CMS
Price
$70.51
Change
+$0.49 (+0.70%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
22.11B
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HAL
Price
$32.84
Change
-$0.45 (-1.35%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
27.36B
74 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RJF
Price
$180.99
Change
-$0.19 (-0.10%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
34.82B
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMS or HAL or RJF

CMS vs HAL vs RJF Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 14, 2026
Stock price -- (CMS: $70.51HAL: $32.84RJF: $180.99)
Brand notoriety: CMS and RJF are not notable and HAL is notable
CMS represents the Electric Utilities industry, HAL is part of the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry, and RJF is in the Investment Managers industry.
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMS: 109%, HAL: 60%, RJF: 55%
Market capitalization -- CMS: $22.11B, HAL: $27.36B, RJF: $34.82B
CMS [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $22.11B. HAL’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $27.36B. RJF [@Investment Managers] has a market capitalization of $34.82B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $179.41B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $77.26B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $183.19B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $30.85B. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $6.23B. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $10.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHAL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and RJF’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CMS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HAL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RJF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, RJF is a better buy in the long-term than HAL, which in turn is a better option than CMS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HAL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and RJF’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HAL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RJF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HAL is a better buy in the short-term than CMS, which in turn is a better option than RJF.

Price Growth

CMS (@Electric Utilities) experienced а -0.17% price change this week, while HAL (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +1.02% , and RJF (@Investment Managers) price fluctuated +0.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.15%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +2.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +51.97%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

HAL is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

RJF is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (+0.25% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+2.19% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

@Investment Managers (+2.82% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RJF($34.8B) has a higher market cap than HAL($27.4B) and CMS($22.1B). CMS has higher P/E ratio than HAL and RJF: CMS (21.21) vs HAL (17.19) and RJF (15.78). HAL YTD gains are higher at: 17.266 vs. RJF (13.911) and CMS (3.199). HAL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.59B vs. CMS (3.3B) and RJF (). RJF has less debt than HAL and CMS: RJF (4.22B) vs HAL (8.2B) and CMS (19.3B). HAL has higher revenues than RJF and CMS: HAL (22.4B) vs RJF (14.5B) and CMS (8.81B).
CMSHALRJF
Capitalization22.1B27.4B34.8B
EBITDA3.3B3.59BN/A
Gain YTD3.19917.26613.911
P/E Ratio21.2117.1915.78
Revenue8.81B22.4B14.5B
Total CashN/A2.05B2.61B
Total Debt19.3B8.2B4.22B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMS vs HAL vs RJF: Fundamental Ratings
CMS
HAL
RJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
69524
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
27
Undervalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
496321
SMR RATING
1..100
675816
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
615429
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
511150
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HAL's Valuation (27) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as CMS (56) in the Electric Utilities industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for RJF (71) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that HAL's stock grew similarly to CMS’s and somewhat faster than RJF’s over the last 12 months.

RJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as CMS (49) in the Electric Utilities industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for HAL (63) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that RJF's stock grew similarly to CMS’s and somewhat faster than HAL’s over the last 12 months.

RJF's SMR Rating (16) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HAL (58) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for CMS (67) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that RJF's stock grew somewhat faster than HAL’s and somewhat faster than CMS’s over the last 12 months.

RJF's Price Growth Rating (29) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as HAL (54) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry, and is in the same range as CMS (61) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that RJF's stock grew similarly to HAL’s and similarly to CMS’s over the last 12 months.

HAL's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RJF (50) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for CMS (51) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that HAL's stock grew somewhat faster than RJF’s and somewhat faster than CMS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMSHALRJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HAL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RJF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CCI75.731.76
+2.38%
Crown Castle
SEB4254.5953.24
+1.27%
Seaboard Corp
TKLF1.93-0.03
-1.53%
Tokyo Lifestyle Co Ltd
OCC16.63-0.26
-1.54%
Optical Cable Corp
SECZ5.70-2.16
-27.48%
Securitize Corp

CMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMS has been closely correlated with DTE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CMS jumps, then DTE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMS
1D Price
Change %
CMS100%
+0.70%
DTE - CMS
85%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
AEE - CMS
84%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
DUK - CMS
83%
Closely correlated
+0.81%
WEC - CMS
83%
Closely correlated
+1.07%
LNT - CMS
83%
Closely correlated
-0.06%
More

RJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RJF has been closely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RJF jumps, then SF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RJF
1D Price
Change %
RJF100%
-0.10%
SF - RJF
87%
Closely correlated
+0.87%
MS - RJF
82%
Closely correlated
+0.34%
EVR - RJF
80%
Closely correlated
+4.16%
GS - RJF
80%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
PIPR - RJF
78%
Closely correlated
+3.84%
More