Advertisement
CCEP or KDP or PEP
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) vs. Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) vs. PepsiCo (PEP) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CCEP delivered robust H1 2026 results with volume growth and reaffirmed full-year guidance, supported by ongoing share buybacks and category strength in sports and hydration.
- KDP reported significant Q2 revenue expansion driven by the JDE Peet’s acquisition, with legacy business growth and reaffirmed 2026 outlook amid integration progress.
- PEP has faced recent stock pressure amid North American challenges, restructuring actions, and broader sector concerns, despite stable dividend policy and international contributions.
- Relative performance shows CCEP maintaining steadier momentum in recent weeks compared to peers, while KDP benefits from acquisition scale and PEP contends with valuation sensitivity.
- Business models differ in geographic exposure and diversification, with CCEP focused on Europe-Asia-Pacific bottling, KDP on U.S. beverages plus coffee, and PEP on global snacks and beverages.
- Market sentiment reflects cautious optimism for acquisition-driven names like KDP and buyback-supported CCEP, versus more defensive positioning for PEP.
Introduction
Investors and traders often compare CCEP, KDP, and PEP as leading consumer staples names in the non-alcoholic beverages and packaged foods sector. These stocks offer exposure to established brands with varying degrees of geographic reach, product diversification, and growth drivers. The comparison is particularly relevant for those assessing relative performance, valuation, and positioning amid evolving consumer preferences, acquisition impacts, and macroeconomic factors. Participants in equity markets seeking balanced exposure within staples may find this analysis useful for understanding trade-offs in stability, momentum, and sector dynamics.
CCEP Overview and Recent Performance
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners operates as a major bottler and distributor for The Coca-Cola Company across Europe, Asia Pacific, and Australasia. In recent market activity, the stock has shown resilience following strong first-half 2026 results that highlighted volume growth of 5.6% and revenue increases, with management reaffirming full-year guidance. Ongoing execution of a €1 billion share buyback program and expansions in sports, hydration, and energy categories have supported sentiment. Recent board adjustments and continued analyst attention on price targets reflect steady operational focus, though broader market conditions have contributed to modest price fluctuations in recent weeks.
KDP Overview and Recent Performance
Keurig Dr Pepper produces and distributes beverages including soft drinks, juices, and coffee systems primarily in North America, with expanding international presence. Recent performance has been shaped by the April 2026 closing of the JDE Peet’s acquisition, which drove substantial Q2 revenue gains while legacy operations posted solid growth. Management reaffirmed 2026 guidance, citing integration progress and synergies. A quarterly dividend declaration in mid-September and positive analyst commentary on brand momentum have influenced positioning, with the stock experiencing typical post-earnings consolidation amid sector-wide movements in recent weeks.
PEP Overview and Recent Performance
PepsiCo engages in beverages and snacks globally, with major brands across carbonated drinks, snacks, and nutrition. In recent market activity, the stock has experienced downward pressure following earlier earnings and amid ongoing North American softness, plant optimization efforts, and sector discussions around consumer trends. A September board appointment and consistent dividend policy provide continuity, while international markets continue to contribute. Broader valuation considerations and macroeconomic factors have weighed on performance in recent weeks, resulting in relative underperformance versus peers.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots from hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance profiles tailored to current market conditions. Only the most suitable and highest-performing options in the present environment earn placement in this trending section. Available bots feature diverse statistics, including ranges of win rates, profit factors, and drawdown metrics that reflect their distinct approaches. This resource provides traders with transparent data on bot performance across multiple assets. Explore the full selection at Trending AI Robots for additional insights.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Business models present clear contrasts: CCEP functions primarily as a regional bottler with concentrated exposure to Europe and Asia-Pacific markets, KDP combines U.S. refreshment beverages with coffee systems amplified by recent acquisition, and PEP maintains broader global diversification across snacks and beverages. Growth drivers differ accordingly, with CCEP emphasizing volume and category innovation, KDP leveraging integration synergies, and PEP navigating snacks headwinds alongside international strength. Recent momentum favors CCEP and KDP through buybacks and acquisition effects, while PEP shows greater sensitivity to consumer shifts. Risk factors include regulatory and currency exposure for CCEP, integration execution for KDP, and portfolio concentration concerns for PEP. Valuation metrics reflect these profiles, with market sentiment remaining constructive on operational execution across the group but differentiated by recent catalysts.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in recent weeks, stability from buyback activity, and acquisition-related positioning, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic preference toward CCEP for its balanced momentum and operational reaffirmations relative to peers. KDP follows closely due to scale expansion, while PEP appears positioned more defensively amid broader pressures. This assessment draws from verifiable performance patterns and catalysts without implying definitive outcomes.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
CCEP | KDP | PEP | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 61 | 53 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 32 Undervalued | 28 Undervalued | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 98 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 82 | 20 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 46 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 14 | 81 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PEP's Valuation (16) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as KDP (28) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is in the same range as CCEP (32) in the null industry. This means that PEP's stock grew similarly to KDP’s and similarly to CCEP’s over the last 12 months.
CCEP's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KDP (98) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for PEP (100) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCEP's stock grew significantly faster than KDP’s and significantly faster than PEP’s over the last 12 months.
PEP's SMR Rating (20) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KDP (82) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for CCEP (91) in the null industry. This means that PEP's stock grew somewhat faster than KDP’s and significantly faster than CCEP’s over the last 12 months.
KDP's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CCEP (54) in the null industry, and is in the same range as PEP (62) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that KDP's stock grew similarly to CCEP’s and similarly to PEP’s over the last 12 months.
KDP's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCEP (52) in the null industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for PEP (81) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that KDP's stock grew somewhat faster than CCEP’s and significantly faster than PEP’s over the last 12 months.
| CCEP | KDP | PEP | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | N/A | 1 day ago 44% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 48% | 7 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 52% | 6 days ago 36% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 70% | 7 days ago 51% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 40% | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 46% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 37% | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 54% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 36% | 8 days ago 48% | 7 days ago 48% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | N/A | 1 day ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 26% | 1 day ago 40% | 1 day ago 43% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCEP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while KDP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and PEP’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
- CCEP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- KDP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PEP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCEP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KDP’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and PEP’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CCEP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- KDP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PEP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CCEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -0.57% price change this week, while KDP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +0.32% , and PEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price fluctuated -2.32% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -1.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.26%.
Reported Earning Dates
CCEP is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
KDP is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
PEP is expected to report earnings on Oct 08, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-1.42% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
Advertisement
CCEP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCEP has been loosely correlated with MNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCEP jumps, then MNST could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCEP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCEP | 100% | +0.24% | ||
| MNST - CCEP | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| PEP - CCEP | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.05% | ||
| COKE - CCEP | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| KDP - CCEP | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| FIZZ - CCEP | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.60% | ||
More | ||||
KDP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KDP has been loosely correlated with PEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KDP jumps, then PEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KDP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KDP | 100% | +0.78% | ||
| PEP - KDP | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.05% | ||
| MNST - KDP | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| CCEP - KDP | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| FIZZ - KDP | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| COKE - KDP | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.18% | ||
More | ||||
PEP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PEP has been loosely correlated with CCEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PEP jumps, then CCEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PEP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEP | 100% | +0.05% | ||
| CCEP - PEP | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| KDP - PEP | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| FIZZ - PEP | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.60% | ||
| MNST - PEP | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.60% | ||
| COKE - PEP | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.18% | ||
More | ||||