowest in the industry. The company recently completed its legal domicile relocation from New Jersey to Texas, aligning its corporate home with its operational base and potentially reducing tax exposure. Key growth catalysts include record production in Guyana, the first LNG (liquefied natural gas) at the Golden Pass Train 1 facility, and a $20 billion share repurchase program for 2026. With a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share—backed by 43 consecutive years of increases—ExxonMobil continues to appeal to long-term, income-oriented investors, though its forward P/E of approximately 12 and elevated absolute valuation relative to the sector may give some pause.

Trending AI Robots

In today's fast-moving markets, traders are increasingly turning to AI-powered tools to help identify opportunities and manage risk. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform's most relevant algorithmic trading bots—handpicked from hundreds of available bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers. Only those bots demonstrating strong alignment with current market conditions earn a place in this featured section. The bots employ a wide variety of trading styles, strategies, and timeframes, each with its own statistical profile including performance metrics, win rates, drawdown data, and trade frequency. Some bots specialize in momentum-based swing trading while others focus on longer-term trend following or mean-reversion strategies. The common thread is that each featured bot has been identified based on merit and suitability for the prevailing market environment rather than generic promotion. For traders who want to explore how algorithmic intelligence can complement their own research process, the Trending AI Robots page offers a practical starting point.

Head-to-Head Comparison

When comparing BP, SU, and XOM directly, several contrasts emerge. In terms of scale and diversification, XOM is in a league of its own—its market capitalization of over $610 billion dwarfs both BP (roughly $90 billion) and SU (roughly $72 billion). ExxonMobil's integrated global platform and leading position in the Permian Basin and offshore Guyana provide a degree of earnings resilience that smaller peers cannot easily replicate. On balance sheet quality, XOM again leads with a debt-to-capital ratio of 15.4%, followed closely by SU with a debt-to-equity of 0.20, while BP carries notably higher leverage with net debt around $26 billion and a gearing ratio above 25%.

On dividend yield, BP currently offers the most generous payout at above 5%, though this higher yield partly reflects market skepticism about the sustainability of its capital returns amid a still-incomplete turnaround. SU yields approximately 4% with a payout ratio under 50%, suggesting room for growth. XOM yields around 2.8% but boasts the longest track record of consistent dividend increases. From a momentum standpoint, SU has outperformed both peers over the past twelve months with a gain exceeding 65%, driven by tangible operational improvements rather than commodity price movements alone. BP shares have risen approximately 14–19% over the past year, while XOM is up roughly 13–20%. Risk profiles differ as well: BP faces execution risk around its asset sale program and CEO transition; SU contends with oil sands-specific environmental and regulatory pressures; and XOM faces headline risk from geopolitics and political scrutiny over energy prices.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trends, relative positioning, and the nature of algorithmic pattern recognition, Tickeron's AI would likely view SU (Suncor Energy) as the most probabilistically favorable candidate among these three in the current market environment. The stock's sustained upward trend, record operational execution, consistent earnings growth, and strong free cash flow generation represent the kind of multi-factor alignment that trend-following and momentum-oriented AI models tend to favor. XOM would likely rank a close second, with its balance-sheet fortress and geopolitical tailwinds providing stability signals that risk-averse algorithms would reward. BP, while offering an attractive valuation and high dividend yield, introduces more uncertainty into the pattern-recognition framework due to the ongoing CEO transition, elevated leverage, and asset disposal timeline—factors that can generate noise in the data that AI models are designed to filter. That said, no algorithmic assessment can capture every nuance of these complex businesses, and relative rankings would naturally shift as market conditions, earnings data, and macro signals evolve.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 20, 2026
Stock price -- (BP: $41.90SU: $62.43XOM: $147.36)
Brand notoriety: BP, SU and XOM are all notable
The three companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BP: 58%, SU: 96%, XOM: 111%
Market capitalization -- BP: $105.47B, SU: $72.8B, XOM: $610.8B
$BP is valued at $105.47B, while SU has a market capitalization of $72.8B, and XOM's market capitalization is $610.8B. The market cap for tickers in this @Integrated Oil ranges from $610.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Integrated Oil industry is $111.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSU’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and XOM’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SU’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • XOM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SU is a better buy in the long-term than XOM, which in turn is a better option than BP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SU’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and XOM’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • XOM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, XOM is a better buy in the short-term than BP, which in turn is a better option than SU.

Price Growth

BP (@Integrated Oil) experienced а +6.89% price change this week, while SU (@Integrated Oil) price change was +5.37% , and XOM (@Integrated Oil) price fluctuated +6.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was +4.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

BP is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

SU is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

XOM is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (+4.55% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XOM($611B) has a higher market cap than BP($105B) and SU($72.8B). BP has higher P/E ratio than XOM and SU: BP (33.90) vs XOM (24.81) and SU (16.85). SU YTD gains are higher at: 40.735 vs. XOM (24.106) and BP (23.608). XOM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 64.4B vs. BP (35B) and SU (16.2B). BP has more cash in the bank: 35.8B vs. XOM (8.44B) and SU (3.27B). SU has less debt than XOM and BP: SU (14.8B) vs XOM (47.7B) and BP (74.2B). XOM has higher revenues than BP and SU: XOM (326B) vs BP (195B) and SU (54.5B).
BPSUXOM
Capitalization105B72.8B611B
EBITDA35B16.2B64.4B
Gain YTD23.60840.73524.106
P/E Ratio33.9016.8524.81
Revenue195B54.5B326B
Total Cash35.8B3.27B8.44B
Total Debt74.2B14.8B47.7B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BP vs SU vs XOM: Fundamental Ratings
BP
SU
XOM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
10722
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
31
Undervalued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
241712
SMR RATING
1..100
846173
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
464127
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
981814
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BP's Valuation (24) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as SU (31) and is somewhat better than the same rating for XOM (66). This means that BP's stock grew similarly to SU’s and somewhat faster than XOM’s over the last 12 months.

XOM's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as SU (17) and is in the same range as BP (24). This means that XOM's stock grew similarly to SU’s and similarly to BP’s over the last 12 months.

SU's SMR Rating (61) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as XOM (73) and is in the same range as BP (84). This means that SU's stock grew similarly to XOM’s and similarly to BP’s over the last 12 months.

XOM's Price Growth Rating (27) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as SU (41) and is in the same range as BP (46). This means that XOM's stock grew similarly to SU’s and similarly to BP’s over the last 12 months.

XOM's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as SU (18) and is significantly better than the same rating for BP (98). This means that XOM's stock grew similarly to SU’s and significantly faster than BP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPSUXOM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XOM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GHAYX54.290.13
+0.24%
VanEck Global Resources Fund Y
JCNRX28.70N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Contrarian R
PQUAX13.91-0.06
-0.43%
PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity A
SLGAX15.32-0.14
-0.91%
SEI Large Cap F (SIMT)
WFENX17.10-0.16
-0.93%
Allspring International Equity Inst

BP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BP has been closely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BP jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BP
1D Price
Change %
BP100%
+2.00%
SHEL - BP
78%
Closely correlated
+2.63%
E - BP
75%
Closely correlated
+3.60%
EQNR - BP
75%
Closely correlated
+4.88%
SU - BP
71%
Closely correlated
+2.88%
CVE - BP
71%
Closely correlated
+2.64%
More