These three leveraged exchange-traded products allow investors to pursue amplified daily exposure within the technology and innovation space. While they share a 3x daily leverage objective, they target distinct segments of the technology ecosystem: BULZ focuses on FANG and innovation leaders, SOXL concentrates on semiconductors, and TECL provides broader technology sector coverage. The comparison highlights differences in index construction, fund structure, cost, and thematic emphasis that matter for investors seeking tactical exposure in the current market environment.
BULZ seeks three times the daily performance of the Solactive FANG Innovation Index before fees and expenses. The index comprises 15 large-capitalization U.S. technology stocks, including eight core components (Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, Netflix, NVIDIA, and Tesla) plus seven additional names selected by methodology. As an exchange-traded note (ETN) issued by Bank of Montreal, it carries issuer credit risk rather than holding underlying securities. The product maintains approximately 15 holdings in an equal-weighted approach, carries a 0.95% expense ratio, and resets leverage daily. Its narrow focus on high-growth innovation names distinguishes it from broader sector products.
SOXL aims for 300% of the daily performance of the ICE Semiconductor Index before fees and expenses. The index tracks the 30 largest U.S.-listed semiconductor companies using a modified float-adjusted market-capitalization weighting. The ETF employs derivatives such as swaps and futures to achieve leverage, holds a modest number of positions directly, and maintains a net expense ratio of 0.75%. Daily rebalancing supports the leverage target but introduces compounding effects. SOXL offers targeted exposure to the semiconductor industry, a key driver of artificial intelligence and electronics supply chains.
TECL seeks 300% of the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector Index before fees and expenses. The index includes domestic technology companies across hardware, software, semiconductors, and related services. The ETF uses swaps and other financial instruments to deliver leverage, features a diversified set of holdings within the sector, and carries a net expense ratio of 0.87%. Daily reset mechanics apply, and the product provides broad technology-sector exposure rather than a narrow sub-industry focus.
The technology sector continues to benefit from sustained capital spending on artificial intelligence infrastructure, cloud computing, and advanced semiconductors. Semiconductor demand remains elevated due to data-center buildouts and electronics innovation, while regulatory scrutiny around competition and export controls introduces periodic volatility. Earnings growth among leading technology firms has supported investor interest, though macroeconomic factors such as interest-rate expectations and global supply-chain dynamics influence sector sentiment. Capital flows into technology-themed products reflect ongoing thematic conviction, tempered by valuation considerations and geopolitical risks affecting chip supply.
In recent market cycles, the three products have exhibited high volatility consistent with 3x daily leverage. SOXL’s semiconductor concentration has produced sharper moves during chip-cycle upswings and downturns compared with TECL’s broader technology exposure. BULZ’s focus on a handful of mega-cap names has resulted in pronounced sensitivity to those specific equities’ performance. Relative drawdowns and recovery patterns differ based on each product’s underlying index composition and leverage reset frequency. Investors have observed that structural differences in sector tilt and concentration contribute to varying responsiveness to macro factors such as interest rates and technology spending trends.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. AI Screener
Based on observable structural characteristics, SOXL’s lower net expense ratio, ETF structure without ETN counterparty risk, and focused semiconductor exposure aligned with persistent artificial-intelligence infrastructure demand position it with a probabilistic edge in risk-adjusted thematic positioning among the three. BULZ and TECL offer complementary but narrower or broader tilts that may suit different tactical mandates. All remain high-risk leveraged vehicles intended for short-term horizons.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| BULZ | SOXL | TECL | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| UBR | 44.54 | 1.82 | +4.26% |
| ProShares Ultra MSCI Brazil Capped (UBR) | |||
| TLG | 29.02 | 0.36 | +1.26% |
| Touchstone Large Company Growth ETF (TLG) | |||
| GSWO | 65.56 | 0.40 | +0.61% |
| Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Low Vol Plus Equity ETF | |||
| ASHS | 39.42 | 0.22 | +0.55% |
| Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) | |||
| XRT | 84.09 | 0.18 | +0.21% |
| State Street SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BULZ has been closely correlated with ADBE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BULZ jumps, then ADBE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BULZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BULZ | 100% | +1.60% | ||
| ADBE - BULZ | 80% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| ORCL - BULZ | 60% Loosely correlated | +4.59% | ||
| MSFT - BULZ | 10% Poorly correlated | +2.38% | ||
| META - BULZ | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.31% | ||
| CRM - BULZ | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.58% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SOXL has been closely correlated with MKSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SOXL jumps, then MKSI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SOXL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOXL | 100% | -1.94% | ||
| MKSI - SOXL | 82% Closely correlated | +1.58% | ||
| ONTO - SOXL | 82% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| ASX - SOXL | 82% Closely correlated | +2.59% | ||
| TSM - SOXL | 81% Closely correlated | -1.02% | ||
| STM - SOXL | 73% Closely correlated | -1.23% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TECL has been loosely correlated with COHR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TECL jumps, then COHR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TECL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TECL | 100% | +1.52% | ||
| COHR - TECL | 66% Loosely correlated | +3.40% | ||
| GLW - TECL | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.52% | ||
| KEYS - TECL | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.16% | ||
| ANET - TECL | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.73% | ||
| CIEN - TECL | 60% Loosely correlated | +5.60% | ||
More | ||||