Canadian National Railway (CNI), Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP), and Union Pacific (UNP) represent leading North American Class I railroads whose networks span Canada, the United States, and Mexico. Investors and traders focused on the industrials sector often compare these names when evaluating exposure to freight transportation, commodity cycles, and cross-border trade flows. The comparison is particularly relevant for those seeking to assess relative performance, valuation differentials, and operational momentum within a concentrated industry where network efficiency and volume trends drive results.
Canadian National Railway operates an extensive rail network across Canada and into the United States, transporting intermodal containers, grain, fertilizers, petroleum, chemicals, and forest products. In recent market activity, the stock has traded near $119 after retreating from a July high above $130. Year-to-date returns remain solidly positive near 22%, supported by record grain volumes and steady demand for Canadian exports. Sentiment has been influenced by strong operational metrics and analyst commentary on volume outlook upgrades, though near-term price action reflects broader sector consolidation following summer gains.
Canadian Pacific Kansas City provides rail service across Canada, the United States, and Mexico following its combination with Kansas City Southern. The stock has recently closed near $87 after declining from an August peak near $97. Year-to-date performance stands near 19% to 21%, buoyed by record August grain shipments exceeding 2.5 million metric tonnes. Recent weeks have featured modest pullbacks amid sector rotation, with attention on integration progress and cross-border commodity movements that continue to support freight volumes.
Union Pacific operates the largest railroad network in the western United States, serving intermodal, agricultural, industrial, and energy customers. Shares have recently traded near $279 following a retreat from July highs above $315. Year-to-date gains approximate 22% to 28%, reflecting pricing discipline and resilient volumes even as certain segments experienced softness. Market positioning has been shaped by earnings beats and management commentary on fuel costs and network investments, contributing to steady institutional interest despite short-term price consolidation.
Tickeron maintains a curated Trending AI Robots section that highlights select AI trading bots from a library of hundreds designed to trade thousands of different tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions receive placement in this section. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics, with many focused on equities including individual tickers or sector baskets. Users can explore detailed metrics on win rates, drawdowns, and trade frequency to identify approaches suited to their objectives.
Business models differ in geographic emphasis: CNI and CP maintain significant Canadian and cross-border exposure with growing Mexico reach through CP, while UNP concentrates on the U.S. western corridor. Growth drivers include grain and bulk commodity exports for the Canadian carriers versus intermodal and industrial freight for UNP. Recent momentum shows all three posting double-digit year-to-date advances, yet CNI and UNP have outpaced CP on a trailing twelve-month basis. Risk factors encompass regulatory scrutiny of rail mergers, fuel-price volatility, and labor dynamics, with CP carrying integration-related considerations. Valuation sensitivity appears higher for CP given its elevated price-to-earnings multiple, while CNI offers a comparatively lower multiple and UNP balances scale with moderate leverage. Market sentiment remains constructive across the group, supported by volume records and earnings resilience, though near-term trading has been range-bound following earlier rallies.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, relative stability during the recent pullback, and positioning within the railroads sector, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a modestly higher probabilistic preference to CNI. Its combination of lower valuation multiples, sustained volume strength, and balanced geographic exposure contributes to this edge in quantitative assessments, though outcomes remain contingent on broader economic and commodity trends.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
CNI | CP | UNP | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 52 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | 90 Overvalued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 63 | 44 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 44 | 76 | 26 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 55 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | 20 | 32 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CNI's Valuation (86) in the Railroads industry is in the same range as UNP (87) and is in the same range as CP (90). This means that CNI's stock grew similarly to UNP’s and similarly to CP’s over the last 12 months.
UNP's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Railroads industry is in the same range as CP (63) and is somewhat better than the same rating for CNI (100). This means that UNP's stock grew similarly to CP’s and somewhat faster than CNI’s over the last 12 months.
UNP's SMR Rating (26) in the Railroads industry is in the same range as CNI (44) and is somewhat better than the same rating for CP (76). This means that UNP's stock grew similarly to CNI’s and somewhat faster than CP’s over the last 12 months.
UNP's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Railroads industry is in the same range as CNI (48) and is in the same range as CP (55). This means that UNP's stock grew similarly to CNI’s and similarly to CP’s over the last 12 months.
CP's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Railroads industry is in the same range as CNI (23) and is in the same range as UNP (32). This means that CP's stock grew similarly to CNI’s and similarly to UNP’s over the last 12 months.
| CNI | CP | UNP | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | N/A | 1 day ago 42% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | N/A | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 42% | 16 days ago 56% | 7 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 46% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 59% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CNI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while CP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and UNP’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CNI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and UNP’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CNI (@Railroads) experienced а -2.65% price change this week, while CP (@Railroads) price change was -1.73% , and UNP (@Railroads) price fluctuated +0.94% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Railroads industry was -2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.92%.
CNI is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2026.
CP is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
UNP is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
The Railroad industry includes passenger and freight transportation services along rail lines. This also includes companies that provide maintenance and switching duties as part of rail services. Within North America, the industry is largely dominated by some large operators. Several short-line railroads serve regional and local routes. Union Pacific Corporation, Canadian National Railway Company, and CSX Corporation are some of the prominent names in the business. The railroad business is relatively cyclical; economic expansion boost the freight services in particular, while economic stagnation often dampens transportation demand.